Early years · Early years compliance action
Treetops Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
17 Feb 2023
- URN verified
EY458112
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 505
- longer than usual (typical 317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 35
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 16 January 2023, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions the provider was required to take to meet the requirements. We served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that requires the provider to take action within the timescales set out.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 8 February 2023, we carried out a regulatory visit. The focus of the visit was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions, raised at their last inspection. We found the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others. The provider had systems in pace to promote the good health of adults and children, with a focus on infection control.
p.1
Summary of outcome
However, we found that the provider had not met all the actions set in the welfare requirement notice. Additionally, during the regulatory visit on 8 February 2023, we found new areas of concern. We have served another welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n make sure that staff are deployed in a way that meets the needs of all children, especially those with special educational needs and/or disabilities
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure an effective key-person system is in place so that children's individual care and learning needs are met
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure staff receive thorough induction training when their roles and responsibilities change so they continue to understand what is expected of them.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure that necessary training and professional development opportunities for staff are provided, and make sure these are effective in raising the quality of the learning and development experiences all children receive to support their good progress
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure performance management of staff is effective in raising the quality of education and addresses any ongoing weaknesses
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure appropriate arrangements are in place to support children with SEN or disabilities as advised by children's education, health and care plans.
p.2
Summary of outcome
On 28 March 2023, we carried out a regulatory telephone call. The focus of the telephone call was to check whether the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions, raised on 8 February 2023. We found the provider had met the safeguarding and welfare actions. They had systems in place to ensure staff were deployed appropriately to meet the needs of all children. An effective key-person system had been implemented which made sure all children's care and learning needs were being met. The manager had developed training and support systems so that staff were able and skilled to fulfil their roles, leading to improvements in the quality of education. Finally, children with special educational needs and/or disabilities were being supported in line with their education, health and care plans.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider has chosen to resign their registration.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion