Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St John Fisher Catholic Academy
Summary
Graham Findlay (lead), Bernard Clark, Dan Whieldon, Gordon Watts, Katie North, Matthew West
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2022
- Inspectors verified
Bernard Clark, Dan Whieldon, Gordon Watts, Graham Findlay, Katie North, Matthew West
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HG2 8PT
- Name on report verified
St John Fisher Catholic Academy
- URN verified
148855
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance17
“Sometimes leaders are slow to respond to parents who raise concerns.” p.3Parents & families10
“Sometimes leaders are slow to respond to parents who raise concerns.” p.3Progress & outcomes6
“Leaders have high expectations of what pupils can achieve.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,181
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of St John Fisher Catholic Academy Hookstone Drive, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG2 8PT
p.1
Inspection dates: 13 and 14 December 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Sixth-form provision Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected St John Fisher Catholic Academy as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils value the education that they receive at St John Fisher Catholic Academy. Leaders have high expectations of what pupils can achieve. They have designed a curriculum which achieves the school’s mission, ‘educating for life’. Pupils leave the school well equipped for their next step in education, employment or training.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave considerately and maturely. They wear their uniforms with pride. Their achievements are celebrated in rewards assemblies. However, a minority of pupils think that leaders do not celebrate positive behaviour as much as they could.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders respond when pupils raise concerns. For example, leaders have improved indoor and outside areas of the school where some pupils felt uncomfortable in the past. This has helped pupils to feel safe in school. Pupils appreciate the support of pastoral staff. When pupils report bullying, staff tackle it directly.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
A rich set of extra-curricular opportunities are available for pupils. Sixth-form students lead by example. Members of the school congress are proud of their leadership responsibilities. Sixth-form students willingly support lower school pupils. For example, some read with younger pupils while others help out at the ‘space club’.
p.2
better?
Careful thought has gone into the curriculum design. Pupils benefit from lessons that build upon what they already know. Teachers frequently check pupils’ understanding and help them to remember important concepts. Pupils use their prior knowledge to perform increasingly complex tasks in subsequent lessons. They talk confidently about their learning over time. Although the curriculum is ambitious, leaders are making changes to the curriculum so that pupils in Years 7 to 9 can study topics, such as the Holocaust in history, in even greater depth. Senior leaders are working with curriculum subject leaders to introduce a new and even richer key stage 3 curriculum from September 2023.
p.2
better?
Recent staff training has increased teachers’ understanding of special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). In some subjects, such as physical education (PE), teachers skilfully support pupils with physical disabilities. However, not all pupils’ needs are consistently catered for with the same level of expertise. For example, some pupils with dyslexia feel well supported by some teachers more than others. When pupils with SEND ask for help, sometimes teachers do not know how to support them fully. This is partially because leaders do not fully provide teachers with precise enough information about individual pupils.
p.2
better?
There is an effective programme to deliver reading support to those pupils who need it. Pupils with reading difficulties are identified swiftly. Well-delivered reading sessions build pupils’ reading competence and confidence over time. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.2
3
The sixth form has a broad curriculum offer, as well as a wide range of extra- curricular opportunities. Teachers have secure academic and vocational subject knowledge. Students are consistently positive about their experience in the sixth form. They value the pastoral and academic support given to them. All students progress to suitably ambitious destinations.
p.3
3
Pupils behave with maturity and are tolerant of one another. The new behaviour and engagement policy has raised standards in pupils’ behaviour. Although positive behaviour is celebrated, some older pupils feel that the messages given to them by adults about behaviour expectations are too negative.
p.3
3
A wide range of rich activities are available to help pupils develop their individual character. Regular opportunities to debate important ethical issues help pupils to develop their moral compass. An exciting range of extra-curricular clubs and activities are on offer. Information to help pupils to decide their next steps is improving. The strength of the careers offer in the sixth form is now being realised across the school.
p.3
3
New leaders have brought stability to the school. They are ambitious and have rightly raised expectations of pupils and of staff. Most parents and carers would recommend the school. However, a small but significant minority of parents do not feel that communication between school and home is effective. Previous instability in leadership has not helped. Sometimes leaders are slow to respond to parents who raise concerns. Over time, some parents of pupils with SEND have not been involved sufficiently in their children’s education. Some parents recognise recent improvements in communication. However, more is needed to include the whole community fully in the school’s improvement journey.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders keep a keen eye on safeguarding arrangements. They analyse safeguarding data and spot any emerging trends. This work informs what training to give staff so that they have an up-to-date awareness of contextual safeguarding issues. When concerns arise about pupils, swift action is taken to support those who need help. Governors closely scrutinise this work.
p.3
Safeguarding
There are regular conversations with pupils about how they can be aware of risks to their safety. Regular visits from outside agencies, such as the police, help pupils to understand what risks they might face in the community. Most pupils appreciate the efforts that leaders go to when supporting them with any mental health issues. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some teachers do not provide pupils with SEND with effective support in lessons. Some of the information that senior leaders provide to teachers about pupils’ individual needs is not clear or specific. As a result, pupils with SEND do not achieve as well as they could. Leaders should ensure that staff are given precise information about the needs of pupils with SEND so that all pupils achieve the best possible outcomes. A small but significant minority of parents do not feel that communication between school and home is effective. Sometimes, when parents raise concerns or pass on their views, the response from staff is slow. As a result, some parents, including those of pupils with SEND, are not informed sufficiently about their children’s education and their experiences in school. Leaders must engage more purposefully with these parents and involve them more effectively in school life.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10240503 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,405
p.5
sixth form
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school converted to become an academy in December 2021 and joined the Bishop Wheeler Catholic Academy Trust. When its predecessor school, St John Fisher Catholic High School, was last inspected by Ofsted in October 2006, it was judged to be outstanding overall. The current headteacher joined the predecessor school in September 2020. The school is designated as having a religious character and is a voluntary aided school. The predecessor school’s most recent section 48 inspection was in June 2018. The school uses two unregistered alternative provisions for a very small number of pupils. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders throughout the inspection. This included meetings with the deputy headteachers, the director of sixth form and assistant headteachers. Inspectors also met with the chief executive officer of the trust and other trust employees. The lead inspector also met with members of the school’s academy council, including the chairperson and vice chairperson, and held a telephone conversation with the chairperson of the trustees. Inspectors carried out deep dives in the following subjects: English, mathematics, modern foreign languages, science and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke
p.6
Information about this inspection
to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with other curriculum leaders, reviewed curriculum planning and visited lessons in other curriculum subjects to look at how teachers support pupils with SEND. Inspectors also reviewed a range of SEND documentation and met with pupils with SEND to discuss the quality of the support that they receive. An inspector met with the school’s reading lead and visited some reading intervention groups. To inspect safeguarding, the lead inspector met the designated safeguarding lead (DSL), the deputy DSL and the headteacher. They reviewed safeguarding documentation, including referrals to external agencies. Inspectors also spoke with staff and pupils throughout the inspection about their safeguarding knowledge. An inspector visited one unregistered provider used by the school and spoke to pupils attending the provision.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with leaders responsible for aspects of the school’s personal development programme, visited a personal, social and health education lesson and visited registration at the start of the day. Inspectors spoke with pupils throughout the inspection, formally and informally. They also observed break and lunchtime arrangements and reviewed a wide range of school documentation. The views of staff, pupils and parents submitted through Ofsted’s surveys were considered along with free-text responses. An inspector also spoke with one parent via the telephone. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.6
Inspection team
Graham Findlay, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Dan Whieldon Ofsted Inspector 13 and 14 December 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or ema.
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion