Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Green Lane Church of England Controlled Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Feb 2023
- Inspectors verified
Philippa Kermotschuk
- Postcode verified
DL12 8LG
- Name on report verified
Green Lane Church of England Controlled Primary School
- URN verified
114219
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. p.3
- are at risk of falling behind are supported effectively to catch up quickly. p.2
- It also means that the systems in place for checking what pupils know are not consistently effective. p.2
- In a small number of instances, some pupils’ needs are not met. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Curriculum plans are coherently sequenced and identify key knowledge that pupils must acquire. p.2
- Leaders have identified contextual risks that pupils need to be aware of. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that robust systems are in place to check that the curriculum is being implemented as they intend it to be. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance20
“Leaders have high expectations of pupils.” p.1Reading & phonics11
“As a result, phonics is taught consistently.” p.1Teaching & assessment4
“They have rightly prioritised the teaching of phonics and reading.” p.1Staff development4
“Leaders and governors are considerate of workload.” p.2SEND & inclusion3
“There is an inclusive culture in the school.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,280
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Green Lane Church of England Controlled Primary School Green Lane, Barnard Castle, County Durham DL12 8LG
p.1
Outcome
Green Lane Church of England Controlled Primary School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at Green Lane are confident and articulate. They feel happy and safe in school. They know that they can talk to an adult if they have worries, or they can share their worries with the school’s ‘worry monster’. Leaders have formed positive relationships with many families. Parents say they appreciate the support on offer to them from the school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Many pupils behave exceptionally well. They are polite and respectful of both each other and adults. Pupils know that bullying will not be tolerated and say that it rarely happens. When it does happen, pupils are confident that adults will deal with it quickly.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have high expectations of pupils. For the most part, these expectations are realised, and pupils achieve well. There is an inclusive culture in the school. Leaders consider pupils’ academic achievements and their wider development. Character education underpins the curriculum. Pupils are taught, for example, how to be resilient, persistent and tolerant. The school’s core Christian values are at the heart of everything that happens in the school. Pupils have opportunities to take part in community and charity work, such as making ‘happy hedgehogs’ for patients in the local hospital.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have made some significant changes to the curriculum since the previous inspection. They have rightly prioritised the teaching of phonics and reading. All staff are trained in how to teach the new phonics programme. As a result, phonics is taught consistently. A governor is also fully trained to help ensure phonics is understood and prioritised by the governing body. Pupils who are struggling with learning to read or who 7 and 8 February 2023
p.1
2
are at risk of falling behind are supported effectively to catch up quickly. Most pupils have reading books that are matched to the sounds they know. However, sometimes, pupils are given books that are too hard for them to read because they contain sounds yet to be taught. Leaders have implemented a teaching approach to develop pupils’ fluency and comprehension skills once they complete the phonics programme.
p.2
2
A love of reading is fostered as soon as children start in Reception. They have a reading den in their classroom, where they can choose to read a story to a ‘book buddy’. Staff from the local library visit to read stories, and children make their own library cards to use in the school library. A range of well-chosen books is available to children within the setting.
p.2
2
Leaders have developed an ambitious curriculum that is based on the context of the school. Curriculum plans are coherently sequenced and identify key knowledge that pupils must acquire. However, the curriculum is not consistently implemented in line with leaders’ intent. In some year groups, the key knowledge that is outlined on curriculum plans is not taught. This means that pupils cannot build on prior knowledge and will have gaps in their knowledge in the future. It also means that the systems in place for checking what pupils know are not consistently effective.
p.2
2
In the early years, leaders have a clear vision for what they want children to achieve by the end of Reception. Learning is broken down into small steps. Adults check that children have achieved these steps. This means that children are prepared well for Year 1. Children access purposeful activities that are sharply focused on the development of skills and knowledge. There are lots of opportunities for discussion. For example, children look at ‘thinking tubs’ at the start of a theme. The teaching of early mathematics is prioritised by leaders. During the inspection, children were keen to demonstrate their counting skills and used mathematical vocabulary such as ‘pictogram’.
p.2
2
Staff have recently been trained on how to improve their practice for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Most pupils with SEND access the curriculum in line with their peers. In a small number of instances, some pupils’ needs are not met. They are expected to participate in lessons where either the subject matter is too complex or they do not have the prerequisite skills and knowledge to be successful. This can lead to some low-level disruption.
p.2
2
There is a range of opportunities for pupils to develop their talents and interests. Pupils speak enthusiastically about after-school clubs such as the ‘go-getters’ club. They enjoy competing against other schools in sporting events. Pupils have opportunities to learn to play musical instruments such as the violin or the cello. The school’s ‘caring council’ gives pupils a voice and helps them to take care of their mental well-being.
p.2
2
Staff are proud to work at the school. Leaders and governors are considerate of workload. Governors are actively involved in the life of the school. They fulfil their statutory duties effectively. Leaders are proactive in seeking support from external providers, where necessary, to bring about improvements. 7 and 8 February 2023
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Safeguarding procedures in the school are robust. Leaders ensure that staff training is kept up to date. This means that staff are alert to any signs and symptoms of abuse. They know how to report and record concerns. Leaders make timely referrals to external agencies where appropriate.
p.3
Safeguarding
The single central record is maintained well. Appropriate checks are made on staff prior to their recruitment. Leaders and governors are safer recruitment trained.
p.3
Safeguarding
The curriculum teaches pupils how to stay safe online and offline. Leaders have identified contextual risks that pupils need to be aware of. They work with external partners, such as the police, to educate pupils about these risks.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The implementation of the curriculum does not always match leaders’ intent. Some key knowledge that leaders have identified is not taught. There are some instances of teachers deviating from agreed practice. This means pupils’ knowledge will not build cumulatively as they move through the school, and they may acquire some misconceptions. Leaders should ensure that robust systems are in place to check that the curriculum is being implemented as they intend it to be.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually, this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2013. 7 and 8 February 2023
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 7 and 8 February 2023
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10255812 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.5
School details
Chair of governing body Reverend Alec Harding
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 31 October 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school has undergone a leadership restructure since the last inspection. A consultation process is currently taking place in relation to the school becoming an academy. The school makes use of two registered alternative providers. The most recent section 48 inspection of the school’s religious character took place in July 2019. Following the resumption of Statutory Inspections of Anglican and Methodist Schools (SIAMS) in September 2021, the next inspection will take place within eight years of the previous inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 7 and 8 February 2023
p.5
6
The inspector held meetings with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. The inspector also met with subject leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, the chair and other members of the governing body, a representative from the local authority and a representative from the diocese. The inspector carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and history. For each deep dive, the inspector discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspector observed pupils reading to familiar adults. The inspector observed the behaviour of pupils in lessons. The inspector examined the single central record and looked at how safeguarding incidents are reported. She spoke to leaders, teachers, support staff, governors and pupils about the culture of safeguarding in the school.
p.6
6
The responses made by parents to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, were considered. This included all free-text responses. The responses to the staff questionnaire were also considered.
p.6
Inspection team
Philippa Kermotschuk, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 7 and 8 February 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion