Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Chariteens Residential Family Centre

Inspected 27 Jan 2023 · published 1 Apr 2023 · URN SC474728

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sandra Jacobs-Walls

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Chariteens Residential Family Centre CIC

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jan 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Sandra Jacobs-Walls

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    E13 8RF

  • Name on report verified

    Chariteens Residential Family Centre

  • URN verified

    SC474728

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • Leadership and managementInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−60Very criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrengthsconsistentseriousfailurespositivesupportivesafe
Criticisminadequateweaknessesconcernnot consistentlypoorrequires improvementdelaysconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1557w−71
  • What needs to improve666w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,213
longer than usual (typical 1680)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 26%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 1 Chariteens Residential Family Centre Chariteens Residential Family Centre CIC 10 Khartoum Road, London E13 8RF Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The centre is registered to provide parental assessments for up to six families. Alongside parenting assessments, the centre provides psychological assessments, drug and alcohol testing and counselling.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

At the time of the inspection, there were two families undergoing assessment at the residential family centre. The inspector interviewed three parents. The centre registered with Ofsted in June 2014 and the manager registered in January 2015.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre is not yet delivering good assessments, help and care for children and parents. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 16 March 2022

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 2

p.1

improvement to be good

The judgement for this outcome area is influenced by the poor leadership and management of the centre and weaknesses identified in staff’s ability to keep families safe.

p.2

improvement to be good

Families share positive relationships with staff, and are warmly welcomed when they arrive at the centre. However, some families’ stay at the centre is lengthy, with delays before the start of their assessments. The duration of some parenting assessments extends well beyond the expected 12-week assessment period. For example, a family currently staying at the centre has been at the centre for over 6 months. Delays in the completion of parenting assessments was cause for concern at the previous inspection. Managers are yet to resolve this issue.

p.2

improvement to be good

Parents say that staff are attentive, supportive and listen to what they have to say. A parent said, ‘It’s been good. I understand what the concerns were and how to make it better. I like learning; it’s good for my children and I.’ Families have good opportunities to share their views about their experiences. They understand and engage well with the assessment process.

p.2

improvement to be good

Parents take part in individual feedback meetings and residents’ meetings. This gives parents the opportunity to share their views and experiences about the centre. Staff manage complaints fairly and robustly.

p.2

improvement to be good

Families benefit from staff’s close working relationships with health care professionals. Staff encourage parents to keep key medical appointments for themselves and their children. Families promptly register with GP and health visiting services when they first arrive at the centre. Families attend weekly healthy eating sessions. As required, parents have sessions with the centre’s in-house therapist. Parents access community-based health care services, such as drug and alcohol programmes. These services help families to live healthy lifestyles.

p.2

improvement to be good

Families have good opportunities to enhance their education and remain employed if they so wish. For example, a parent is attending classes to help improve her command of English, and another parent continues to work part time while living at the centre. Toddlers attend pre-school centres. This supports their learning and development.

p.2

improvement to be good

Staff meet families’ identity needs. For example, for families for whom English is not their first language, interpreting and translation services are readily available. This includes, for example, the translation of the centre’s residents’ guide. A family also had their mid-way assessment report translated into their primary language. Staff encourage families to cook and share traditional meals from their country of origin. Staff receive training to complete PAMS (parent assessment manual) assessments. Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 3 This ensures that parents who have learning disabilities are able to fully engage with their parenting assessment.

p.2

improvement to be good

Qualified staff undertake assessments that meet the specific needs of families. These assessments include a range of methods and programmes that evaluate parents’ capacity to safely care for their children. Sessions with families address the local authority’s concerns for children’s safety.

p.3

improvement to be good

Assessment reports are of a good standard. Staff ensure that the assessment process is thorough, and they make use of a variety of assessment tools that meet the needs of children and their parents. Final reports are evaluative, analytical and evidenced based. These reports outline parents’ strengths and weaknesses and highlight their capacity for change.

p.3

improvement to be good

There are weaknesses in staff’s efforts to safeguard children and their parents. The vetting of some staff is not robust. For example, managers do not complete all staff recruitment checks. This does not confirm that all staff are suitable to work with families.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff receive training in child and adult protection policies and procedures. However, some staff do not demonstrate good enough knowledge of the action to take in the event of an allegation against a senior member of staff. This was an area of concern at the last inspection.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff do not consistently complete risk assessments that are sufficiently detailed and include strategies that help to reduce risks to children and parents. Some risk assessments fail to highlight known risks as outlined in local authority referral information. This does not demonstrate that staff are aware of or have strategies in place to address potential risks to children and their parents.

p.3

improvement to be good

The centre’s premises have recently undergone redecoration, making the centre homely and comfortable. However, the centre’s physical environment is not free from potential hazards to children. The centre’s garden contains discarded lockers and old filing cabinets. Staff confirm that these have been stored in the garden for a significant length of time. Doors to the lockers are free-swinging and pose a hazard to toddlers, should they attempt to play with the furniture.

p.3

improvement to be good

The centre’s designated smoking area is the garden . The grass area close to the garden door is littered with cigarette ends. There is no storage facility to safely collect any discarded cigarette ends. This poses a hazard to children who access the garden for play.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff are not attentive to the accommodation needs of families. Staff do not ensure that bedrooms are free from large furniture that is not in use. A family new to the centre arrived with a small cot for use with their new-born child. Two centre-owned Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 4 cots remained in the bedroom for a number of days after the family had moved in with their cot. At the time, the centre had two vacant rooms, which remained unused. This does not demonstrate that staff are sensitive to families’ accommodation needs and ensure that bedrooms remain spacious and free from unused furniture.

p.3

improvement to be good

Staff supervision and monitoring of families is consistent. There have been no allegations made against staff or any episodes of families going missing from the centre. Staff work with parents to explore the impact of risks posed to them and their children by offending behaviour, drug and alcohol misuse, and domestic abuse. Parents participate in relevant programmes that help them to reflect on their past experiences.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The leadership and management of the centre are not effective. Managers and leaders do not consistently work in partnership with local authorities. There is a lack of mutual understanding and agreement of families’ placement objectives before and after placements are negotiated. This lack of partnership working results in significant delays in families assessments commencing. This is not in children’s or parents’ best interest. Extended placements and the misuse of the centre was cause for concern at the previous inspection.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The continued misunderstanding and miscommunication between centre managers and the local authority result in managers’ poor decision-making for children and their parents. Specifically, managers’ decisions around matching. Matching decisions do not always consider the best interests of children. In one case, the experiences of young children, staying at the centre at the same time, were not positive or nurturing.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Managers do not take effective action to escalate difficult placement issues with senior managers within the local authority. This does not ensure that staff are able to appropriately challenge local authority practice that is not in the best interest of families.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Staff receive regular supervision and good support from their managers. Annual appraisals take place each year and staff have access to a training programme. However, the majority of this training is online. Staff have limited opportunities to complete face-to-face training. Managers do not consistently evaluate the effectiveness of the training programme. For example, staff complete safeguarding training, but gaps remain in their knowledge about managing allegations. This was of concern at the previous inspection.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Staff make use of surveillance equipment to help monitor parents’ care of their children. This includes CCTV. Families and other stakeholders are aware from the start of parental assessments of the centre’s use of CCTV. However, the registered manager has access to CCTV coverage off site, from her home. This practice requires review as it does not ensure that families’ rights are fully maintained, that Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 5 families are explicitly aware of this practice or that their confidentiality is guaranteed.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

Managers’ and leaders’ monitoring systems do not result in improvements to the quality of the services provided by the residential family centre. Quality of care reviews are descriptive, detailing the activities of the service. These monitoring reports are lengthy but do not provide an analysis of strengths of the service or identify areas for improvement. There is no action plan indicating what needs to happen to help drive improvement.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate

The centre’s statement of purpose has been very recently revised. However, the document requires further amendment as information about the staff team and their qualifications is not current. Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 6

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall ensure that all persons employed by him—

p.6

Requirement Due date

This specifically relates to staff training about managing allegations against staff. (Regulation 17 (5)(a)) 1 March 2023

p.6

Requirement Due date

For the purposes of paragraph (1), a person is not fit to work at a residential family centre unless—

p.6

Requirement Due date

he has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary for the work he is to perform;

p.6

Requirement Due date

he is physically and mentally fit for the work he is to perform; and

p.6

Requirement Due date

full and satisfactory information is available in relation to him in respect of each of the matters specified in Schedule 2. (Regulation 16 (3)(a)(b)(c)(d)) 1 March 2023

p.6

Requirement Due date

Subject to paragraph (6) the registered person shall ensure that the residential family centre is at all times conducted in a manner which is consistent with its statement of purpose.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered manager must not operate the residential family centre outside its registered conditions. (Regulation 4 (5))

p.6

Requirement Due date

This relates to children and parents remaining at the centre without a parenting assessment being undertaken. 1 March 2023

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall having regard to the size of the residential family centre and the number and needs of residents— 1 March 2023 Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 7 take adequate precautions against risk of accidents. (Regulation 14 (2)(g))

p.6

Requirement Due date

This relates to the removal of file cabinets, lockers and cigarette ends from the garden.

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall having regard to the size of the residential family centre and the number and needs of residents.

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall ensure the residential family centre is suitably furnished with adequate living, storage and communal space to—

p.7

Requirement Due date

meet the needs of the residents. (Regulation 14 (2)(k)(i))

p.7

Requirement Due date

This relates to the prompt removal of unused furniture from families’ bedrooms. 1 March 2023

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person shall, before providing a family with accommodation in the residential family centre, or if that is not reasonably practicable, as soon as possible thereafter, draw up in consultation with the placing authority a written plan (in these Regulations referred to as "the placement plan") setting out, in particular—

p.7

Requirement Due date

the objectives and intended outcome of the placement. (Regulation 13 (1)(b)) 1 March 2023

p.7

Requirement Due date

keep under review and where appropriate revise the statement of purpose and resident’s guide; and

p.7

Requirement Due date

notify the [Chief Inspector] within 28 days of any such revision. (Regulation 4 (4)(a)(b)) 1 March 2023

p.7

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that there is a clear and effective policy on the use of surveillance in parenting assessments. The policy should set out how the surveillance will be used to contribute to assessments, how legitimate policy will be protected and how residents will be protected from potential abuse of such measures. This relates to managers’ use of remote surveillance systems. (Residential family centres: NMS 10.1) Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 8  The registered person should ensure that staff understand the nature of records and that there is a system in place to monitor the quality and adequacy of record- keeping and take action when needed. This relates to the quality of risk assessments. (Residential family centres: NMS 20.2)  The registered person should ensure that the centre only provides admission to parents and children whose assessed needs they can expect to meet, consistent

p.7

Recommendations

with the centre’s statement of purpose. (Residential family centres: NMS 7.2)  The registered person should ensure that there is effective leadership of the centre’s staff and operation, so that the centre is organised, managed and staffed in a manner that delivers the best possible outcomes for parents and children. In particular, that there is effective communication and partnership working with local authorities. Regulation 23 quality of care reviews result in actions that improve the centre’s quality of care. (Residential family centres: NMS 12.4)

p.8

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 9

p.8

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Chariteens Residential Family Centre CIC

p.9

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 10 Khartoum Road, London E13 8RF

p.9

Inspector

Mrs Sandra Jacobs-Walls, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Chariteens Residential Family Centre 1 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion