Early years · Early years complaint outcome
Childminder in Westminster
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
16 Feb 2023
- URN verified
155029
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 383
- longer than usual (typical 281)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 42
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of outcome
All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 21 November 2022, we received concerns that the provider might not be meeting some of these requirements.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 22 November 2022, we carried out a regulatory visit. We found the provider was not meeting some of the requirements. We found that the provider had failed to follow safeguarding processes, including notifying the relevant agencies about matters affecting the suitability of adults living and/or working at the premises in a timely manner. The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.
p.1
Summary of outcome
We suspended the provider's registration on 24 November 2022 because we believed children may be at risk of harm. The purpose of this suspension was to allow time for the circumstances to be investigated and for steps to be taken to reduce or eliminate the risk of harm. The provider had a right to appeal against the suspension. The provider could not provide childcare for which registration is required while a suspension is in place and may have committed an offence if they did so.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On 15 February 2023, we concluded that the provider was no longer suitable to remain registered as a childcare provider. We commenced steps to cancel their registration and issued a notice of intention to the provider about this. The provider had a right to appeal against our intention to take these steps.
p.1
Summary of outcome
On the 23 February 2023, the provider notified us of their wish to resign their registration. Consequently, we lifted the suspension to allow us to resign their registration. Because the provider has chosen to resign, we are no longer taking steps to cancel their registration.
p.1
Summary of outcome
They are no longer a registered childcare provider with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints on our website for a period of five years.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet .
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion