Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Farringdon Community Academy
Summary
Katie Spurr (lead), Garry Stout, Martin Featherstone, Matthew West
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Jan 2023
- Inspectors verified
Garry Stout, Katie Spurr, Martin Featherstone, Matthew West
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SR3 3EL
- Name on report verified
Farringdon Community Academy
- URN verified
139852
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There are a minority of pupils who do not behave as well as they should. p.2
- Pupils do not achieve as well as they should. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that there is clarity in systems and sufficient rigour in the evaluation of these. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that there are effective strategies in place to ensure that disadvantaged pupils achieve well and are engaged with the wider life of the school. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that all curriculum thinking is suitably ambitious and carefully organised. 10 and 11 January 2023 p.3
- Leaders should ensure that the behaviour policy is clear and consistently applied. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment11
“Leaders should ensure that teaching is of consistently high quality across the school.” p.4Records & policies5
“Additionally, some aspects of the behaviour policy lack clarity.” p.4Reading & phonics3
“Leaders have prioritised literacy.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,234
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Farringdon Community Academy Allendale Road, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear SR3 3EL
p.1
Inspection dates: 10 and 11 January 2023
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 10 and 11 January 2023
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy at Farringdon Community Academy. They feel safe and have adults in school that they trust. Pupils do not feel that bullying is an issue here. They confirm that they get clear messages about bullying from staff. They are confident that teachers would take any incidents of bullying seriously.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Most pupils behave well in lessons and around school. Generally, there are respectful relationships between pupils and staff. There are a minority of pupils who do not behave as well as they should. Sometimes lessons are disrupted by these pupils’ behaviour. Not all staff have the same high expectations for how pupils should behave. When pupils do not make the right choices, there are not clear systems in place to help them improve their behaviour.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The school is in a period of transition. There have been recent changes in leadership. New trust leadership now have an accurate view of the school’s priorities. They are raising expectations and challenging staff to do even better. Some school leaders are ambitious for what pupils can achieve and have high expectations of their conduct. They are keen to provide pupils with the best life chances. These high standards are not consistently shared across the school. Currently, the quality of education on offer at school is not good enough. Pupils do not achieve as well as they should.
p.2
better?
Leaders have designed a curriculum that is broad and ambitious at key stage 3 and well matched to pupils at key stage 4. For example, leaders introduced engineering as an option at key stage 4 to make sure that pupils are well prepared for the local job market. In some subjects, leaders have thought carefully about what pupils will learn. They have ensured that the content they will teach is ambitious and builds securely on what pupils will already know. They have organised their curriculum carefully. This is not the case in all subjects. In addition, some curriculum planning does not take into account what pupils have learned at key stage 2.
p.2
better?
Some teachers deliver the curriculum more effectively than others. In some lessons, teachers deliver content clearly. They check carefully what pupils understand through effective questioning. Recap and retrieval activities help pupils to remember what they have already learned. Some pupils are moving through the curriculum swiftly. This is not always the case. In some lessons, the activities that pupils complete are not well matched to what teachers want them to learn. Sometimes teachers are not checking pupils’ understanding before moving on.
p.2
better?
Teachers are well informed about how to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Teachers ensure that these pupils can access the curriculum alongside their peers. Pupils with a range of SEND benefit from an inclusive environment. Older pupils who attend the specially resourced provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder (specially resourced provision) are well 10 and 11 January 2023
p.2
3
prepared for taking their next steps through a specially designed curriculum. Pupils with SEND broadly achieve well. This is not the case for disadvantaged pupils. There is not a clear strategy in place for how these pupils are supported to achieve their potential.
p.3
3
Leaders have prioritised literacy. Pupils who find reading difficult are provided with regular support to help them catch up quickly. All pupils at key stage 3 have regular reading lessons to build their reading stamina. Leaders have considered how to build pupils’ vocabulary across subject areas.
p.3
3
Leaders have thought carefully about how to develop pupils beyond their academic subjects. Year 11 pupils appreciate the information and advice they are given about careers. All pupils learn about a range of topics that prepare them to be responsible citizens. They learn how to keep themselves safe, online and in the community. Pupils agree that school is a respectful environment. They do not feel that they would be victimised for being different. There is a wide range of extra-curricular opportunities on offer but many pupils do not take advantage of these. This is especially the case for disadvantaged pupils.
p.3
3
Over time, leaders have not effectively evaluated the impact of systems in place across the school. Some staff have previously raised workload and support from leadership as an issue. Trustees now have a clear vision for how to move the school forward. Staff feel proud to work at this school. They are optimistic about forthcoming changes.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils feel safe in school. They trust the adults in school to help them. Staff are clear about what signs would raise concerns about pupils’ well-being. They know how to report any concerns they have and do so regularly. Logs show that staff pay close attention to pupils’ well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders act on any concerns swiftly. They keep detailed records of all actions taken to keep pupils safe. They work with a range of external agencies to ensure that pupils and families get the support they need. Leaders are persistent in making sure that this support is received. Leaders are meticulous in ensuring that vulnerable pupils are carefully monitored.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
In some subject areas, the curriculum is not ambitious or precise enough about what pupils will learn. This means that pupils are not achieving well enough. Leaders should ensure that all curriculum thinking is suitably ambitious and carefully organised. 10 and 11 January 2023
p.3
4
There is variability in how effectively the curriculum is being delivered across the school. Some activities do not focus closely on what teachers want pupils to learn. Some teachers do not systematically check what pupils know and understand. This means that gaps in knowledge are sometimes not identified. Leaders should ensure that teaching is of consistently high quality across the school. Disadvantaged pupils do not achieve as well as their peers. Most of these pupils do not benefit from the wider enrichment opportunities that are in place in school. Leaders should ensure that there are effective strategies in place to ensure that disadvantaged pupils achieve well and are engaged with the wider life of the school. Some teachers do not have high enough expectations of pupils’ conduct. They do not apply the behaviour policy consistently. This leads to perceptions of unfairness from pupils. Additionally, some aspects of the behaviour policy lack clarity.
p.4
4
Leaders should ensure that the behaviour policy is clear and consistently applied. Some policies and systems in school are not clear or not precise enough, notably the behaviour policy and departmental monitoring systems. Leaders are not rigorously monitoring the impact of systems in place. This is having an impact on standards of behaviour and the quality of education. Leaders should ensure that there is clarity in systems and sufficient rigour in the evaluation of these.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 10 and 11 January 2023
p.4
School details
Principal Jordan Bedford (Interim Principal)
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 15 July 2021, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school has a specially resourced provision for pupils with autism spectrum disorder. Currently, 32 pupils attend this provision. The school uses three alternative provisions. One of these provisions is registered. Two of these provisions are unregistered. The school is in the early stages of moving to join Northern Education Trust. An interim leadership team have temporarily been placed in the school from Northern Education Trust.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the third routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors spoke with interim leaders and other members of the school leadership team, including leaders in charge of literacy, disadvantaged pupils and careers 10 and 11 January 2023
p.5
6
provision. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, modern foreign languages, history and science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with the special educational needs and/or disabilities coordinator. They looked at how pupils with SEND were supported in lessons. Inspectors looked at documentation that staff use to help them met these pupils’ needs. Inspectors met with leaders responsible for safeguarding. Inspectors checked logs of actions leaders take to keep pupils safe. An inspector checked the single central record and looked at documents related to safer recruitment. Inspectors spoke to a wide range of staff and pupils, formally and informally, during the inspection. They checked their understanding of safeguarding
p.6
6
procedures in school. Inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils in lessons and at social times. They spoke to pupils about behaviour in school. An inspector visited an unregistered alternative provision that is used by the school. They spoke with another unregistered alternative provision by phone. Inspectors scrutinised a range of data about behaviour and attendance. Inspectors met with leaders responsible for personal, social and health education. They checked the curriculum for what pupils learn in these lessons. Inspectors visited form time to see these sessions being delivered. An inspector met with the chair of the trust. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation, the school development plan, school improvement partner reports and minutes of trust board meetings. Inspectors considered the online responses to Ofsted’s pupil and staff surveys and
p.6
6
Ofsted’s parent survey, Ofsted Parent View.
p.6
Inspection team
Katie Spurr, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Matthew West Ofsted Inspector 10 and 11 January 2023
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion