Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Joseph's Catholic Primary School and Nursery

Inspected 19 Jan 2023 · published 30 Mar 2023 · URN 145994

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jan 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Liz Smith, Nerrissa Bear, Nichola Pickford

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SS8 9DP

  • Name on report verified

    St Joseph's Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    145994

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−64Very criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivesafewell plannedeffectivelyaccuratelyconsistentlyimproving
Criticismnot effectivepoorconcernspoorlyinadequatedo not knownot alwaysfailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1291w−58
  • Safeguarding99w−77

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,363
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection of St Joseph's Catholic Primary School St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, Vaagen Road, Canvey Island, Essex SS8 9DP

p.1

Inspection dates: 18 and 19 January 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 18 and 19 January 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils here have a generous view of their school. They like to come to school and enjoy playing with their friends. However, pupils do not develop the knowledge and skills they need because the curriculum is poorly designed. Pupils’ knowledge and understanding are far behind where they should be. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not have their needs identified quickly and do not receive the right support. Pupils are receiving an inadequate quality of education.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

While younger pupils behave well, this is not the case for older pupils. There are occasions when a minority of pupils disrupt the learning of others. Older pupils say that they often hear offensive language and see others being aggressive at playtime and lunchtime. Pupils feel that adults do not deal with bullying or prevent it from happening. They do not trust adults to deal with poor behaviour. Some pupils say that bullying is a normal part of school life and they do not feel safe in school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy the extra-curricular activities available, such as football club and ‘children’s university’. School councillors feel that they make a difference to improving the school for their peers.

p.2

better?

Over time, trust leaders and governors have not checked carefully enough that the quality of education offered is adequate. As issues have grown, they have failed to take action to address the weaknesses in the school. Trust leaders and governors have not ensured that staff have the knowledge and skills to keep pupils safe.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not implemented a broad curriculum that prepares pupils for the next stage of their education. The curriculum from early years to Year 6 is poorly designed. Pupils do not spend enough time learning the basics in English and mathematics. As a result, they do not develop the vital knowledge they need and get confused in lessons. Leaders of these subjects do not have the time, knowledge or support they need to develop the curriculum effectively. Leaders have not set out the knowledge that they want pupils to know and remember. This means that teachers do not know what to prioritise when teaching and assessing pupils’ knowledge.

p.2

better?

While leaders have made improvements in the teaching of phonics, most pupils are significantly behind where they should be. Too many pupils do not have a secure understanding of basic phonics, meaning they cannot read simple texts. Pupils have large gaps in their knowledge that leaders have been unable to address. Weaker readers in older year groups are not given the support needed to become fluent readers. Older pupils who can read enjoy reading and talk about books that they are reading and authors that they like. 18 and 19 January 2023

p.2

3

Pupils with SEND, including children in Reception, do not have their needs identified quickly and accurately. They cannot access the curriculum fully. Staff are not well trained to identify and support pupils’ behaviour and learning needs. Pupils with SEND are often given the same task as their peers without the support they need to succeed. Pupils with SEND often become frustrated and distract other pupils from learning.

p.3

3

Staff do not have high expectations for pupils’ behaviour. Pupils do not always show positive attitudes. While children learn the routines of the classroom in Reception, older pupils do not follow expected routines. Bullying is too frequent an experience for pupils. Pupils do not trust adults to deal with behaviour issues and, as a result, do not report concerns.

p.3

3

Systems for monitoring and reviewing behaviour are not effective. While incidents of behaviour concerns are recorded, leaders do not review these incidents to identify patterns or trends. As a result, leaders do not put strategies in place to prevent incidents from reoccurring and issues continue to spiral.

p.3

3

Leaders have a curriculum for personal, social and health education (PSHE) in place. However, this is not delivered on a regular basis and lessons are often missed. As a result, pupils miss out on valuable learning, particularly older pupils. Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of risks. They know how to be safe online. Pupils learn about democracy and tolerance but have a limited understanding of other religions. This means pupils are not well prepared for their next stage of learning.

p.3

3

Trustees and governors do not know the school’s provision well. They do not monitor leaders’ work closely enough. The trust’s work to improve quality of education, support for pupils with SEND and behaviour is weak.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff know the school's safeguarding policy, including how to report concerns. However, this is not always followed, and information is not shared with the right leaders. Staff are not confident with reporting low-level concerns about pupils and, as a result, the early signs of abuse are not recognised. Leaders’ record-keeping is poor. Records do not outline how concerns are followed up, what actions have been taken or the decisions reached. Leaders do not have a clear understanding or grasp of the safeguarding information they hold, leaving pupils at risk of significant harm.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The system for reporting safeguarding concerns is inefficient and complicated. While staff recognise and record concerns, leaders’ actions to ensure the safety of 18 and 19 January 2023

p.3

4

pupils are not effective or timely. Leaders do not use the information they collect to guide their actions. Leaders must review their safeguarding systems and their own use of these so that they keep pupils safe. They must ensure the timely sharing of information and, where relevant, involvement of external agencies.  Leaders have not developed a broad and balanced curriculum that sets out clearly the knowledge that they want pupils to know and remember. Leaders have not given subject leaders the appropriate support or time to develop their curriculum. As a result, teachers are unsure what to teach and assess. Pupils do not remember what they have been taught and struggle to access new learning. Leaders should ensure subject leaders and teachers have the time and training to develop the curriculum so that pupils receive a curriculum that is well planned and sequenced.  Leaders do not have effective systems in place to identify the needs of pupils with

p.4

4

SEND. They have not ensured that staff have a clear understanding of how to support pupils with SEND. Expectations for pupils with SEND are low and the support they receive is imprecise. Leaders should ensure that they accurately identify pupils’ needs. Leaders must ensure that staff are sufficiently trained to meet pupils’ needs and make appropriate adaptations to the curriculum so that pupils with SEND learn well.  Pupils do not display the school’s values, such as respect. Older pupils are often mean and aggressive towards one another. Pupils often become frustrated in lessons and lose interest in learning. This leads to poor behaviour. Leaders urgently need to address the shortcomings of the PSHE curriculum and ensure teachers are trained to consistently apply behaviour management strategies so that pupils behave well. Leaders must ensure that they have effective systems in place to track and monitor pupils’ behaviour.

p.4

4

 Trustees and those responsible for governance do not know the weaknesses in the school’s provision. They have not challenged leaders to ensure that these are being addressed. Trustees and governors must ensure that effective action is taken to rapidly improve the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 18 and 19 January 2023

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 18 and 19 January 2023

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10255149 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.6

Information about this school

 St Joseph’s Catholic School converted to become an academy school in September 2018, joining the Assisi Catholic Trust. When its predecessor school, St Joseph’s Catholic School, was last inspected by Ofsted in May 2016, it was judged to be good overall.  The school’s denominational education and collective worship were inspected under section 48 of the Education Act in July 2016. The next section 48 inspection will take place within eight years of this date.  The trust has delegated some responsibilities for oversight of the school to a local governing body.  School leaders use one alternative provider. 18 and 19 January 2023

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.

p.7

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 The inspection began as an ungraded (section 8) inspection. This took place on 18 January 2023. Due to concerns about safeguarding and the quality of education, the inspection was deemed a graded (section 5) inspection. The second day of inspection was completed on 19 January 2023.  This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the chief executive officer from the multi-academy trust, members of the local governing body, the headteacher, the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), staff and pupils about the school’s provision.  Inspectors spoke with parents at the start of the school day.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics,

p.7

Information about this inspection

geography and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors considered the provision for PSHE and relationships, sex and health education.  Inspectors met with the SENCo and scrutinised documentation for pupils with SEND. Inspectors observed support for pupils with SEND. Inspectors spoke with leaders from the alternative provision.  Inspectors reviewed the school’s information on behaviour, bullying and attendance.  Inspectors reviewed safeguarding records and spoke with governors, leaders, staff and pupils about safeguarding arrangements.  Inspectors considered the 17 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, and the 15 free-text comments. Inspectors also reviewed the 61 pupil responses and 25 staff responses to Ofsted’s questionnaires.

p.7

Inspection team

Nerrissa Bear, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Liz Smith His Majesty's Inspector 18 and 19 January 2023

p.8

9

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

9

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

9

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

9

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

9

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion