Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Fordham All Saints Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 30 Nov 2022 · published 9 Mar 2023 · URN 115078

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Michael Williams, Nicola Shadbolt

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CO6 3NN

  • Name on report verified

    Fordham All Saints Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    115078

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−41Criticalmore positive than 30% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyeffectivelyoutstandingsuccessfullysafeproudconfidentfeel safe
Criticismconcernslacknot alwaysinconsistenciesnot effectivenot consistentlyat riskserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1344w−27
  • Safeguarding110w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,421
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 53
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection of Fordham All Saints Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Mill Road, Fordham, Colchester, Essex CO6 3NN

p.1

Inspection dates: 29 and 30 November 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The school was last inspected 14 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Mostly, pupils enjoy their lessons at Fordham All Saints. They enjoy learning about different religions and the topics they study in history. Pupils show respect and understanding of people who are different to them. Pupils like having opportunities to share their own views and beliefs. They know these will be respected in school. Pupils are proud to represent the school in sporting events such as football tournaments.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils behave well during some lessons and in the school dining hall. Though most pupils understand the new expectations for their behaviour, staff apply them inconsistently. This shows in a small minority of pupils who disrupt the learning of others by calling out during lessons and in how a small number of pupils respond to and treat staff in the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils know there are staff they can talk to if they are worried about something. They are confident staff will help them to deal with any problems they have. This includes when pupils fall out with friends or are worried that bullying is happening. So, pupils feel safe in school. However, leaders do not manage safeguarding concerns well enough. This puts pupils at risk of harm outside of school.

p.2

better?

Leaders, including those responsible for governance, have not ensured they adhere to statutory duties when recording and following up on concerns about pupils. Leaders do not always check up on concerns and actions to be taken or, if they do, they do not do this swiftly enough to safeguard pupils well. The local authority has established an improvement board to support governors. However, there is a lack of rigour in the monitoring of safeguarding processes and new initiatives to support school improvement that leaders have introduced in the school.

p.2

better?

Leaders have recently updated the curriculum. However, some of these changes have not been managed well. Some teachers do not use effective checks on pupils’ understanding of what they have learned. This means that there are gaps in pupils’ knowledge. Pupils also have misconceptions. Some teachers do not adapt their teaching to account for what pupils have learned before. Some pupils lack the knowledge and skills they need to access current learning.

p.2

better?

Similarly to the rest of the school, in early years, what children know and remember is not checked well enough to accurately inform future learning. Where children complete activities matched to what they know and can do, they achieve better. However, there are occasions where the activities teachers plan are not precisely matched to children’s previous learning. This means children do not get the opportunity to secure and build on new learning.

p.2

better?

Where subject leaders are new to post, they have not identified issues about how effectively teachers check what pupils know in their monitoring. So, teachers have Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.2

3

not received the support they need to teach the new curriculum successfully.

p.3

3

Leaders have recently introduced new approaches to the teaching of early reading. As with the rest of the curriculum, staff require support to adapt the curriculum to the needs of all pupils. When they teach sounds and words, they do not always spot those pupils not joining in. This makes it hard for these staff to know if all pupils are keeping up with the learning. Children in the early years begin learning to read straight away. They quickly learn the sounds that letters make. Children have opportunities to listen to stories and rhymes and this helps to develop their vocabulary. Teachers identify pupils who find reading difficult. Pupils then receive support to help them read fluently.

p.3

3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) experience the same issues in the curriculum as their peers. However, some of the targeted support pupils receive works better. This is because the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) trains staff well to support pupils with SEND. The SENCo actively seeks help from other professionals. Staff use advice and strategies offered by these professionals effectively in class. For example, they use specific interventions to help pupils develop their confidence and resilience.

p.3

3

Alongside changes to the curriculum, leaders have recently introduced new policies and procedures for managing pupils’ behaviour. Leaders have not checked how well they are working. This means they do not have a clear understanding of some of the inconsistencies in behaviour that exist and where pupils’ behaviour is not as good as it should be.

p.3

3

Leaders are extending how they promote pupils’ personal development. They have had success with this. Pupils understand what healthy relationships are. Pupils relish the opportunities they have to hold positions of responsibility. They develop their confidence in speaking in front of an audience by presenting speeches as prospective school councillors and house captains. This also helps to teach pupils about democracy. Prayer leaders enjoy the opportunities they get to lead collective worship.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

There are serious weaknesses in leaders’ following of statutory duties to keep pupils safe. Safeguarding records relating to concerns raised about pupils do not meet statutory requirements. Leaders do not consistently record the actions they take to keep pupils safe. This means it is unclear whether there has been any follow-up on concerns raised by staff. In some instances, pupils and staff then raise the same concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure they complete all required pre-employment checks on adults when they join the school. Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.3

4

The curriculum content ensures pupils are taught how to keep safe, including when online.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders do not follow statutory guidance for keeping children safe. Safeguarding records are not clear and comprehensive and do not detail how concerns are followed up. Leaders must ensure that all concerns are followed up and that actions taken are appropriate, done swiftly and recorded accurately.  There is a lack of rigour in how governors monitor the curriculum and wider school systems, such as attendance and safeguarding. This means governors cannot assure themselves that school leaders’ evaluation is accurate and their plans for school improvement are working well. Governors must ensure they receive the training that allows them to determine how best to challenge and support school leaders to effect change successfully.  Assessment is not used consistently well across the school, including in early years, to identify what pupils know and can do. This means that teachers do not identify and address where pupils are less secure in their understanding or have

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

misconceptions. Leaders must ensure that all teachers know how to check pupils’ understanding effectively to plan learning that builds on pupils’ prior knowledge and addresses any misconceptions pupils have.  The curriculum that leaders have put in place is very new. Leaders must ensure that all subject leaders are able to monitor the implementation of the curriculum in their subjects so they can support staff with the teaching of the curriculum.  Leaders have recently reviewed their approaches to behaviour. There are inconsistencies in the setting of expectations and application of the new approaches from staff. This means there are occasions of disruption in classes and during breaktimes and lunchtimes. Leaders must ensure there is a consistent approach to behaviour and expectations so that pupils know, understand and follow leaders’ expectations and behaviour incidents reduce.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school. Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.4

5

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.5

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Headteacher Julie Ingram (Executive Headteacher)

p.6

School details

Website www.allsaints-fordham.essex.sch.uk

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 18 March 2008

p.6

Information about this school

 Fordham All Saints is a voluntary controlled Church of England school. The most recent inspection of its religious character under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 was in March 2018, and it will receive its next inspection within eight years of that date.  There have been significant changes to staff and governors in recent years.  An improvement board was established by the local authority in February 2022 to support governors.  The executive headteacher leads another local school.  There is before- and after-school childcare for pupils attending the school. A separately registered and inspected childcare provider runs it.  School leaders do not currently make use of alternative provision.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.6

7

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.7

7

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, art and religious education. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The lead inspector also listened to a sample of pupils read to a familiar adult.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors scrutinised safeguarding policies, the school’s record of background checks of adults at the school, a local authority audit of safeguarding and a sample of child protection files. Inspectors also spoke with governors, a representative from the local authority, leaders, staff

p.7

7

and pupils about safeguarding practices at the school.  Inspectors held meetings with leaders, including the headteacher, the assistant headteacher, the SENCo, governors and a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors reviewed a range of documents, including behaviour logs, bullying records, attendance records, pupil records, minutes of governing body meetings, minutes of improvement board meetings, records of governor visits to the school, school improvement plans and school policies.  There were 45 responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, which were considered alongside 33 free-text responses. Inspectors also considered correspondence received from parents during the inspection.  There were 47 responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire. Inspectors also spoke with pupils throughout the inspection to gather their views.  There were 11 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. Inspectors also spoke

p.7

7

with staff throughout the inspection to gather their views.

p.7

Inspection team

Michael Williams, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Nicola Shadbolt Ofsted Inspector Primary School 29 and 30 November 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion