Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gwendoline Onyon (lead), Bianka Zemke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bianka Zemke, Gwendoline Onyon

  • Postcode verified

    HR4 0RN

  • Name on report verified

    Whitecross Hereford This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh expectationsstrongsaferobustaccuratelyknowledgeablepositive
Criticismweaknessesseriouslacksnot alwaysconcernnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
843
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Timothy Knapp Headteacher Whitecross Hereford Three Elms Road Hereford Herefordshire HR4 0RN

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Whitecross Hereford

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 13 and 14 December 2022, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2022.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Whitecross Hereford

During the inspection, Gwendoline Onyon, Ofsted Inspector (OI), Huw Bishop, OI, Geoff Renwick, OI, and I discussed with you, other senior leaders, governors/trustees and other staff the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also carried out visits to lessons, held meetings with teachers, pupils and support staff and scrutinised safeguarding documents. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

designation:

You, together with leaders, staff and governors have acted swiftly to address the issues highlighted since the last inspection. The weaknesses identified were related to safeguarding and those responsible for governance effectively fulfilling their delegated duties in relation to creating a strong culture of safeguarding at your school. The improvement and action plans you have drawn up, following the previous inspection, are fit for purpose. You have sought external support and checking of the school’s safeguarding processes and procedures to make sure they meet statutory requirements. You have acted with urgency to address and implement all suggested strategies. During discussions with me, you and your colleagues have expressed your high expectations of everyone in creating a secure and robust culture of safeguarding.

p.1

designation:

You have now completed all relevant and necessary pre-employment checks on all staff and governors at the school. You have made sure that all files are up to date and include the appropriate checks. The single central record has been updated to include these checks. However, the single central record lacks some detail. While all checks are accurately recorded in staff’s personnel files, the single central record does not always reflect this same level of detail. In order to further strengthen the single central record, you should ensure that all checks and who performed them are accurately reflected on the single central record.

p.2

designation:

You have recruited several new governors. The new link governor for safeguarding has the relevant expertise to offer appropriate challenge to you and your colleagues on safeguarding practices. For example, the new link governor has made suggestions on how safeguarding practices can be optimised. Those responsible for governance now have a much sharper and clearer oversight of the practices in school. Some very new governors would benefit from further training to ensure they fully understand their roles and responsibilities.

p.2

designation:

Staff who are employed at the school receive regular and detailed training about safeguarding processes and procedures. This includes regular topical updates. Your staff are knowledgeable about contextual issues within the local community and the wider Herefordshire area, for example. However, agency staff do not yet receive this same training. While they have a basic understanding of safeguarding from their employers, they have not got the sharp insight that your staff do. You have recognised this, and full training is planned for all staff at the start of the new term.

p.2

designation:

Staff know what procedures to follow if they are worried about a pupil. The safeguarding team effectively records and investigates every concern they are alerted to. Leaders work well with external agencies to ensure that children and families receive the support they need. Staff know the pupils and families well. Staff regularly use the positive relationships they have with pupils to ensure they are cared for and nurtured. For example, staff in the kitchen give extra food to pupils who they know face financial difficulties.

p.2

designation:

During this visit you explained that there is now a new electronic system in place for all staff and visitors to sign in and record their attendance at school. While most staff regularly use this system, some do not. You should now ensure that all staff consistently use the new system in place.

p.2

designation:

Pupils are confident that there is a trusted adult in school who they could turn to if they were ever worried about anything. They speak about feeling safe and demonstrate secure knowledge about how to keep themselves safe in everyday situations. For example, they spoke to us about online safety, dangers from criminal exploitation and healthy relationships. Pupils told us that staff care for them and make sure they are safe.

p.2

designation:

While effective processes and procedures have been introduced to strengthen safeguarding practices, more needs to be done to fully embed these across the school.

p.3

designation:

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Hereford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion