Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Woodville Infant School
Summary
Shaheen Hussain (lead), Helen Williams, Moira Dales, Ryan Brown
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
30 Nov 2022
- Inspectors verified
Helen Williams, Moira Dales, Ryan Brown, Shaheen Hussain
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
DE11 7EA
- Name on report verified
Woodville Infant School
- URN verified
112655
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationInadequate
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Governors must ensure that leaders understand and fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities. p.4
- Leaders have not identified the key knowledge and skills that pupils, and children in the early years, must gain in all subjects and areas of learning. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that there is clarification as to what knowledge pupils should learn, and when, in all subjects across all years, including in the early years. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that the curriculum enables pupils to learn about people who are different to them, and the diverse nature of British society. p.4
- However, pupils’ understanding of different faiths and religions is not as well developed as it should be. p.3
- Leaders must ensure that all staff have the necessary knowledge of the school’s safeguarding systems and procedures to implement them well. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance29
“Leaders have not ensured that there are consistently high expectations for behaviour.” p.4Teaching & assessment5
“Teachers say that they feel well supported with their workload.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,444
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Woodville Infant School High Street, Woodville, Swadlincote, Derbyshire DE11 7EA
p.1
Inspection dates: 29 and 30 November 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
This school was last inspected 14 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 29 and 30 November 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have not ensured that all staff understand the school’s systems for keeping pupils safe. This potentially places pupils at risk.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Across a range of subjects, leaders have not identified the knowledge all pupils should learn to help them develop their understanding securely over time. Too many pupils do not develop quickly as fluent readers. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not receive a curriculum that meets their needs.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils know the school’s values. They like the rewards they receive for the positive choices they make. However, too many pupils do not behave well, particularly at lunchtimes. Poor behaviour in classrooms frequently disrupts learning. Pupils do not have an age-appropriate understanding of relationships and boundaries. Parents and carers worry about some pupils’ behaviour.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that they can talk to their friends and teachers about their worries. Most pupils say that they feel safe in school. They understand what bullying is. They know that adults will sort out any incidents. Some pupils visit the ‘caterpillar room’ to help them understand their emotions and feelings.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Children in the early years enjoy learning. They settle well into school life. Older pupils understand the importance of equality. They recognise that ‘anyone can do any job’.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not ensured that all pupils get off to a good start in their education. Leaders have acted too slowly to improve the school. They have not accurately identified the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, leaders’ actions are not having a swift, sustained impact on the quality of education for all pupils.
p.2
better?
Staff have received some training in the school’s early reading programme. Leaders have ensured that reading books match the sounds pupils know. However, staff do not adopt an effective, consistent approach to teaching reading. Some pupils do not have positive attitudes to reading. Disadvantaged pupils do not receive the support they need to help them to catch up.
p.2
better?
The mathematics curriculum is well structured. Teachers help pupils to learn from their mistakes. The rest of the school’s curriculum is not as well sequenced. Leaders have not identified what knowledge they want pupils to learn, and when, in most subjects. As a result, pupils’ knowledge and understanding of subjects are limited. Leaders do not have a clear view of how the curriculum should be improved.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum is suitably ambitious for pupils with SEND. These pupils do not receive well-planned support to access the curriculum. They do not develop well as independent learners. Some pupils with SEND have to 29 and 30 November 2022
p.2
3
wait too long to get support. As a result, they do not achieve as highly as they should.
p.3
3
Children in the early years show excitement and fascination in their learning. They told inspectors how they can grow an oak tree from a tiny seed. Some children relish making superhero costumes. Others confidently sing songs to their peers in the make-believe theatre. However, the early years curriculum is not well planned in all areas. Sometimes, adults do not teach or explain ideas precisely enough so that children can develop their understanding securely.
p.3
3
Some pupils are courteous and use their manners well. They learn to develop resilience in their learning. However, their learning is often disrupted by other pupils’ poor behaviour. Leaders have not ensured that all staff consistently apply the expectations for behaviour. Lunchtimes are often disorganised. A significant group of staff think that they do not receive enough support to manage pupils’ behaviour. Parents also expressed concerns about pupils’ behaviour. Communication and relationships between school leaders and parents are strained.
p.3
3
Leaders’ actions to improve attendance and punctuality are having some positive impact. However, there remains a significant group of vulnerable pupils who do not attend regularly.
p.3
3
Pupils like the reward systems in school. They understand that rules are needed in school and in wider society. Some pupils participate in sports competitions. However, pupils’ understanding of different faiths and religions is not as well developed as it should be.
p.3
3
Many governors are new to post. They have not yet received training for their roles. They recognise that there are significant challenges that the school faces and improvements that the leaders need to bring about. However, their work to date has yet to ensure that these improvements are happening.
p.3
3
Teachers say that they feel well supported with their workload. They appreciate leaders’ support for their well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders have not ensured that all staff understand the systems, policies and procedures to help keep pupils safe. Leaders have not established a consistent method for recording safeguarding concerns. Although leaders are aware of the local risks to pupils’ safety, they do not ensure that the most vulnerable pupils attend school regularly.
p.3
Safeguarding
Members of the new local governing body are evaluating the school safeguarding procedures, but this work is in its early stages. 29 and 30 November 2022
p.3
4
Pupils have some knowledge of how to stay safe online. They do not have an age- appropriate understanding of healthy relationships.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders have not established clear policies and procedures for safeguarding. There are too many systems in place for recording concerns. A significant group of staff are not well versed in the school’s procedures for safeguarding. This puts pupils at risk. Leaders must ensure that all staff have the necessary knowledge of the school’s safeguarding systems and procedures to implement them well. Governors must ensure that leaders understand and fulfil their safeguarding responsibilities. Staff do not implement the school’s early reading programme consistently and accurately. Pupils, particularly the most disadvantaged, do not learn to read well. Leaders must ensure that all staff have the knowledge and skills to be able to deliver the school’s phonics programme as intended, so that all pupils, including the most disadvantaged, are able to read fluently and confidently. Pupils with SEND do not always benefit from a high-quality education. These
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
pupils’ individual learning plans lack the necessary precision to help pupils to achieve their next steps. This slows down the learning and progress that pupils with SEND make. Leaders must ensure that there is a clear ambition in the curriculum for pupils with SEND. They must ensure that all staff have the knowledge and expertise to provide timely, well-matched support to meet the needs of all pupils with SEND. Leaders have not identified the key knowledge and skills that pupils, and children in the early years, must gain in all subjects and areas of learning. The curriculum does not prepare pupils well for the next stage of their education. Leaders must ensure that there is clarification as to what knowledge pupils should learn, and when, in all subjects across all years, including in the early years. Leaders have not ensured that there are consistently high expectations for behaviour. This means parts of the school day are disorderly, preventing pupils
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
from learning. Leaders must ensure that all staff understand the school’s approach to managing behaviour, so that there is a consistent approach to ensuring that pupils behave appropriately. Some pupils have a limited understanding of different groups in society. This does not prepare pupils well for life in and beyond the school. Leaders must ensure that the curriculum enables pupils to learn about people who are different to them, and the diverse nature of British society. Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection. 29 and 30 November 2022
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 29 and 30 November 2022
p.5
School details
Inspection number 10211888 Type of school Infant
p.6
School details
Website www.woodville-fed.derbyshire.sch.uk
p.6
School details
Date of previous inspection 14 and 15 January 2008, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school does not use any alternative provision. The infant school shares the same building as Woodville Junior School. The school’s leadership has oversight of both schools. There have been some significant, recent changes in the school’s governance. The executive headteacher took up post in January 2021.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. 29 and 30 November 2022
p.6
7
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and other leaders. Inspectors checked the school’s arrangements for safeguarding through discussions with leaders, staff and pupils. Inspectors scrutinised a range of safeguarding documents, including the school’s record of pre-employment checks. The lead inspector met with representatives of the school’s governing body. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, religious education, history and physical education. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders to discuss the curriculum, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of
p.7
7
pupils’ work. Pupils were also observed reading to a member of staff. Inspectors discussed the curriculum and reviewed samples of pupils’ work in some other subjects. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktime and lunchtime. Inspectors met with pupils and with staff, both formally and informally. A phone call was held between the lead inspector and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors reviewed the pupil, staff and parental responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire. Inspectors also spoke to parents at the start of the school day.
p.7
Inspection team
Shaheen Hussain, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Moira Dales Ofsted Inspector 29 and 30 November 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion