Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Feb 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Hawkes (lead), Dave Gilkerson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dave Gilkerson, Heather Hawkes

  • Postcode verified

    PE23 5EJ

  • Name on report verified

    Woodlands Academy This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongaccuratecleareffectivelyconfidentfeel safepositive
Criticisminadequatenot yetlackconcernconcernsnot alwaysdelayednot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings204w−60
  • What needs to improve850w−13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,053
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 19%What needs to improve 81%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Carl Smith Headteacher Woodlands Academy Partney Road Spilsby Lincolnshire PE23 5EJ

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Woodlands Academy

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 13 and 14 December 2022 on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in November 2021.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Woodlands Academy

During the inspection, Heather Hawkes, Ofsted Inspector (OI), and I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the chair of trustees, and the chair of the local governing board, the actions that leaders have taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also visited lessons, met with staff and pupils, discussed the curriculum with leaders, looked at samples of pupils’ work and scrutinised a range of different documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Woodlands Academy

Woodlands Academy remains inadequate and requires special measures.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the category of concern to be removed.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

I am of the opinion that the school may appoint early career teachers.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 ensure that all staff have the knowledge and skills they need to help pupils quickly become accurate and fluent readers.

p.1

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Since the last monitoring inspection, leaders have had a particular focus on ‘stage three’ of the school’s action plan. This stage of the plan has a sharper focus on the quality of education provided to pupils. Therefore, this monitoring inspection focused mainly on this aspect of the school’s provision.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

It is clear to see the progress that you and your leaders have made in some of the areas highlighted during the previous inspection. For example, they have focused on ensuring education, health and care (EHC) plans are updated and regularly reviewed. The training that leaders have provided has enabled staff to produce clear targets for pupils that relate to their emotional and behavioural needs. Parents and carers appreciate that leaders have shared these targets with them. However, leaders have not yet ensured that teachers receive detailed information about pupils’ additional learning needs. This has led to some teachers providing work for pupils that is either too easy or too difficult.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have worked effectively with teachers to review curriculum plans for subjects. This has led to some subject choices at key stage 4 being changed to widen opportunities for pupils. The motor vehicle qualification has now been changed to engineering to encompass a broader range of knowledge and skills. Leaders have developed some curriculum areas more than others. For example, mathematics has been logically sequenced to ensure that pupils learn key concepts at the right time and at the right level. However, leaders’ ambitions for science have not been realised. The curriculum in this subject has not been thought about carefully enough to ensure that it meets the needs of all pupils. Learning has not been broken down into smaller steps where the important knowledge and skills are clearly identified. As a result, there is a ‘one size fits all’ approach taken in science which leaves many pupils unable to remember the

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

important knowledge they need. Leaders have not yet made sure that teachers know exactly what to teach, and when, in all subject areas.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have raised the profile of reading particularly in Year 7, where pupils have daily reading sessions after lunch. They have also undertaken further assessments of pupils’ reading ability. This has highlighted a significant number of pupils who are not yet confident readers. Leaders are aware that this situation means more needs to be done to prioritise reading. The current weekly intervention is not regular enough to have the impact on pupils’ reading that leaders desire. While there have been some improvements in the reading ability of some pupils, the lack of an age-appropriate phonics-based scheme and trained staff have slowed the progress that could have been made for all pupils.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Senior leaders from the multi-academy trust are determined to remove any barriers that may hinder the continued improvement of the school. Trust and senior staff expertise has helped to develop useful training and support for school staff. Many staff told us that this training has been effective in helping them improve their practice. Some of the planned support for staff has not been provided, due to illness and the lack of capacity to release teachers to work with other staff in different schools. This has delayed some of the curriculum development work that is required in subjects.

p.2

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders have continued to ensure that their safeguarding practices are effective. The strong culture of safeguarding has meant that pupils were confident to tell us that they feel safe at school. Your staff use their training and knowledge of individual pupils to identify any potential concerns quickly. Leaders have also further developed their behaviour and attendance reporting. This has allowed them to celebrate pupils’ achievements in improving their attendance or sustaining good attendance. Leaders also reward pupils when they demonstrate the positive behaviours that underpin the agreed ethos of the school.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

Leaders from the multi-academy trust have used external support and expertise to provide them with an objective ‘health check’ on the school. This has provided useful information that has helped shape the type of support they will provide to the school. However, the trust’s monitoring of the school’s action plan is not as effective as it could be. This is due to some success criteria in the action plan not being precise enough. Leaders from the trust do not use clear success criteria when reviewing progress. Therefore, those responsible for the governance of the school do not always have the most accurate view of the progress leaders have made towards the outcomes stated in the action plan.

p.3

The progress made towards the removal of special measures

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, and the chief executive officer of the Community Inclusive Trust multi-academy trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion