Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Canon Slade School
Summary
Charlotte Oles (lead), Amanda Downing, Dawn Farrent, Karen Pomeroy, Kevin Sexton, Niamh Howlett
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Nov 2022
- Inspectors verified
Amanda Downing, Charlotte Oles, Dawn Farrent, Karen Pomeroy, Kevin Sexton, Niamh Howlett
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BL2 3BP
- Name on report verified
Canon Slade School
- URN verified
144044
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At times, teachers do not challenge this unacceptable behaviour as effectively as they could. p.4
- Leaders at Canon Slade High School have high expectations of what pupils and students in the sixth form can and should achieve. p.2
- Leaders have introduced a system to promote pupils’ positive behaviour, which is applied consistently by most staff. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 p.1
- Ofsted has not previously inspected Canon Slade School as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. p.1
- Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 22 and 23 November 2022 p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language8
“For example, pupils do not learn why the use of derogatory language is unacceptable.” p.3Personal development6
“Pupils receive high-quality careers advice and guidance.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,451
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Canon Slade School Bradshaw Brow, Bradshaw, Bolton, Lancashire BL2 3BP
p.1
Inspection dates: 22 and 23 November 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Ofsted has not previously inspected Canon Slade School as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders at Canon Slade High School have high expectations of what pupils and students in the sixth form can and should achieve. Most pupils and students enjoy their time at school and want to succeed. Overall, their behaviour in lessons reflects leaders’ high standards. Most pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to learning. However, over time, older pupils have not benefitted from a well-considered curriculum. Some pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Despite mostly behaving well in lessons, some pupils conduct during social times is inappropriate. Some pupils told inspectors that use of discriminatory language is common when pupils are outside of lessons. While many pupils said that staff address inappropriate language effectively, other pupils did not agree. These pupils told inspectors that some staff do not take pupils’ use of derogatory language seriously enough.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The majority of pupils feel safe in school. They value the pastoral support that staff give them. When bullying occurs, staff at the school take suitable action to address it.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders are determined that all pupils should experience life in all its fullness. For example, pupils access a range of extra-curricular activities open to all, including the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, sports clubs, book clubs and the annual school show. However, the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education curriculum is in the early stages of development. Pupils and students are not prepared well enough for life in a diverse, modern society.
p.2
better?
Leaders are in the early stages of improving the curriculum. In key stage 3, leaders have identified the knowledge that they want pupils to remember. Leaders have ordered the curriculum to ensure that pupils develop their knowledge over time. However, leaders and teachers are less clear about the essential knowledge that pupils must learn at key stages 4 and 5. As a result, some pupils, and students in the sixth form, do not build a rich body of subject knowledge across a range of subjects.
p.2
better?
Teachers deliver the redesigned key stage 3 curriculum effectively. They choose appropriate activities and high-quality resources to support pupils to learn well. However, in key stages 4 and 5, teachers’ delivery of the curriculum is hampered because they do not know precisely what to teach. Teachers do not consider how learning should be revisited and developed over time. Assessment strategies are less effective in these key stages because teachers are not clear about the knowledge that they expect pupils to remember. As a result, older pupils sometimes find it more difficult to remember and apply their prior learning. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.2
3
Leaders identify the needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively. Teachers are well trained to support pupils with SEND to learn alongside their peers. Teachers make appropriate adaptations to the delivery of the curriculum to meet the needs of each pupil. Consequently, pupils with SEND learn as well as their peers. However, due to the weaknesses in the curriculum, pupils and students with SEND in key stages 4 and 5 are hindered in their learning in the same way as other pupils.
p.3
3
Leaders are beginning to develop a programme to support those pupils who find reading more difficult. They have identified pupils in key stage 3 who have gaps in their reading knowledge. Leaders have put appropriate support in place to help pupils overcome these gaps. However, leaders have not extended this programme into key stages 4 and 5. This means that older pupils and students who find reading difficult are not receiving the support that they need to catch up quickly. This hinders how well these pupils access the wider curriculum.
p.3
3
Leaders have introduced a system to promote pupils’ positive behaviour, which is applied consistently by most staff. This means that learning is rarely disrupted. However, outside of lessons, some pupils and students described the casual use of sexist, racist and homophobic language among friends as common. Leaders have not created a culture in school where the use of this type of language is not tolerated.
p.3
3
Leaders are in the process of developing the curriculum to promote pupils’ personal development. They have not clearly defined what they want pupils to learn in each year group. In addition, leaders have not ensured that pupils and students are taught about tolerance and diversity sufficiently well. For example, pupils do not learn why the use of derogatory language is unacceptable.
p.3
3
Pupils receive high-quality careers advice and guidance. They appreciate the support that staff give them when planning their next steps.
p.3
3
Many leaders are new to their roles. Governors and trustees are supporting leaders to make positive changes to the quality of education that pupils receive. However, it is too early to measure the impact of much of this work. Staff said that leaders are mindful of their workload and well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Staff have been trained well in their safeguarding responsibilities. They are vigilant and understand the systems in place to report concerns that they may have about a pupil’s welfare. The pastoral team works closely with the safeguarding team to help keep pupils and students safe.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders ensure that concerns are referred to external agencies when necessary. This means that pupils and their families receive timely and appropriate support. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.3
4
However, at times, leaders do not record safeguarding concerns as comprehensively as they could. From time to time, this prevents leaders from having a secure overview of the patterns and trends of safeguarding concerns across the school.
p.4
4
Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe when in school and in the local community.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
The curriculum in key stages 4 and 5 is in the early stage of development. Leaders are not clear enough about the essential knowledge that pupils must gain to build on their learning from key stage 3. This hinders the learning of older pupils. Leaders should ensure that they finalise their curriculum thinking across key stages 4 and 5, so that teachers know what pupils should know and remember over time. Leaders’ plans to support older pupils who have gaps in their reading knowledge are in the early stages of development. This means that some older pupils do not read as well as they should. Leaders should ensure that they identify the deficits in these pupils’ reading knowledge and support them to catch up with their peers. The PSHE programme to support pupils’ personal development is not fully formed. Leaders have not identified the core knowledge that they want pupils to learn about citizenship, British values, and relationships, health and sex education. For
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
example, pupils do not learn about respecting and valuing diversity. Leaders should ensure that there is a cohesive programme in place to ensure that pupils are fully prepared for life in a diverse and modern society. Pupils’ use of sexist, racist and homophobic language in school is seen as acceptable by some of their peers. At times, teachers do not challenge this unacceptable behaviour as effectively as they could. Leaders should ensure that they engender a culture where this type of language is not tolerated. Leaders’ records of safeguarding concerns are not as comprehensive as they could be. This means that they are less able to spot patterns related to safeguarding with ease and speed. Leaders should develop their systems for recording safeguarding concerns, so that they are able to gain a sharper overview of trends and recurring issues.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.4
5
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10242476 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive
p.6
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1758
p.6
sixth form
Chair of governing body Canon E Nicholls
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.6
Information about this school
Canon Slade School converted to become an academy school in December 2017. When its predecessor school, Canon Slade CofE School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be outstanding overall. The school is part of the Diocese of Manchester. The most recent section 48 inspection took place in November 2017. The school is part of The Bishop Fraser Trust. Leaders use three registered alternative providers for a small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 22 and 23 November 2022
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders and staff. An inspector spoke with members of the local governing body, the chief executive officer and trustees of the multi-academy trust. An inspector also spoke with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the diocese. Inspectors spoke to pupils and students about their experiences of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ and students’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes. Inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including leaders’ self-evaluation documents, improvement plans, minutes of governing body meetings, minutes of
p.7
Information about this inspection
trust board meetings and records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance. Inspectors checked the school’s safeguarding policies and procedures and the school’s single central record. Inspectors met with leaders, staff, pupils and students to evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, science, mathematics, geography, design and technology and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers and some pupils and students about their learning, and looked at samples of pupils’ and students’ work. Inspectors also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in some other subjects. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View and the responses to Ofsted’s surveys for pupils and staff.
p.7
Inspection team
Charlotte Oles, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Dawn Farrent Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 November 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion