Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Ridgewood School
Summary
James Duncan (lead), Manina Tyler-Mort, Steve Willacy, Stuart Voyce, Thomas Wraith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2022
- Inspectors verified
James Duncan, Manina Tyler-Mort, Steve Willacy, Stuart Voyce, Thomas Wraith
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DN5 7UB
- Name on report verified
Ridgewood School
- URN verified
137603
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders should ensure that all pupils who need help to read are provided with appropriate support. p.4
- Leaders should quality assure the PSHE curriculum more regularly, ensuring they better understand what pupils can recall from this subject. p.4
- The oversight they have of the school is less comprehensive than it should be. p.4
- Trustees should review their fulfilment of essential governance duties, ensuring they are doing all they can to support and challenge leaders with their school p.4
- Leaders also survey pupils on a regular basis to help understand what is going well and what needs to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance35
“It also helps leaders to understand where pupils are thriving academically.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,351
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Ridgewood School Barnsley Road, Scawsby, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN5 7UB
p.1
Inspection dates: 13 and 14 December 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Sixth-form provision Good Leadership and management Good Previous inspection grade Requires improvement 13 and 14 December 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils attending Ridgewood School benefit from a good quality of education. Pupils behave well and have positive attitudes towards school. They attend regularly. Staff and leaders manage pupils’ behaviour well. This is particularly impressive given the cumbersome nature of the school site and the use of many standalone school buildings.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are well prepared for life after school. Their destinations are appropriate and ambitious. The support available for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) has improved. However, there remains more to do to ensure pupils who struggle to read fluently benefit from consistent support at the school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
A wide range of extra-curricular clubs are available. Leaders track attendance at these to help increase the number of pupils who benefit from these opportunities. Leaders also survey pupils on a regular basis to help understand what is going well and what needs to improve. Appropriate support is offered when pupils raise concerns linked to bullying and/or feeling safe at school. This is important as some pupils report hearing unkind comments more often than they would like to.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
There have been several recent changes to the board of trustees at this standalone academy. Trustees are aware they have more to do to monitor the school’s progress.
p.2
better?
Leaders have improved the curriculum at the school. All pupils access an ambitious curriculum, including pupils with SEND and those identified as disadvantaged. The range of subjects available to those attending alternative provision has also broadened since the start of the school year.
p.2
better?
Leaders have made changes to the time pupils have to study their subjects. For example, pupils now have more science lessons than they did previously. This allows them to cover the curriculum in greater depth. Pupils have responded well to this change. In Year 10, most pupils now study separate sciences. Recognising that the uptake of modern foreign languages in key stage 4 was low, leaders have appointed additional staff and introduced an optional after-school GCSE German course. They have also introduced a new languages course in the sixth form. These changes to the curriculum have been well received by the school community.
p.2
better?
Pupils’ academic experiences in many subjects are positive. The areas identified as needing to improve at the previous inspection in 2019 have been rightly prioritised. The mathematics curriculum, for example, is much improved. Pupils are well taught in mathematics by teachers who use detailed lesson plans. Assessment is embedded throughout lessons, and pupils can remember more of what they have been taught. Their results in public mathematics examinations are also much improved. Leaders are currently adapting the provision in mathematics for the weakest pupils to ensure they too remember more of what they have been taught. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.2
3
Leaders are aware of which subjects are more established and which currently require support. For example, leaders have recently prioritised support for the English department. They are modifying the curriculum to help improve the quality of pupils’ written work. Leaders have also introduced separate support to help pupils who are not fluent readers. However, this support is in its early stages of development. Not all pupils identified as needing this help are currently receiving it.
p.3
3
The sixth form is popular. It is well led. An ever-diverse range of subjects are on offer for students. Several sixth-form lessons were visited during the inspection. In all cases, students were benefiting from teachers who were subject experts. Students are exceptionally positive about their experiences in the sixth form. They enjoy the school’s wider enrichment opportunities, which include sporting, academic and other activities. Students receive appropriate pastoral care and careers guidance.
p.3
3
Leaders regularly seek the views of pupils. This helps to identify concerns that pupils may have. It also helps leaders to understand where pupils are thriving academically. However, staff have not extensively gathered pupils’ views on their personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education lessons. Addressing this is important, because although the PSHE curriculum is well mapped out, many pupils told inspectors that it was their least favourite lesson. Some pupils had gaps in what they could remember from their PSHE lessons.
p.3
3
Pupils with SEND are well catered for. Pupils’ individual needs are identified by leaders of SEND and then shared with staff. Teachers use this information when planning lessons. Leaders of SEND have begun to quality assure teachers’ use of these plans, to check that pupils’ needs are consistently met throughout school. Leaders have plans to make these checks on a more regular basis. The needs of pupils with SEND are recognised in other ways too. For example, in addition to the school’s well-managed seclusion room, a separate space is available for pupils with SEND. This allows the more vulnerable pupils to reflect on any incidents of poor behaviour in a safe and appropriate environment.
p.3
3
There have been several changes to the personnel on the board of trustees. The board is currently co-chaired by two trustees who began their roles in summer 2022. The co-chairs understand the improvements needed at board level. This is important as the board members are not currently doing all that they can to support leaders and are not holding leaders fully to account for the quality of education offered at the school. For example, they do not routinely challenge leaders on their use of the pupil premium. Their oversight of pupils at alternative provision is also unclear. They, and other school leaders, are mindful of staff workload.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.3
4
Leaders have an appropriate understanding of safeguarding. As a result, there is an effective culture of safeguarding throughout the school. Leaders keep detailed records when concerns about pupils arise. They work with external agencies, in addition to offering in-school support, to help keep pupils safe.
p.4
4
Leaders are mindful of topical safeguarding matters and take these into account when planning the PSHE curriculum. For example, following the recent national commentary about tackling inappropriate sexual behaviours, leaders have launched their own ‘10 things to remember’ campaign. This has been well received by pupils.
p.4
4
Leaders make necessary checks when appointing new staff. They are currently tightening whistle-blowing arrangements to ensure staff are fully aware of how to raise concerns about other adults in school.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Some pupils, who leaders have identified as needing help to read fluently, are not receiving appropriate support. This limits their ability to access the curriculum fully. Leaders should ensure that all pupils who need help to read are provided with appropriate support. Leaders do not routinely check that the PSHE curriculum is being well received by pupils. This limits the impact of what is otherwise a well-planned curriculum. Leaders should quality assure the PSHE curriculum more regularly, ensuring they better understand what pupils can recall from this subject. Trustees do not hold leaders to account thoroughly enough. Furthermore, they do not keep comprehensive records of the work they do to support the school. The oversight they have of the school is less comprehensive than it should be. Trustees should review their fulfilment of essential governance duties, ensuring they are doing all they can to support and challenge leaders with their school
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.4
5
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.5
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,400
p.6
sixth form
Chair of trust Berbet Esmilda Lynds and Andrea Louise Brayford-Ryder (acting co-chairs) Principal Andrew Peirson
p.6
sixth form
Website http://www.ridgewoodschool.co.uk
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 12 and 13 March 2019, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school is the only school within the single-academy trust known legally as ‘The Academy @ Ridgewood Trust’. The school is currently considering joining a larger multi-academy trust. The school uses eight alternative providers of education. Two of these are registered providers and subject to inspection by Ofsted. The other six are unregistered providers. Through its careers programme, the school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 13 and 14 December 2022
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors met with the principal and most members of the school’s senior leadership team. A discussion was held with three representatives from the board of trustees, including the acting co-chairs and the vice-chair. To evaluate the quality of education, deep dives were carried out in mathematics, science, design technology, geography and history. These involved meeting subject leaders, reviewing curriculum plans, visiting lessons, speaking to teachers, talking to pupils about their learning and looking at samples of their work. The school’s PSHE curriculum was also reviewed. Inspectors reviewed the provision for pupils with SEND, in addition to the school’s strategy to support
p.7
Information about this inspection
pupils to read. As part of the evaluation of the effectiveness of safeguarding, the school’s safeguarding policies and procedures and other records were reviewed. The checks made when appointing new staff were scrutinised. An inspector visited three of the unregistered alternative providers of education used by the school. The inspector spoke by telephone to several of the other settings. The views of parents and carers, staff and pupils who responded to Ofsted’s surveys were also fully considered.
p.7
Inspection team
James Duncan, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
Thomas Wraith His Majesty’s Inspector 13 and 14 December 2022
p.7
8
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
8
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
8
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
8
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
8
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion