Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School

Inspected — · published 15 Mar 2023 · URN 123802

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lydia Pride

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lydia Pride

  • Postcode verified

    TA3 6EG

  • Name on report verified

    Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+15Mostly positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserapid progresswell-sequencedsupportiveeffectivelyimprovedpreciselyswiftlyimproving
Criticismgapsweaknessesrequires improvementnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings512w+10
  • What needs to improve63w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
573
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Barney Rycroft Interim headteacher Stoke St Gregory Church of England Primary School Stoke St Gregory Huntham Lane Taunton Somerset TA3 6EG

p.1

England Primary School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 20 January 2023, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

England Primary School

During the inspection, I discussed with you and other senior leaders, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also carried out visits to lessons and held meetings with subject leaders. I considered a range of documents, including the school improvement plan. I met with pupils to discuss their learning and heard a selection of pupils read. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

work is necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

The school should take further action to:

p.1

improvement. Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more

 ensure that the support for pupils in key stage 2, who are in the early stages of reading, is precisely focused on the gaps in their knowledge; and  provide a well-sequenced curriculum which helps pupils to gain detailed knowledge in each of the foundation subjects.

p.1

Main findings

An interim headteacher joined the school in November 2022, as part of a supportive arrangement with The Oak Partnership Trust, a multi-academy trust. As part of the same arrangement, a special educational needs coordinator has joined the school on a temporary basis.

p.2

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, leaders have acted swiftly and effectively in order to improve the quality of the curriculum for early reading. Children now make rapid progress in the Reception Year. However, there is not a sharp enough focus on remedying the gaps in pupils’ phonics knowledge for pupils in key stage 2 who continue to find reading difficult. Leaders have strengthened the curriculum in several other subjects, including personal, social and health education and physical education. Nevertheless, it is not yet the case that the curriculum in every subject is designed well.

p.2

Main findings

Curriculum leadership is improving. Increasingly, subject leaders are planning how they can best support all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, to know and remember more. The interim headteacher provides assured leadership. This is helping staff to put improved systems and processes into place. For example, the impact of the curriculum is now evaluated more rigorously. Governors are considerate of staff workload, given the rapid pace of change. Leaders and governors are working constructively together to address the school’s weaknesses.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have received support from the Somerset Literacy Network. They have used this guidance to improve the curriculum in both early reading and English. The Oak Partnership Trust provides considerable support for the leadership of the school. Governors ensure that this additional capacity is put to good use. As a result, the rate of improvement has increased significantly.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Bath and Wells, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion