Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 Mar 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Al Mistrano

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Al Mistrano

  • Postcode verified

    SS17 8JT

  • Name on report verified

    Ortu Gable Hall School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−69Very criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearpositiveaccurately
Criticismseriousweaknessesat riskinadequateconcernsconcernnot sufficientlyharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings227w−88
  • What needs to improve696w−48

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
920
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 25%What needs to improve 75%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Gary Lewis Principal Ortu Gable Hall School Southend Road Corringham Stanford-le-Hope Essex SS17 8JT

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ortu Gable Hall School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 2 February 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in May 2022.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ortu Gable Hall School

During the inspection, I met with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, trustees and governors to discuss the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We considered the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also held discussions with pupils, toured the school to observe the quality of behaviour and looked at pupils’ work. During my visit, I looked at a range of documents, including curriculum plans, improvement plans and leaders’ evaluations of the progress made towards eliminating the school’s serious weaknesses. I also scrutinized policies, child protection records and the single central record. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Ortu Gable Hall School

Ortu Gable Hall School remains inadequate and has serious weaknesses.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the category of concern to be removed. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 Ensure that all staff are vigilant to the signs of potential harm and act upon concerns as they arise.

p.2

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 Make sure that those responsible for governance challenge leaders more robustly about leaders’ work to improve safeguarding.

p.2

designation

A new chief executive officer and a new principal took up their posts in September 2022. Trustees have also been working with the Department for Education to find a different multi-academy trust for the school. During this inspection, I focused on leaders’ arrangements for safeguarding. I also considered leaders’ progress towards offering a broad curriculum.

p.2

designation

In September 2022, leaders introduced a programme of training for leaders and staff about their safeguarding duties, with guidance about how to carry them out. Leaders developed their own understanding of government guidance about safeguarding by taking advice from external specialists. Leaders have ensured that all staff have participated in appropriate training. Leaders have assessed staff’s knowledge and understanding of their training. Leaders use this information to provide targeted training for staff who have not fully grasped something. Leaders’ records show that while more concerns are being raised about vulnerable pupils by members of support staff, and records show that leaders take appropriate action to support these pupils, this is not the case for all teachers. Although teachers have received training about their safeguarding responsibilities, records show that not all teachers record concerns when it is clear that pupils are at risk of potential

p.2

designation

harm. This includes pupils highlighted as being at risk of criminal exploitation.

p.2

designation

Leaders regularly monitor the effectiveness of staff’s use of the new approaches to safeguarding. Leaders’ monitoring, however, is not sufficiently precise to help leaders know how well they are developing an effective safeguarding culture. Leaders have not identified when staff are not vigilant to the risks pupils face. Senior leaders have not questioned why many teaching staff do not record concerns about pupils. Senior leaders have not held other leaders to account for the vigilance of teaching staff. This continues to leave vulnerable pupils at risk.

p.2

designation

Leaders and those responsible for governance have introduced a clear system for recording confidentially any concerns raised about the conduct of staff. Appropriate checks to ensure adults at school are suitable to work with children and young people are in place. Leaders ensure that the record of these checks is accurately maintained.

p.2

designation

Those responsible for governance have not placed sufficient focus on the progress leaders have made towards the development of an effective safeguarding culture. Minutes of the trust board meetings show that the board has been largely concerned with the school’s future in a different multi-academy trust. Individual governors from the local governing body have made visits to monitor leaders’ progress. On these occasions, governors have not challenged leaders robustly enough to ensure that safeguarding becomes effective. Governors have provided the challenge necessary to ensure safeguarding case files and communications with external agencies are well maintained.

p.2

designation

Leaders have taken positive steps forward to ensure pupils study a broad curriculum. It is still the case, however, that leaders do not offer a curriculum with sufficient breadth. Leaders have started recruiting specialists to offer subjects not previously taught in the curriculum. For example, staff now teach computing to pupils in Years 7 and 8. Leaders also provide opportunities for all pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) to learn a modern foreign language. Leaders have made changes to the curriculum for religious education (RE). All pupils study RE, though the curriculum plans are not coherent and this impacts upon how well RE is delivered.

p.3

designation

In September 2022, trustees secured the support of two consultants. Leaders have found the consultants’ help useful in developing the school’s improvement plan and providing an external view of the progress leaders are making towards eliminating the serious weaknesses at the school.

p.3

designation

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Ortu Federation multi-academy trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Thurrock Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion