Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Benjamin UK Ltd in Central Bedfordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Benjamin UK Limited
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Feb 2023
- Inspectors verified
Lynne Drage
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Name on report verified
1269505
- URN verified
1269505
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must ensure that all employees— p.6
- The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for the children ("a quality of care review") at least once every 6 months. p.6
- The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective and clear recording. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“The effectiveness of leaders and managers good” p.1Progress & outcomes3
“The children are making good progress in this calm and nurturing home.” p.3Communication & language2
“I can talk to them, and they listen to me.’” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,098
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 1 Registered provider: Benjamin UK Limited Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This privately owned home provides a therapeutic model of care and education for up to four children who have had adverse childhood experiences. There is a Department for Education-registered school on site that is run by the provider. The inspector only inspected the social care provision on this site.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager has been in post since January 2023 and is in the process of registering with Ofsted.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of last inspection: 9 February 2022
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
09/02/2022 Full Good 09/05/2019 Full Good 03/01/2019 Interim Declined in effectiveness 25/09/2018 Full Good Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 3
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Two children have moved out of the home since the last inspection and three children have moved in. At the time of the inspection, four children were living at the home. The children are making good progress in this calm and nurturing home.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff are good role models for the children. Much work has been carried out to increase children’s confidence and self-worth. One child regularly attends a local gym, and another child now wears age-appropriate clothes. Improving health and body image increases children’s self-esteem.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children make good progress in their education in relation to their complex starting points. Three of the children attend the provider’s on-site education facility. One child has a bespoke education package and is supported by staff to engage. Staff have high aspirations for the children and regularly discuss their future goals with them.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Hobbies and activities are supported well. A reward scheme encourages children to aim for a regular special activity. Three of the children enjoy weekly horse-riding lessons that they have chosen through the reward scheme. Other activities include swimming, bowling and going to the cinema. These activities increase children’s social skills.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Weekly children’s meetings are well attended. Staff use this time to gain the children’s views regarding the running of the home. This ensures that the children’s opinions are known, and they are fully included in any decisions made.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Independence skills are encouraged. Children know how to do their own laundry, keep their bedrooms tidy and develop cooking skills. An older child is following a pathway plan to help prepare them for their future. Staff understand the importance of children learning vital skills that will enhance their adult lives.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
All the children said that they feel safe. The staff provide consistent structure to children’s days and build trusting relationships with them. A child said, ‘I know staff care about me. I can talk to them, and they listen to me.’
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
There have been no physical interventions because the staff are successful at de- escalating incidents. Staff have meaningful conversations with the children to discuss their feelings and gain their views. These conversations help staff to understand how to support each child at times of distress.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Some of the children have significant histories of going missing from home. One child had been missing for a number of weeks before moving to the home. Periods Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 4 of children going missing have reduced. Each child has an individual plan and the staff follow the procedures well. Every attempt is made to ensure that when a child goes missing from the home they are located promptly. Staff are proactive in searching the local area and they work closely with the police to facilitate the child’s safe return.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Improvements have been made to internet safety. When a child moves into the home, their use of mobile devices is discussed and appropriate restrictions are agreed. Staff monitor children’s internet access. Children who may struggle to comprehend online dangers have basic mobile phones that do not have internet access.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The children have good-quality individual risk assessments. These are detailed and updated after any incident or new behaviour. Staff understand the vulnerabilities of each child and follow this guidance well.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff focus on rewarding the children’s positive behaviour. The staff rarely use consequences but when these are used they are fair and proportionate. However, two consequences have been recorded incorrectly. This compromises the effectiveness of the manager’s oversight.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager recently left the home. The deputy manager has been appointed acting manager and is in the process of applying to register with Ofsted. There has been a good handover of duties and the home remains well managed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The dedicated staff are complimentary about both the previous manager and the new manager. They say that they feel valued in their roles and appreciate the support made available to them.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The manager has developed strong relationships with external professionals. The children’s social workers said that communication is particularly good. They receive regular good-quality reports and are promptly informed of any incidents. They describe the manager as proactive and consistently working in partnership to improve outcomes for children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Monthly staff team meetings are well attended. The provider’s therapeutic manager works closely with the home and provides an additional monthly meeting. These meetings are effective and enable staff to increase their understanding of the children’s individual needs and provide guidance that informs their practice.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
New staff receive a comprehensive induction to help develop their skills. Staff receive regular good-quality supervision that enables them to reflect on their practice. However, some of the staff have not received an annual appraisal to support their continued professional development. Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 5 The manager has undertaken a review of the quality of care. The reports are detailed and are a useful tool to aid development of the home. However, one of the reports was not submitted to Ofsted as required. This hinders Ofsted’s ability to monitor the home. Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 6
p.4
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that all employees—
p.6
Requirement Due date
have their performance and fitness to perform their roles appraised at least once every year. (Regulation 33 (4)(c)) 31 March 2023
p.6
Requirement Due date
The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for the children ("a quality of care review") at least once every 6 months.
p.6
Requirement Due date
supply to HMCI a copy of the of the quality of care review report within 28 days of the date on which the quality of care review is completed. (Regulation 45 (1) (4)(a)) 31 March 2023
p.6
Recommendation
The registered person should ensure that staff are familiar with the home’s policies on record-keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective and clear recording. (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4)
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people, using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 7
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Benjamin UK Limited
p.7
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Coach House, White House Court, Hockliffe Street, Leighton Buzzard LU7 1FD
p.7
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Claudette Rudman
p.7
Inspector
Lynne Drage, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for children’s home: 1269505 8 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion