Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

St. John's School (Seaford)

Inspected 1 Dec 2022 · published 14 Feb 2023 · URN SC050366

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Dec 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Matt Nicholls

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN25 2HU

  • Name on report verified

    St. John’s School (Seaford)

  • URN verified

    SC050366

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveimprovedindependenthappynurturingeffectiveenjoyproud
Criticismconcernsinadequate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1273w+43
  • What needs to improve29w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,301
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 1 St. John’s School (Seaford) Firle Road, Seaford, East Sussex BN25 2HU Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

St. John’s School (Seaford) is a non-maintained specialist school that works with children with complex learning disabilities, including some children who may have difficulties resulting from autism spectrum disorder and pathological demand avoidance syndrome.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

They provide education and care for up to 40 learners. Currently, 28 children attend the school. At the time of this inspection, there were two children who attend the residential provision for five days a week, and one child who attends two days a week. The residential provision can accommodate up to 16 children.

p.1

Information about this residential special school

This was a welfare only inspection and did not look at the quality of the education provision.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 22 February 2022

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Significant improvements have been made to the residential accommodation since the last inspection. This has resulted in children moving from the main school building accommodation to a newly refurbished house on the school grounds.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The house where children stay is beautifully presented, and adaptations have been made with the needs of the children in mind. For example, to reduce the stress of moving on one child leaders designed the extension to the new house and copied his living area in the main building. This highlights the thoughtful, child-focused approach promoted throughout the school.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

To improve the outdoor space for children, a new swing and gym equipment have been added, and staff completed a ‘colour run’ to raise funds for a new outdoor terrace for children to enjoy. Plans are in place to make a sensory planting area and a vegetable patch, which should be completed in the spring. Children are excited to use their new space, and eagerly await the warmer weather.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children attending the residential provision make significant progress in their independent living skills. Children, staff and parents were all keen to share stories of children improving their communication skills and their ability to access the community. One parent was particularly pleased that staff had helped her child to learn to ride a bike. Staff capture these achievements with certificates, which helps children to be proud of their achievements.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Residential staff work very closely with school staff to ensure that any issues that children may be experiencing that could impact on their school day are fully understood and that the support children need is in place.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children’s day-to-day experiences are positive. They share close relationships with staff, and staff speak fondly of the children. One child has improved their communication and social skills by going on excursions in the local community. This has resulted in them meeting new people and making friends.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Parents are positive about the care that their children receive. Parents of all children in the residential provision were unanimous in their praise of the care that their children receive. All parents gave examples of progress that their children had made in their independence skills and their ability to better manage their emotions at a pace that suits their needs.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

One parent said, ‘The staff have given me an opportunity to be a parent again and not a carer. I drop off a really happy child and pick up a really happy child each weekend.’ Staff are nurturing children’s talents by providing them with a range of opportunities to learn and develop. This parent went on to describe how their child is Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 3 now and able to speak to different people, which they were not doing before. She said, ‘[Child] is going to be the best version of themself because of residential.’

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Since the last inspection, significant improvements have been made to the structure of the school’s safeguarding team. The designated safeguarding lead (DSL) no longer has responsibility for the provider’s college, and is clearly focused on the school and residential services. Any safeguarding concerns are shared with the relevant safeguarding agencies, and prompt action is taken to safeguard children. The DSL leads weekly meetings with senior staff to review any emerging welfare or safeguarding concerns.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The safeguarding team has responded effectively to all complaints. One child in the residential provision has made two complaints this year. When asked, the child said that they were listened to. The DSL acted swiftly to resolve their concerns and ensured that they were fully informed throughout the process. This has allowed the child to trust that staff listen.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff have an in-depth knowledge of children’s needs and behaviours. There are detailed behaviour plans that are written by staff who know the children. The therapy team are involved in the creation and review of these plans and ensure that all aspects of the child’s needs are considered. Staff follow these plans in practice and ensure that they intervene early to help children to feel safe and ensure that their dignity is protected.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Children feel emotionally and physically safe. Children are supported by a therapy team, and this has led to children better understanding their emotions and learning coping skills to help them when they feel unsettled. As a result, there has only been one occasion when physical intervention has been required. This incident was clearly recorded, and the manager had good oversight of this incident.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff understand the vulnerabilities of individual children and how to safeguard children, and they attend regular safeguarding training sessions.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The shortfalls identified at the last inspection regarding fire safety have been addressed.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders have been quick to respond to shortfalls identified at the last inspection. They have commissioned an independent audit of the care provided in the residential provision and have acted on this to implement a wide range of improvements. As a result, the residential provision has been extensively refurbished. The manager’s oversight of safeguarding practice has improved. Leaders have taken prompt action to manage staff performance in order to improve the quality of care and Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 4 safeguarding practice. This has resulted in a meaningful change to children’s experiences, which has had a positive impact on their progress.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

An independent visitor spends time in the residential provision each term. He speaks to children and staff, and provides reports on the quality of care provided to children and children’s experiences of care. Leaders and managers make good use of the independent visitor’s feedback to improve practice.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The governor who has lead responsibility for residential care has good oversight of care practice. She visits the provision, speaks to children, and has regular meetings with the residential team. She also provides scrutiny of safeguarding concerns and works closely with leaders to ensure that children receive good quality care.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Leaders promote a positive, collaborative culture. Staff, including night staff, speak highly about the support that they receive from leaders. Staff describe themselves as a ‘family’, and say that these close relationships help them to provide consistent, nurturing care to children. Children have better managed changes to their residential accommodation because of the care and dedication of staff.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

New staff are subject to checks and scrutiny to ensure that they are suitable for their role. The school’s human resources team is well informed of key legislation with regards to safe recruitment. However, on one occasion, a staff member’s full work history had not been fully explored, despite all other checks being completed.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff speak highly of the training that they receive. Bespoke training regarding managing difficult conversations with parents has been well received, and communication between staff and parents has improved. The headteacher has also introduced ‘Earwig’, a communication tool, to enable parents to see pictures of their children learning and achieving while at school. This helps parents to stay connected and involved in their children’s lives while they are away from home. Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 5

p.4

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that all staff have a full work history when employed to work in the residential team at the school. (Linked to NMS 24.1)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC050366

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Anthony Carlo

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential Special School

p.6

Residential special school details

Email address: reception.sch@st-johns.co.uk

p.6

Inspector

Matt Nicholls, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential special school - St. John’s School (Seaford) 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion