Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)
Regents Park Community Preschool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Regents Park Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP905013
- Inspection date verified
9 Feb 2023
- Inspectors verified
Melissa Cox
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
SO15 4PF
- Name on report verified
Regents Park Community Preschool
- URN verified
131554
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A lack of committee oversight and ineffective leadership has led to a decline in standards since the last inspection. p.2
- Overfamiliarity had led to complacency, resulting in failures to report concerns to statutory agencies as required. p.3
- Staff's poor attitude to ensuring children's needs are met does not foster a strong foundation for children to develop their self-worth or learn that they are valued. p.3
- Ineffective leadership by managers and lack of oversight by the committee does not ensure that children are kept safe. p.2
- They are not well supported by staff to develop friendships and fail to make the progress they are capable of. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff fail to extend children's vocabulary or model words for children who need to develop their pronunciation and gain confidence in speaking. p.3
- 9 February 2023 ensure that effective arrangements to support children with SEND are implemented in accordance with the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice so that children with SEND are identified early and that they receive the targeted support and intervention they need to fulfil their potential 02/03/2023 p.4
- create a curriculum that has clear intentions for what children need to learn, and ensure staff know and understand this so that they provide effective teaching in line with children's individual needs 04/05/2023 p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,349
- longer than usual (typical 972)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Regents Park Community Preschool Tanners Brook Community Room, Elmes Drive, Regents Park, Southampton, Hampshire SO15 4PF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
Children's safety is not assured. Ineffective leadership by managers and lack of oversight by the committee does not ensure that children are kept safe. Staff have limited ambition for children's learning, which is detrimental to children's well-being and the levels of progress they make. Children, particularly those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) and children who have fallen behind in their learning, fail to receive the education they deserve. The committee does not demonstrate the capacity to bring about the necessary change, despite intensive support from the local authority.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Staff, including managers, do not understand how to meet children's individual learning needs successfully. They provide a basic range of activities that do not capture children's attention or motivate them to learn new things. Children receive very little individual adult attention in the day and are left to occupy themselves. This presents a challenge, as many children lack confidence in social situations. Children frequently play on their own. They are not well supported by staff to develop friendships and fail to make the progress they are capable of.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Managers recognise that children's language and social development have been adversely impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, they take little action to create a language-rich environment so that children can become confident communicators. Staff speak infrequently to children. Some children complain of being bored and ask to go home. There is limited support for children's emotional well-being and, at times, this leads to a decline in their behaviour. Children are not well supported to manage conflict or understand how to manage their feelings.
p.2
need to do better?
n A lack of committee oversight and ineffective leadership has led to a decline in standards since the last inspection. Lines of accountability are unclear. The committee does not monitor the performance of managers or call them to account for weaknesses in practice. Funding, including one-to-one funding and early years pupil premium, has not been used effectively to improve outcomes for children. The committee has failed to notify Ofsted of significant events, as required. This includes changes to the committee so that the required suitability checks can be carried out for the appointment of new managers. n Managers do not demonstrate the necessary skills or knowledge to fulfil their roles and responsibilities effectively. There has been a decline in standards since managers came into post. Significant weaknesses in safeguarding and the quality of provision for children with SEND are identified; both areas of the
p.2
need to do better?
provision that managers hold direct responsibility for. Managers fail to identify or
p.2
need to do better?
9 February 2023 ensure plans for improvement are shared with staff or the committee. They do not offer staff support to improve their personal effectiveness. Managers hold an inaccurate evaluation of the quality of the provision overall. They do not demonstrate the skills or motivation to bring about the urgent improvements that are required. n The provision for children with SEND is weak. Managers, including the named special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), demonstrate limited capacity to work with other professionals, who have offered specialist support and advice. Managers fail to implement specialist recommendations or prepare timely records and assessments, as required. This has led to a delay in referrals for some children, placing them at a significant disadvantage in their education. Parents and carers report positively on the provision. However, a lack of transparency in information sharing does not ensure that parents and carers get
p.2
need to do better?
accurate information about their child's learning. n Staff lack an understanding of what they want children to learn. There are very few planned activities provided, and children struggle to engage in any meaningful learning. Staff do not interact purposefully with children, to support their learning needs. Their interactions are supervisory at best. At times, the environment is chaotic and noisy, and children's access to resources is limited. For example, on the day of the inspection, the floor was covered with recycled food packaging for much of the day, with little else on offer. Staff fail to extend children's vocabulary or model words for children who need to develop their pronunciation and gain confidence in speaking. n Staff do not support children's emotional well-being successfully. Many children lack confidence in social situations and are not able to communicate their needs well. Infrequent attention and inconsistent attempts to manage children's
p.3
need to do better?
behaviour do not support children to learn right from wrong. Staff's poor attitude to ensuring children's needs are met does not foster a strong foundation for children to develop their self-worth or learn that they are valued. Children gain some benefit from play in the garden. They show skill as they ride around on bikes. Staff provide healthy snacks. However, they do not promote children's understanding of healthy food choices or good oral health well overall.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The designated safeguarding lead (DSL) demonstrates a poor understanding of their role and responsibilities. They provide inaccurate advice to staff when they raise concerns about children and do not take timely action when this is required. Managers fail to ensure the ongoing suitability of staff. They investigate concerns without referral to safeguarding partners. They do not know the correct procedure to follow in the event of an allegation against a member of staff. Staff have a weak knowledge of early thresholds and the role that other agencies play. They fail to keep robust records of concerns and are resistant to working in partnership with other agencies to safeguard children and promote their good health. The safeguarding policy does not reflect the local safeguarding partners (LSP) guidance
p.3
Safeguarding
9 February 2023 as required. Managers step outside their professional safeguarding roles. Overfamiliarity had led to complacency, resulting in failures to report concerns to statutory agencies as required.
p.3
Due date
take immediate action to notify Ofsted of changes to the committee so that the required suitability checks can be completed 20/02/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure the safeguarding policy and procedure is in line with LSP guidance and is shared with staff so that support is identified for families at the earliest opportunity 02/03/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff, including the DSL, understand the safeguarding policy and procedures and act on safeguarding concerns in a timely way, with particular regard to responding to information linked to staff suitability and significant changes in children's behaviour 02/03/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure all staff, including the managers, receive regular and effective support, coaching and training, in order to fulfil their roles, and are provided with opportunities to discuss any issues, particularly concerning children's development or well-being, including child protection concerns 02/03/2023
p.4
Due date
ensure there is a qualified manager in place who has sufficient knowledge, skills and capabilities to carry out their role and responsibilities effectively 02/03/2023
p.4
Due date
9 February 2023 ensure that effective arrangements to support children with SEND are implemented in accordance with the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice so that children with SEND are identified early and that they receive the targeted support and intervention they need to fulfil their potential 02/03/2023
p.4
Due date
maintain records and obtain and share information in a timely way with parents, carers other professionals working with the child, including social services and Ofsted, as necessary, to ensure the safe and efficient management of the setting and to help ensure that the needs of all children are met 02/03/2023
p.5
Due date
ensure the committee has a clear understanding of its roles and responsibilities and monitors the provision effectively to identify any breaches of requirements and to make sure that staff, including managers, fulfil their roles successfully 02/03/2023
p.5
Due date
implement a consistent behaviour policy that helps staff understand how to intervene positively to support children's behaviour, including at times when children are having difficulty managing their feelings and emotions. 02/03/2023
p.5
Due date
create a curriculum that has clear intentions for what children need to learn, and ensure staff know and understand this so that they provide effective teaching in line with children's individual needs 04/05/2023
p.5
Due date
9 February 2023 implement an effective curriculum for communication and language so that children benefit from a language-rich environment and make a faster rate of progress in this area of their development in readiness for school. 04/05/2023
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number 131554 Local authority Southampton Inspection number 10266593 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.7
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care
p.7
inspection
Total number of places 28 Number of children on roll 26 Name of registered person Regents Park Pre-School Committee
p.7
reference number
Telephone number 023 80703571 Date of previous inspection 29 June 2018
p.7
Information about this early years setting
Regents Park Community Preschool registered in 1989. It is located in Millbrook area of Southampton. The pre-school is open Monday to Friday, from 8.15am to 3.45pm, during school term times and offers a morning session, a lunchtime session and an afternoon session. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. There are four staff employed to work with the children, of whom two hold early years qualifications to level 3 and one member of staff holds a qualification to level 6 and qualified teacher status.
p.7
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n The inspector spoke with the SENCo about how they support children with SEND. n The manager and inspector discussed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors. n The inspector spoke to several parents and grandparents during the inspection and took account of their views. The inspector also spoke to children, to find out about their time at the setting. n Documentation, including evidence of the suitability of staff, was reviewed.
p.8
Inspection activities
n The inspector spoke with the nominated individual about the leadership and management of the setting.
p.8
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.8
Inspection activities
9 February 2023 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.9
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion