Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care monitoring visit

Foundations Walsall

Inspected 14 Feb 2023 · URN 2681971

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Natasha Skinner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Progressive Care Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Feb 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Natasha Skinner

  • Postcode verified

    WS9 0NN

  • Name on report verified

    Foundations Walsall

  • URN verified

    2681971

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • What needs to improve207w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
233
shorter than usual (typical 566)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 46
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 19%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre - monitoring visit: Foundations Walsall 1 Foundations Walsall Parklands, 12-14 Little Aston Road, Walsall WS9 0NN

p.1

Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This service is privately run and is registered to provide parenting assessments for up to 10 families.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The registered manager has recently resigned from her post. An experienced and qualified interim manager is currently overseeing the service until a permanent manager is recruited.

p.1

Inspection date: 14 February 2023

Date of previous inspection: not applicable

p.1

This monitoring visit

The residential family centre was registered in December 2022 and this is the centre’s first inspection. The registered manager left her post with immediate effect three weeks after registration. The provider is actively recruiting for a new manager. Day-to-day management of the service is being provided by the service manager, who has been a registered manager in the past.

p.1

This monitoring visit

This monitoring visit was undertaken in response to concerns raised with Ofsted about safeguarding processes and staff sufficiency when admitting new families to the centre.

p.1

This monitoring visit

There were six families living at the centre on the day of the inspection. This reduced to five families as one family moved out the same day. Assessments were at varying stages. Two parents spoke to the inspector and shared very positive accounts of moving into the centre and their experiences so far. They reported good relationships with staff, regular support and feedback, and opportunities to engage in activities in the local community. Inspection report for residential family centre - monitoring visit: Foundations Walsall 2 Before new families are admitted to the centre this is carefully considered in partnership with safeguarding agencies and those who know the families best. Additional information and meetings have been requested to ensure that as much information as possible is available to inform the risk assessment process. However, pre-placement risk assessments are poorly recorded and do not provide the rationale

p.1

This monitoring visit

behind decision-making. It is not clear how the manager has taken account of staff’s skills and experience, and whether they have considered any further training staff may need to equip them to meet the needs of new families moving into the centre.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Minimum staffing levels are maintained to meet the needs of children and parents. However, initial plans for more experienced staff to support newer staff did not materialise. This has left some staff feeling vulnerable. Occupancy levels increased quickly and this has felt overwhelming at times for the staff team. Staff had mixed views about how prepared they were when new families moved into the centre. The manager has reflected and concluded that the pace of admitting families has been too fast. As a result, the provider has made the decision not to admit new families to the centre until the staff have been provided with a period of stability and had opportunities for further training.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Parents are given clear information about the rules and boundaries of the centre, and about their assessments. They contribute to their placement plan and understand the steps that staff will take to keep their children safe. Appropriate levels of surveillance are agreed prior to the assessment. This helps to ensure that vulnerable adults and children are safeguarded. Surveillance levels are reviewed regularly and increased or decreased in line with progress.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Risk assessments are in place for each family and these help staff to understand how to keep children and vulnerable adults safe. However, the manager has not implemented a risk assessment for lone working, in line with the organisation’s lone working policy. Consequently, staff are not provided with guidance about how to meet the individual needs of families at such times. This leaves children, parents and staff vulnerable. Inspection report for residential family centre - monitoring visit: Foundations Walsall 3

p.2

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that the overall number, competence and deployment of staff, both as a staff group and on individual shifts, can fulfil the centre’s statement of purpose and meet the individual needs of all the parents and children resident at the centre. The staffing numbers should be increased and the rota kept under review to ensure it can meet the needs of children and parents consistently. (Residential family centres: NMS 15.1)  The registered person should ensure that when only one member of staff is on duty at any time, a risk assessment has been carried out and is recorded in writing, identifying any likely risks to parents, children, staff and members of the public and how these are to be minimised. (Residential family centres: NMS 15.5)  The registered person should ensure that staff are equipped with the skills and have the experience required to meet the needs of the parents and their children

p.3

Recommendations

and the purpose of the centre. This relates to staff having sufficient support to meet the individual needs of families. (Residential family centres: NMS 16.1)  The registered person should ensure that records such as risk assessments clearly record the rationale for decision-making. (Residential family centres: NMS 20.5)

p.3

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the residential family centre since its last Ofsted inspection.

p.3

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. Inspection report for residential family centre - monitoring visit: Foundations Walsall 4

p.3

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Progressive Care Limited

p.4

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 51 Attercliffe Common, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S9 2AE

p.4

Inspector

Natasha Skinner, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre - monitoring visit: Foundations Walsall 5 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion