Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

The Oratory Roman Catholic Primary School

Inspected 1 Dec 2022 · published 15 Feb 2023 · URN 103427

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Helen Forrest (lead), Karen O’Keefe

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Dec 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Helen Forrest, Karen O’Keefe

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    B16 9ER

  • Name on report verified

    The Oratory Roman Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    103427

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivesafewell sequencedambitiouscleareffectivelyimprovedrespectful
Criticismtoo manynot alwayspoorgapsat riskconcernconcernsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1146w+12
  • Safeguarding103w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,214
shorter than usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 53
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of The Oratory Roman Catholic Primary School Oliver Road, Ladywood, Birmingham, West Midlands B16 9ER

p.1

Inspection dates: 30 November and 1 December 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Despite improvements in recent months, the overall quality of education at this school is poor. In some subjects, pupils learn the curriculum well. In mathematics, for example, staff have clear expectations and explain new information effectively. Pupils know and remember the important facts in this subject. However, the curriculum on offer to pupils is too narrow. Pupils do not have the chance to learn the full range of subjects in the national curriculum. Although leaders intend for this to happen, they have not yet thought carefully enough about what they expect pupils to learn.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and on the playground has improved significantly in recent months. Pupils know that they must be ‘ready, respectful and safe’. Most pupils rise to this expectation, and others are well supported when they find this difficult. In most lessons, pupils listen attentively and respond well to staff.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy to be at the school and feel safe. This is because they know that staff care about them and look after them well. Some pupils say that bullying can happen, but they have faith in the staff to sort out any problems. Leaders’ records support this view. Most issues, if they do occur, are disagreements over football.

p.2

better?

The school has faced significant challenges since the previous inspection. This is not solely related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Governors have had to manage these challenges, which have included recruiting a high proportion of new staff. However, they have not ensured that the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection have been addressed.

p.2

better?

New leaders have started to tackle the weaknesses in the curriculum. However, the curriculum currently in place is not broad and balanced. Too many subjects, including art and design, design technology, computing, music and modern foreign languages, are not taught. While planning shows when these subjects will be delivered, leaders have not decided on the content. In other subjects, such as history, leaders have identified the skills they want pupils to develop. However, they have not identified the knowledge they intend pupils to learn. This means that pupils do not build on their knowledge and understanding progressively. There is a similar issue with some areas of learning in early years. Leaders have identified what topics children will cover, but not the key knowledge that children will learn.

p.2

better?

Early reading and phonics are coherently sequenced. There are clear expectations for what pupils should know and by when. Staff teach daily phonics lessons in Reception and Year 1 following the agreed phonics programme. However, too many pupils do not keep up with the programme. Although staff use assessment strategies to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge, the extra support that pupils get to try and help them catch up is not always effective. As a result, these pupils do not read fluently or confidently. Too many children in early years are not ready for their next 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.2

3

stage of learning to read in Year 1. In key stage 2, pupils read more fluently and confidently. This is because the support they receive happens more frequently.

p.3

3

The curriculum in mathematics is well sequenced. In early years, it sets out clearly what children will learn. This builds progressively as pupils move through the school. Staff use models and images to support pupils’ understanding and recap on learning at the start of lessons to help them remember their learning. Staff use assessment strategies to identify gaps in pupils’ knowledge at the end of a term. This helps to inform what they need to revisit in future lessons. For most pupils, this helps them to learn the intended curriculum.

p.3

3

Leaders’ ambition is for all pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), to access the same curriculum. Leaders have ensured that there is more accurate identification of pupils’ needs. Many pupils with SEND are now starting to receive more effective support to access the curriculum. However, these improvements are at an early stage.

p.3

3

In most lessons, pupils learn without interruption. They work well collaboratively. Children in early years know how to share and take turns.

p.3

3

The personal, social, health and economic curriculum is well established. Events such as ‘healthy body and healthy mind week’ support pupils to understand the importance of being healthy. Pupils actively contribute to the life of the school through being a ‘prayer partner’ or being on the school council. Play leaders support younger pupils to stay active at playtimes. Pupils have a good understanding of fundamental British values, such as democracy and respect.

p.3

3

Staff feel that leaders are considerate of their workload and that their well-being is promoted.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders train all staff about safeguarding, and staff recognise the signs that a pupil might be at risk of harm. Staff report anything of concern through the systems agreed in school. Leaders make a written record of all concerns. Leaders take appropriate action when issues arise. This includes liaising with external agencies when required. These processes help to ensure that pupils are kept safe.

p.3

Safeguarding

Through the curriculum, pupils learn about staying safe when online and out in the community. Pupils know whom to talk to if they are worried about something. 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Staff do not provide several pupils at the early stages of reading with effective support to help them catch up quickly. As a result, these pupils cannot read with confidence and fluency. Leaders should ensure that the support given to these pupils is effective and enables them to learn to read.  The curriculum is narrow and does not cover the national curriculum. As a result, pupils do not experience a broad and balanced range of subjects. Leaders should urgently increase the curriculum offer so that pupils experience an appropriately sequenced and ambitious curriculum that meets the requirements of the national curriculum.  Some subject curriculums, including some areas of learning in early years, are not appropriately sequenced to build on pupils’ learning from one year to the next. As a result, pupils learn a disconnected series of facts and do not always learn what is most important. Leaders should urgently review the planned curriculum in

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

some subjects, including in early years, so that pupils’ learning builds logically over time.  Actions taken by leaders, including governors, have not addressed the weaknesses in the school’s curriculum. As a result, pupils do not receive an acceptable standard of education. Leaders, including governors, should take urgent action to improve the quality of education on offer at the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

Date of previous inspection

27 and 28 November 2018, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 This is a Catholic primary school.  The school’s most recent section 48 inspection for schools of a religious character took place in July 2019. Section 48 inspections were suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. They restarted in September 2021. The next inspection will be within eight years of the previous section 48 inspection.  The governing body manages a breakfast club for pupils who attend the school.  Leaders do not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.5

6

responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.6

6

 This was the first routine inspection the school had received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  The lead inspector reviewed documents on the school’s website, as well as published information about the school’s performance.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, the assistant headteacher, the SEND consultant, subject leaders and governors, including the chair of the governing body. They spoke to a representative of the local authority and of the diocese.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics, physical education and history. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors spoke to leaders about the curriculum in other subjects.

p.6

6

 The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead. Pupils’ case files were reviewed. The single central record of the checks on staff’s suitability to work with children was scrutinised.  Inspectors met with staff to discuss their workload and the support they receive to carry out their roles.  Inspectors spoke to pupils about how safe they feel in school and how they learn to keep themselves safe.  Inspectors spoke to parents and carers informally.  Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View, and the responses to the staff and pupil questionnaires.

p.6

Inspection team

Helen Forrest, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Karen O’Keefe Ofsted Inspector 30 November to 1 December 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion