Schools & FE · Further education inspection (EIF)
Salford and Trafford Engineering Group Training Association Limited
Summary
Alastair Mollon (lead), Andrew Scanlan, Robert Marshall-Slater, Ruth Stammers, Suzanne Wainwright
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jan 2023
- Inspectors verified
Alastair Mollon, Andrew Scanlan, Robert Marshall-Slater, Ruth Stammers, Suzanne Wainwright
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Salford and Trafford Engineering Group Training Association Limited
- URN verified
54249
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationGood
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, despite this, leaders’ processes and arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. p.2
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
- Safeguarding processes and procedures are weak. p.4
- Training for staff is not sufficiently comprehensive to ensure that they have the knowledge and understanding of how to identify and report safeguarding concerns, including about apprentices, effectively. p.4
- This remains a weakness from the previous inspection. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should urgently strengthen their safeguarding processes and procedures to ensure that apprentices are safe. p.5
- Leaders should urgently provide comprehensive training to ensure that all staff have the knowledge and understanding to identify, report and follow up safeguarding concerns effectively. p.5
- Leaders should ensure that all members of the governing body and safeguarding team are appropriately trained, experienced and qualified in safeguarding to carry out their roles effectively. p.5
- Leaders should ensure that apprentices’ knowledge and understanding of all aspects of safeguarding are developed further. p.5
- Leaders should strengthen their quality assurance processes, including for subcontractors, to ensure that they have an accurate oversight of the quality of training that apprentices receive. p.5
- Leaders should work more closely with subcontractors to develop and provide challenging and relevant curriculum content for all apprentices. p.5
- Training officers should focus on challenging apprentices to develop their knowledge and skills to a higher standard beyond the competencies demanded by their qualifications. p.5
- Training officers should plan to teach functional skills earlier in the programme in order to develop apprentices’ English and mathematical skills swiftly. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance22
“However, despite this, leaders’ processes and arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,627
- longer than usual (typical 1238)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 40
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Further education and skills inspection report
p.1
Inspection of Salford and Trafford Engineering Group Training Association Limited
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Apprenticeships Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Information about this provider
Salford and Trafford Engineering Group Training Association Limited (STEGTA) is an independent learning provider that provides training to apprentices across the country. STEGTA provides apprenticeships from levels 2 to 4. Almost all apprentices study engineering and manufacturing or construction apprenticeships.
p.1
Information about this provider
At the time of the inspection, there were 318 apprentices in learning. Almost all apprentices follow standards-based apprenticeships. The largest numbers study the level 2 engineering operative, level 3 civil engineering technician, level 3 engineering fitter or level 3 maintenance and operations engineering technician apprenticeship. The remaining apprentices follow a range of apprenticeships, including building services engineering technician, engineering design and draughtsperson, engineering technician, railway engineering design technician, and science manufacturing technician at level 3, and engineering manufacturing technician and information manager at level 4. STEGTA works with 16 subcontractors that teach either mandatory or employer-requested qualifications on most apprenticeships. Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.1
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Most apprentices enjoy their work and learning. They demonstrate a positive attitude towards their apprenticeship and a commitment to a career in engineering or construction. Apprentices recognise and value the knowledge and skills they gain in making them more employable and enhancing their career prospects. They are committed to their learning, know how to study effectively and take pride in their achievements.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Most apprentices benefit from additional learning and qualifications beyond the requirements of their apprenticeship. Many complete engineering diplomas. Level 4 engineering manufacturing technician apprentices study a higher national certificate before completing their final assessments. As a result, apprentices gain meaningful additional qualifications that are valued by employers across the sector.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Apprentices have high levels of attendance in training and at work. They are punctual. Training officers set clear expectations of professional behaviours, attendance and punctuality and reiterate these throughout the apprenticeship. Apprentices are aware of the impact that their behaviours and attitudes have on the reputation of their employers. Most apprentices routinely demonstrate professional and courteous behaviour.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Training officers, instructors and employers help apprentices to develop their character and confidence over time. They treat apprentices with respect and coach them to develop the resilience and aptitude they need in order to operate confidently in the workplace. Most apprentices become productive and competent employees.
p.2
What is it like to be a learner with this provider?
Most apprentices say that they feel safe and know how and to whom they should report any concerns. They feel confident that staff will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the training centre or the workplace. However, despite this, leaders’ processes and arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective.
p.2
better?
Leaders outline a clear rationale for the curriculum that they offer to meet the growing demand for engineers and construction professionals in the region and nationally. This ensures that employers have a pipeline of apprentices in training to meet the requirements of their businesses. Following the completion of their apprenticeships, many apprentices gain promotion or take on additional responsibilities because of the training that they have received.
p.2
better?
Leaders develop most programmes in partnership with employers very effectively. In level 2 engineering operations, they work with employers to teach the concept of fluid power using test rigs and hydraulic and pneumatic equipment so that apprentices can practise their skills on industry-standard equipment in the training centre. However, in level 3 civil engineering, leaders do not routinely include Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.2
3
employers or subcontractors in the development of the curriculum. Apprentices follow different programmes of learning provided by subcontractors, which do not always relate to their job role.
p.3
3
Training officers and instructors sequence and teach the majority of the apprenticeship curriculum effectively. Level 3 maintenance and operation engineers learn about health and safety and safe working practices before developing their hand skills, which they apply to wiring components and stripping down motors. As a result, apprentices develop their confidence and competence to perform tasks with more fluency at work. In civil engineering, training officers teach in the order that best fits the projects and roles that apprentices complete at work. For example, they teach sustainability earlier for apprentices who are working on environmental projects. Most apprentices develop their knowledge, skills and behaviours logically and incrementally throughout their apprenticeship.
p.3
3
Training officers are well qualified and experienced in the engineering and construction sectors. They benefit from regular, industry-specific update training to maintain and further develop their knowledge. Most training officers and instructors use their subject expertise effectively to coach and guide apprentices. They link apprentices’ theoretical learning to their practical skills development. However, in level 3 engineering fitting, apprentices learn the knowledge components of the apprenticeship as standalone topics and do not always benefit from timely opportunities to practise these skills at work.
p.3
3
The majority of training officers provide useful and constructive feedback to apprentices on the qualification in the apprenticeship standard. They use assessments effectively to identify and fill gaps in apprentices’ knowledge. For example, civil engineering apprentices complete several draft versions of reports and reflect on projects that they complete at work. Training officers challenge apprentices to include technical terminology and broaden their knowledge through research.
p.3
3
However, training officers and instructors place too much emphasis on the completion of tasks and the qualifications in the apprenticeship standard. They do not routinely challenge apprentices to develop their knowledge, skills and behaviours to a higher standard.
p.3
3
Most apprentices improve their English and mathematical skills during their apprenticeship. Civil engineering apprentices improve their English skills by writing technical reports using engineering terminology. They develop their mathematical skills by carrying out calculations for low-emission zones. However, in the level 2 engineering operative standard, training officers do not plan functional skills teaching early enough into the apprenticeship for those who need these. This delays the development of English and mathematical skills for a few apprentices.
p.3
3
Most apprentices make at least the progress expected of them. They produce an appropriate standard of work for their level of learning. In the few cases where Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.3
4
apprentices fall behind, training officers and employers support them effectively to catch up and complete their apprenticeship.
p.4
4
Leaders ensure that apprentices receive thorough advice and guidance at the start of their apprenticeship to ensure that they are on the right programme. Training officers discuss progression and job opportunities on an ad-hoc basis during the apprenticeship. However, apprentices do not routinely benefit from well-planned, impartial careers information about the full range of opportunities available to them beyond their current pathway and employer. They do not have the information they need to make informed decisions about their potential career choices.
p.4
4
Leaders do not provide a curriculum that routinely equips all apprentices for life in modern Britain. They do not ensure that all apprentices benefit from training on healthy relationships, healthy lifestyles or fundamental British values. Apprentices cannot recall any opportunities for trips and visits, guest speakers or training sessions on topics such as mental health. Many apprentices know how to recognise the signs of extremism, such as changes in their colleagues’ behaviour at work. However, they are less well informed about the local risks in the areas in which they live and work.
p.4
4
Leaders’ oversight of the quality of education is too reactive. They do not evaluate the overall quality of training sufficiently. Processes are disjointed and vague and do not demonstrate that leaders and managers have a thorough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of their provision.
p.4
4
Leaders have been too slow to secure effective oversight of the quality of training that apprentices receive at their subcontractors. Plans to visit and quality assure training in the training centre and at subcontractors have not routinely been fulfilled since before the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders are overly reliant on subcontractors’ own processes in evaluating the quality of training that apprentices receive. Leaders do not plan and influence sufficiently the curriculum content that subcontractors teach. Too many subcontractors choose the curriculum content without input from employers and the provider.
p.4
4
Members of the advisory board are suitably qualified for their roles. While they demonstrate an understanding of the quality of education, members of the board do not hold leaders to account sufficiently well to bring about rapid improvements.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.4
Safeguarding
Safeguarding processes and procedures are weak. Training for staff is not sufficiently comprehensive to ensure that they have the knowledge and understanding of how to identify and report safeguarding concerns, including about apprentices, effectively. When staff have identified specific potential safeguarding concerns, they do not routinely follow these up with decisive actions to ensure the safety of apprentices. This puts apprentices at risk of harm. Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.4
5
Members of the safeguarding team, who are responsible for the welfare and protection of apprentices, are not appropriately trained for their roles. Board members feel that they do not receive sufficient training on safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. Leaders do not ensure that they regularly review their safeguarding policies and procedures to incorporate relevant updates in order to protect apprentices from potential harm.
p.5
5
Leaders do not always provide sufficient information to help all apprentices understand safeguarding and the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism at the start of their apprenticeship. This remains a weakness from the previous inspection. It leaves apprentices vulnerable.
p.5
What does the provider need to do to improve?
Leaders should urgently strengthen their safeguarding processes and procedures to ensure that apprentices are safe. Leaders should urgently provide comprehensive training to ensure that all staff have the knowledge and understanding to identify, report and follow up safeguarding concerns effectively. Leaders should ensure that all members of the governing body and safeguarding team are appropriately trained, experienced and qualified in safeguarding to carry out their roles effectively. Leaders should ensure that apprentices’ knowledge and understanding of all aspects of safeguarding are developed further. Leaders should strengthen their quality assurance processes, including for subcontractors, to ensure that they have an accurate oversight of the quality of training that apprentices receive. Leaders should work more closely with subcontractors to develop and provide challenging and relevant curriculum content for all apprentices.
p.5
What does the provider need to do to improve?
Training officers should focus on challenging apprentices to develop their knowledge and skills to a higher standard beyond the competencies demanded by their qualifications. Training officers should plan to teach functional skills earlier in the programme in order to develop apprentices’ English and mathematical skills swiftly. Leaders and training officers should provide a personal development curriculum in which apprentices can participate and benefit from in order to broaden their experience beyond the requirements of their apprenticeship. Leaders and training officers should ensure that they provide impartial information, advice and guidance to apprentices throughout their programme, so that apprentices are clear about the full range of opportunities and career pathways available to them. Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.5
Provider details
Address 4th Floor Duckworth House Lancastrian Office Centre Talbot Road Stretford Manchester M32 0FP
p.6
Provider details
Principal, CEO or equivalent John Whitby
p.6
Provider details
Provider type Independent learning provider
p.6
Provider details
Date of previous inspection 28 to 29 April 2016
p.6
Main subcontractors
Luminate Education Group Leeds City College The Trafford College Group Leeds College of Building Salford City College United Colleges Group Wigan & Leigh College Activate Learning Midland Group Training Services Limited Solihull College & University Centre Riverside College Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspection team was assisted by the chief executive, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans and the previous inspection report. The inspection was carried out using the further education and skills inspection handbook and took into account all relevant provision at the provider. Inspectors collected a wide range of evidence to inform judgements, including visiting learning sessions, scrutinising learners’ work, seeking the views of learners, staff and other stakeholders, and examining the provider’s documentation and records.
p.7
Inspection team
Alastair Mollon, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector Suzanne Wainwright His Majesty’s Inspector Robert Marshall-Slater Ofsted Inspector Andrew Scanlan Ofsted Inspector Ruth Stammers His Majesty’s Inspector Limited 24 to 27 January 2023
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion