Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Aktiva Nurseries, Oakfield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Mar 2023
- URN verified
2535490
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 382
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 20 February 2023, we received concerns that the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. On 13 March 2023, we carried out a regulatory visit. During that visit we found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We found that the provider had failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event, which is a requirement of their registration. On this occasion we will not take any further action with regard to this. However, we have served a notice to improve. This requires the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
n ensure robust risk assessments are implemented at mealtimes, to identify potential hazards, and minimise the risk of harm to children who have food allergies
p.1
Summary of outcome
n take action to ensure the deployment of staff is effective, so that children are adequately supervised to keep them safe and protect their well-being
p.1
Summary of outcome
n improve staff's knowledge and understanding of the procedures in place at mealtimes, for the safe management of children who have food allergies. On 21 March 2023, we received a response from the provider. They confirmed the key person system has been reviewed to address consistency for staff and children. Mealtimes have been revised and risk assessed to help reduce the risk of allergy contamination. Staff have been reminded of the procedure used to identify children who have an allergy or a preference at mealtimes. All staff have been asked to read the policies and procedures around mealtimes, allergies and key person.
p.1
Summary of outcome
Ofsted are satisfied with the action taken by the provider.
p.2
Summary of outcome
The provider remains registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion