Cirencester Kingshill School

Inspection of Cirencester Kingshill School Kingshill Lane, Cirencester, Gloucestershire GL7 1HS

p.1

Inspection dates: 22 and 23 November 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 22 and 23 November 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

While pupils typically behave well, leaders’ expectations of pupils’ behaviour and attitudes are too variable. Leaders also do not have high enough expectations of what all pupils can achieve in their learning. As a result, some pupils do not have consistently positive attitudes to learning.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Relationships between pupils and staff are generally warm and respectful. When bullying occurs, most pupils and parents are confident that staff will resolve it. Most parents say that their child is happy and safe. Pupils say that they are encouraged to respect people from other backgrounds and to treat everyone equally. However, a small minority of pupils do not demonstrate enough respect for other pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils develop an understanding of democracy through voting opportunities. For example, they vote on which charities will receive the funds they have raised. Pupils benefit from a range of extra-curricular opportunities. These include sport and drama. Some pupils are part of the school’s sports leadership academy. They help to run sports and physical education (PE) events for primary-age pupils.

p.2

better?

Leaders and trustees do not have a clear enough vision for a high-quality education. Leaders do not provide sufficient information to trustees so that they can ask well- informed questions and challenge robustly. As a result, the quality of education has not improved enough.

p.2

better?

Leaders have not made sufficient improvements to the curriculum for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders do not identify pupils’ needs well enough. This means that teaching does not support pupils to follow the curriculum successfully. Leaders are taking steps to improve the support provided for pupils with SEND, but the full impact of this is yet to be realised.

p.2

better?

At key stage 4, many pupils choose to study the suite of subjects known as the English Baccalaureate (EBacc). Almost all pupils choose history or geography, for example. Increasing numbers of pupils choose a modern foreign language. However, in key stage 3, a small minority of pupils do not follow a curriculum that is broad and ambitious enough.

p.2

better?

Where the curriculum is strong, it is well planned and sequenced. Teachers have subject expertise and present information clearly. In other subjects, the curriculum is not strong enough or taught as intended. This includes the curriculum for pupils in the early stages of learning to read. The weaknesses in the early reading curriculum mean that some pupils do not gain a strong enough foundation for future learning. 22 and 23 November 2022

p.2

3

Where assessment is used well, it helps pupils to remember and use their knowledge readily. However, the use of assessment is less well embedded in some subjects. This means that pupils do not improve their knowledge and skills well enough.

p.3

3

Leaders have devised a personal, social and health education curriculum that is designed to develop pupils’ understanding of healthy relationships. This includes raising pupils’ awareness of protected characteristics. However, the personal development curriculum is not consistently put into place as intended. Consequently, support for pupils’ personal development is not strong enough.

p.3

3

There is an effective careers education, information, advice and guidance programme. Pupils are confident about making their choices about post-16 education, employment or training. Pupils take part in meaningful work experience.

p.3

3

Leaders have designed a professional development programme to support teachers to refine their practice. However, the programme has not had a consistent impact on improving the quality of education that pupils receive. Leaders have put strategies in place to manage staff workload and well-being. Nonetheless, some staff feel that leaders could do more to manage their workload and improve pupils’ behaviour.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make timely referrals to safeguarding partners and collaborate effectively with external partners. This protects pupils. When leaders consider external support to be insufficient, they escalate their concerns.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are aware of local contextual safeguarding issues. There are appropriate policies and practice to tackle sexual abuse and harassment in and out of school.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders provide effective safeguarding training for staff. As a result, staff know how to identify and report concerns. Leaders ensure adults working in the school are suitable and have had appropriate checks.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Trustees and leaders do not have a clear enough vision for the quality of education. Trustees do not challenge leaders stringently enough. Leaders should ensure that trustees have the information they need to provide greater challenge so that pupils receive a good quality of education.  Some aspects of the curriculum are not well planned and implemented. As a result, some pupils do not gain sufficient knowledge in some subjects. Leaders 22 and 23 November 2022

p.3

4

should ensure that all subject curriculums are well designed and put into place as intended.  Leaders do not identify the needs of pupils with SEND well enough. Therefore, the curriculum is not adapted so that pupils with SEND can follow the curriculum successfully. Leaders should ensure that the needs of all pupils with SEND are identified and met.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

You can use to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school, or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 22 and 23 November 2022

p.4

School details

Inspection number 10228011 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.5

School details

Website www.cirencesterkingshill.gloucs.sch.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 1 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The number of pupils with SEND is above average.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.  The school does not use alternative provision.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, members of the senior leadership team, curriculum leaders and members of the board of trustees. 22 and 23 November 2022

p.5

6

 Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, geography, food technology and PE. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, looked at curriculum planning, visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  To evaluate the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors scrutinised the single central record of adults working in the school. The lead inspector met with the designated safeguarding lead and examined the school’s safeguarding records. Inspectors also spoke with a range of pupils and staff about safeguarding.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including free-text comments. Inspectors also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey and to Ofsted’s online pupil survey.

p.6

Inspection team

James Oldham, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Julia Chapman Ofsted Inspector 22 and 23 November 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7