Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

The Elms

Inspected 26 Jan 2023 · URN 2677117

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Majestic Family Services

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jan 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Vevene Muhammad

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CT11 9QP

  • Name on report verified

    The Elms

  • URN verified

    2677117

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveclearstrongexcellentconfidentpositivelypositiveambitious
Criticismerrorsconcernharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1193w+71
  • What needs to improve122w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,315
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 43
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 1 The Elms Majestic Family Services The Elms, 8 Richmond Road, Ramsgate CT11 9QP Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The centre can accommodate up to eight families. At the time of this inspection, six families were in residence. The centre offers a service to parents and children of all ages who are referred from the courts and local authorities for assessment.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The service and manager registered with Ofsted in April 2022.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: not applicable

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: not applicable Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

The service provides effective assessments, resulting in parents feeling more assured with their parenting abilities. They are confident in asking staff for advice and support. They speak positively about the assessment process, despite it being challenging for them. Parents can see the progress that they and their children are making. As a result, they are more likely to persevere with the assessment process. One parent said, ‘The difference here is crazy…I am happier here…there’s so much support.’

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents share their views, wishes and feelings at regular house meetings. Managers are responsive and take action when parents share their views. At the request of a parent, managers provided a space for staff and parents to share positive affirmations. This is well used and demonstrates that parents’ views are valued and respected.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents and children have good day-to-day experiences. Staff work to ensure that parents have opportunities to socialise together. They also encourage them to use community facilities, to help parents build relationships outside of the centre. The centre provides children with a wide range of play equipment. This promotes their growth and development. Parents work together to keep their environment comfortable and child-friendly.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Staff are sensitive to the anxieties parents feel when moving in and out of the centre. They ensure that parents are involved in these plans. There is good communication between staff and responsible authorities about the plans for parents joining and leaving the centre. For example, managers and staff worked with a responsible authority when a parent moved out in an unplanned way, to ensure the parent was supported.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parenting assessments contain relevant content and detail the parents’ capacity to care for their child. Staff track the progress parents make during the assessment, and this is well recorded. Parents know the stages of their assessment. They can comment about their progress at their reviews and during the daily feedback that they receive from staff. As a result, parents have clarity about the direction in which their assessment is going.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

There is a clear link between the assessment framework and models of attachment. The social worker showed an understanding of frameworks used when assessing parental capacity. Staff demonstrate a good understanding of attachment models and the importance of a secure base between parents and children. Staff understand what underpins their practice. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 3

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Clear and detailed information is available to staff about the welfare of children. This means they can provide parents with relevant advice on how to care for and protect their children from harm. Parents know that they are receiving guidance and being assessed on the decisions they make about the care they provide for their child. Parents understand that if there is a safeguarding concern, staff will intervene to ensure that children are safeguarded.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Risk assessments are in place. They demonstrate how levels of risk can be reduced and provide good evidence of how staff manage risks. For example, when a parent has a history of substance misuse, hair-strand tests are completed before they move in, and where required during the assessment. Staff have a clear understanding of the risks that some parents can present and they promote the safety of children and parents at the centre.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Staff provide high levels of supervision until parents show evidence of progress. There is a gradual reduction in the supervision levels where children are at less risk. Staff help and support parents to make decisions around the care of the child.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Staff work together to manage incidents that arise. For example, during this inspection a challenging situation emerged. This was managed well. The clear working together approach ensures that any parent showing distress receives support and that other parents at the centre receive reassurance.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Staff provide parents with guidance about the impact of smoking and how this can affect their child. The centre requires parents to wear smoking jackets. They are encouraged to wash their hands before handling their child after smoking. This helps to reduce child exposure to secondary smoke.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Safeguarding arrangements are in place to protect and promote the welfare of children and parents. Staff notify relevant agencies of any safeguarding incidents in a timely way. Managers and staff review and reflect on practice following safeguarding incidents to help inform decision-making in the future.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Good recruitment practices are in place. This ensures that only safe people work at the centre.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers are ambitious and are committed to the development of the centre so that children and parents receive the best possible care. They recognise the different learning styles parents may have. This includes parents with learning disabilities and other learning needs.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers ensure that assessments are complete within the expected timescale. Assessments have relevant content and the recommendations are clear. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 4 However, written reports that are provided to the court contain grammatical and typing errors. This detracts from the otherwise well-written reports.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There are several processes in place to enable managers to understand the progress that families make, including well-written logs and daily handover documentation. There are regular management meetings and audits to ensure good monitoring of progress.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers provide staff with reflective supervision sessions. These are practice-based and meets staff’s developmental needs. This area of work is a particular strength of this service. A range of training opportunities ensure the continuous development of all staff. There is a strong focus on staff well-being. Staff speak positively about the management style of the manager. As a result, staff feel valued and commited to the continued development of the service.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers know the centre’s strengths and areas for development. They take action to address them. Leaders and managers have a good relationship with their independent visitor. They respond to any recommendations made and cascade information to staff. This ensures that staff are aware of what needs to happen to make improvements and are involved in implementing the relevant changes needed.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers liaise well with a range of professionals. This ensures that the best possible care and support are provided for children and parents. There is excellent feedback from professionals. They feel confident in the work that the centre does to ensure good outcomes for families. Leaders and managers have strong working relationships with their nurse and their local police community support officer. Feedback from parents is positive.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders and managers are effective in promoting equality, diversity and inclusion. They are committed to working collaboratively with families and meeting each family’s individual needs, including religious and dietary needs. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 5

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that conclusions or recommendations are made as a result of the assessment or monitoring and that—

p.5

Requirement Due date

such conclusions or recommendations are objective and based on verifiable evidence; and

p.5

Requirement Due date

the evidence on which they are based is capable of being presented in a manner that is clear, accessible and appropriate to the persons who will need to consider them. (Regulation 13 (4)(a)(b)

p.5

Requirement Due date

In particular, ensure the written final assessment report is free from grammatical and typing errors. 4 April 2023

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 6

p.5

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Majestic Family Services

p.6

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: Atlas Chambers, 33 West Street, Brighton BN1 2RE.

p.6

Residential family centre details

Email address: amy.noone@majesticfs.co.uk

p.6

Inspector

Vevene Muhammad, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: The Elms 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion