Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Dudley Lodge

Inspected 9 Feb 2023 · URN SC047520

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Dudley Lodge

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Feb 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Catherine Honey, Laura Walker

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CV3 6AT

  • Name on report verified

    Dudley Lodge

  • URN verified

    SC047520

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositiveexcellentclearoutstandingconfidenthigh expectationswell supported
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings999w+88
  • What needs to improve39w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,036
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 1 Dudley Lodge Dudley Lodge Dudley Lodge Family Assessment, 143 Warwick Road, Coventry CV3 6AT Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre is registered to care for 12 families and is owned by a charity. A range of assessment models are used. Families are usually assessed from four to 12 weeks.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

In March 2020, Ofsted conducted a monitoring visit to this centre. The report is available on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The centre’s manager registered with Ofsted in November 2020.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account Good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected Good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 8 August 2018

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Children and parents receive a high quality of care, support and guidance. Parents know what is happening at each stage of their assessment and are regularly engaged in discussions about their progress. Parents describe positive relationships with staff.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families are welcomed into the centre in a sensitive manner. Where possible, parents are encouraged to visit the centre before they move in to help them to gain a better understanding of what to expect during their stay. If they are unable to visit the centre prior to their move, there are ample resources on the provider’s website both for social workers and for parents and children to use to help introduce the service.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents’ views and wishes are respected through regular one-to-one sessions with their key staff, assessment reviews and house meetings. They feel involved in their assessments and are confident that their views will be taken into account. Parents receive information throughout their assessment that is easy to understand.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents’ and children’s health needs are well understood. A weekly clinic run by local health visitors is an example of good-quality health and safeguarding practice and helps ensure that parents have regular access to health advice for their children.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents are positive about the activities available to them and their children in the centre. They enjoy using the large playroom, garden and ‘hub’. Following the COVID pandemic, increasing opportunities for families to experience activities in the community is an identified area of development for the service.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Assessment reports are evaluative and analytical. Examples are used to show how evidence supports the recommendations made. Recommendations are clear and considered. A social worker described the quality of a report as ‘excellent’.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Assessment endings are managed skilfully. When parents are unable to leave with their children, the provider works hard to ensure the ending is sensitively and empathetically managed for both parents and children.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

During the assessment process, parents receive extensive opportunities to learn how to keep themselves and their children safe. For example, there are opportunities for parents to learn about the importance of healthy personal relationships and to understand the different forms of domestic abuse. This helps them to recognise when they may be in an unhealthy relationship. Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 3 Staff have a good understanding of the trauma parents may have encountered through their lives and the negative impact that this may have on their parenting. Parents receive support to assist with their mental and emotional well-being. This may include referrals for counselling. A social worker commented that a parent’s needs were approached with ‘respect and decorum’. Staff identify and respond well to the vulnerabilities and needs of parents and their children, including their cultural

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

background and learning and language needs.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Safeguarding processes are well understood by staff, and staff are confident in following them. They advocate strongly to ensure partner agencies understand their concerns and what is in children’s best interests. Risk assessments appropriately cover identified areas of risk. They provide clear guidance for staff. Risk assessments are dynamic and are updated on a regular basis to ensure staff are clear about how to safeguard children and, where appropriate, their parents.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The recruitment of permanent staff is safe and effective. The process and checks are thorough. This helps prevent unsuitable people from having access to children or vulnerable adults.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The home environment and facilities are of good quality. Any maintenance issues reported by families are quickly rectified. Suitable health and safety measures ensure the safety of children and parents at the centre.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

A strong leadership team is in place. They have good management oversight, a clear vision and high expectations of staff practice.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There are embedded partnership arrangements with external agencies, including health professionals, placing authorities and children’s guardians. These partnerships help the centre to sustain high-quality assessment, support and protection of children and parents. The management team appropriately challenges partner agencies to ensure that families receive the best services available.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Any shortfalls in the functioning of the centre are identified and acted on. Opportunities for debriefs and reflection after safeguarding incidents or after an assessment has ended help to ensure that staff have the space to process their feelings to consider any lessons learned and think about how practice could be improved.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The residential family centre demonstrates a capacity for continuing improvement. Internal management monitoring systems are of good quality. Reports following monthly visits by the registered provider are thorough, rigorous and provide a challenge. For example, shortfalls identified through recent provider visits have led to improvements in the accident reporting policy and complaints policy. Monitoring systems are driving forward improvements in the service. The manager’s monitoring would be further enhanced by logging the unannounced ad-hoc checks undertaken at night-time. Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 4 There is a skilled, committed and well-established staff team. A wide range of training opportunities are available to staff, and staff are trained in areas of specific expertise that help to meet the individual needs of families. Team morale is usually very good, and if staff have worries or concerns, they feel well supported by

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

managers. Staff gave positive feedback during the inspection. They used words such as feeling ‘listened to’, ‘valued’ and ‘looked after’ by their employer. Staff feel well supported through a structured induction, regular supervision and reflective team meetings. Senior managers have prioritised staff well-being. Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 5

p.4

Recommendation

 The registered person should ensure that there are clear and effective procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the centre. In particular, a log should be kept of night-time management monitoring checks. (Residential Family Centres: NMS 19.1)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 6

p.5

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: Dudley Lodge, 143 Warwick Road, Coventry, West Midlands CV3 6AT

p.6

Residential family centre details

Email address: safeguarding@dudleylodge.co.uk

p.6

Inspectors

Catherine Honey, Social Care Inspector Laura Walker, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Dudley Lodge 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion