Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Ashbrow School

Inspected 25 Jan 2023 · published 20 Mar 2023 · URN 107628

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Liam Colclough (lead), Chris Jennings, June Richardson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jan 2023

  • Inspectors verified

    Chris Jennings, June Richardson, Liam Colclough

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Ashbrow School

  • URN verified

    107628

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−10Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivecleareffectivestrongfeel safeswiftlylovewell supported
Criticisminconsistenciesconcernspoorlyweaknessesdeclinedinsufficientnot securenot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1353w−14
  • Safeguarding119w+14
  • What needs to improve31w—

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,467
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 56
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection of Ashbrow School Ash Meadow Close, Sheepridge, Ashbrow School, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD2 1EX

p.1

Inspection dates: 24 and 25 January 2023

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 24 and 25 January 2023

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Since the last inspection, the standard of education that children receive declined. Current leaders have made changes in the school which are beginning to make a difference. They have raised expectations of pupils’ learning and behaviour by introducing a new behaviour policy and a redesigned curriculum. Some of these changes are beginning to have a positive impact on the experience of pupils. However, some of the changes that leaders have made are not fully embedded. The curriculum in the early years does not give children a strong start in their education. Some changes have been made very recently in this area but there has been insufficient time to see what impact this has made on children’s learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe in this school. Relationships are built on trust. Pupils understand and act according to the school values of ‘care, respect and kindness’. They know that adults will support them if they have worries. There are positive relationships between staff and pupils. Pupils have positive attitudes to learning. Staff establish clear expectations for how pupils should behave. Pupils feel listened to and feel cared for. They understand what bullying is and how to spot it. Pupils show respect and manners, and look for opportunities to help each other. Incidents of bullying or inappropriate language are infrequent, but when they do happen, leaders deal with them swiftly. Pupils who need support to regulate their emotions receive targeted and effective support. Pupils love to access the newly developed outdoor learning area.

p.2

better?

Leaders have recently undertaken work to raise the ambition in the curriculum for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Subject leaders have considered themes and concepts they wish pupils to learn about. In some subjects, such as art, the precise knowledge and vocabulary that leaders want for pupils to have are clear, but in others, such as geography, this is not as clearly defined. In curriculum subjects where the knowledge and vocabulary are less clearly defined, sometimes, teachers do not give pupils learning experiences that help them build their knowledge over time. Teachers check pupils’ understanding in lessons. However, these checks do not precisely give them the information they need about gaps that pupils may have in their understanding from previous parts of the curriculum.

p.2

better?

Curriculum subject leaders regularly check how well their subjects are mapped out in each year group from term to term and year to year. These checks tell leaders what subject knowledge is being taught and what pupils’ attitudes are to these subjects. However, the checks that leaders make on their subjects do not enable them to quickly identify and address areas where lesson content could be further developed to help pupils to learn the crucial knowledge identified. 24 and 25 January 2023

p.2

3

Leaders have chosen a phonics curriculum which enables pupils to learn the sounds of letters that they need to know, in an appropriate order. The books that pupils are given to read match the phonic knowledge that they have learned. Staff have received training to teach pupils how to read. Pupils who need additional help with reading are identified and supported. However, in phonics lessons and the catch-up sessions, there are inconsistencies in the way that teachers teach pupils to read. Pupils are not shown how to recognise letters and read words in the same way.

p.3

3

Children in the early years do not get the start to their education that they deserve. The curriculum they experience is underdeveloped and poorly understood by the staff delivering it. Children do not have opportunities to develop their vocabulary. Interactions between staff and children vary in quality. Many interactions do not support children to learn. Routines are not well established. Children do not have the opportunities they need to become independent and resilient learners. Leaders have recently started to address these weaknesses in the early years. However, these changes are at the very earliest stages and it is too soon to measure the difference that this is making for children.

p.3

3

Leaders have ensured that the personal development offer for pupils is meaningful and appropriate to the context of the community they live in. Older pupils are able to talk in detail about how the ‘Awareness Curriculum’ that leaders have developed has helped them to understand and be aware of risks such as gangs and drugs. They talk maturely and sensibly about what they would do if they faced these circumstances outside of school. Pupils know about the main world faiths and have a clear understanding of different family structures and protected characteristics.

p.3

3

Governors are clear in their commitment to safeguarding. They make checks to ensure that what leaders are telling them is reflective of what is happening in school. They have systems to check that the money received through the pupil premium and sports premium funding makes a difference to pupils’ education and fitness. Staff feel well supported by governors and senior leaders in relation to their workload and well-being.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff have a strong understanding of the local safeguarding risks to pupils. There are clear systems for staff to share concerns. Leaders act on these concerns swiftly. Staff receive regular training and updates to understand the safeguarding policy updates and particular risks within the local community. Leaders work with external agencies to provide more targeted help for families and pupils. Pupils are taught about how to keep themselves safe. They are given important information about issues which are likely to affect them in the community, such as knife crime and gangs. Pupils talk about how this knowledge helps them to be aware of the world beyond the school. 24 and 25 January 2023

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 The early years curriculum is not clearly defined. As a result, children do not have meaningful experiences across the seven areas of learning and are unprepared for their learning in key stage 1 and beyond. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum children experience is clearly defined and understood by staff so that children are able to build their skills, knowledge and learning behaviours during their time in the early years and be better prepared for key stage 1.  There are inconsistencies in the teaching of early reading. As a result, all pupils, but particularly those who are the lowest attainers, do not receive the precise teaching or targeted support that they need to become fluent readers. Leaders should ensure that the checks leaders make on the teaching of early reading quickly identify and address these inconsistencies in both group phonics and catch-up support sessions.  In foundation subjects, leaders have not defined with clarity the knowledge and

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

vocabulary that they wish for pupils to learn and have not subsequently considered the order in which this needs to be taught, so that pupils build their knowledge over time. As a result, in some foundation subjects, teachers choose activities which are not designed to support learning as effectively as they could. Leaders should ensure that there is a shared understanding of the knowledge and vocabulary that pupils will learn, and the order in which this should be taught, so that pupils are able to retain and build on this knowledge over time.  The checks that teachers make on pupils’ understanding in lessons across the curriculum do not identify precisely the gaps in pupils’ knowledge. As a result, pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to revisit the aspects of the curriculum where their knowledge is not secure. Leaders should ensure that teachers use accurate assessment to identify what curriculum content pupils need to learn

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

next, or need to revisit to secure their knowledge.  Curriculum subject leaders do not use the information they gain from monitoring their subjects to support teachers to teach their lessons. As a result, some lesson activities do not closely match the intended knowledge that is mapped out across the curriculum. Subject leaders should ensure that they identify and remedy any inconsistencies in how well lesson content will enable pupils to learn the crucial knowledge they need, step by step, in each subject.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection. 24 and 25 January 2023

p.4

5

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 24 and 25 January 2023

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10210958 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 27 and 28 September 2016, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspector(s) carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with school leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation.  During this inspection, inspectors met with senior leaders from across the school.  Inspectors spoke with the chair of the local governing body and several other governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in reading, mathematics, geography, science and art. For each deep dive, the inspectors met with subject leaders, reviewed curriculum plans, looked at pupils’ work, visited lessons, spoke to teachers and spoke to pupils about their learning. 24 and 25 January 2023

p.6

7

 Inspectors listened to pupils reading to a familiar adult and met with pupils formally in both same sex and separate groups.  Inspectors considered the views of parents through informal discussions at the beginning and end of the day and through Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View.  The inspection team spoke to representatives from the local authority.

p.7

Inspection team

Liam Colclough, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

June Richardson Ofsted Inspector 24 and 25 January 2023

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion