Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Holywell Primary and Nursery School

Inspected — · published 6 Feb 2023 · URN 132060

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Simpson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Simpson

  • Postcode verified

    B45 9EY

  • Name on report verified

    Holywell Primary and Nursery School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualitysuccessfullyconsistentlyclearpositiveeffectivelyrobust
Criticismlackrequires improvementunclearlowernot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings884w+27
  • What needs to improve65w+36

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
947
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 93%What needs to improve 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Christian Hamilton Headteacher Holywell Primary and Nursery School School Road Rubery Rednal Birmingham West Midlands B45 9EY

p.1

School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 14 December 2022 on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

School

During the inspection, I discussed with you, other senior leaders, two governors and a representative of the local authority, the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. I also reviewed curriculum documents and met with subject leaders for reading, art, geography and religious education. I carried out lesson visits, observed pupils reading to a staff member, and spoke to pupils about their work. I also examined the school’s own self-evaluation and development plan, and checked the school’s single central record. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

school to become good. The school should take further action to:

p.1

made progress to improve the school, but more work is necessary for the

 Further develop the role of subject leaders so that they can critically evaluate how well the curriculum is implemented and identify where further support and improvements are needed.  Review assessment systems to ensure that staff have a clear understanding of how well pupils achieve across the curriculum and retain information long term.

p.2

Main findings

There have been no significant changes to staffing or school context since the previous inspection.

p.2

Main findings

You and your staff have been proactive in addressing the issues raised in the last inspection. You have thought judiciously about how to strengthen the quality of education and leadership and management. After careful research, you made a significant investment in reading and curriculum resources and adopted a fresh approach to teaching phonics and the structure of the curriculum. These new programmes have been implemented successfully, with staff receiving high-quality training to ensure consistency across the school. However, revisions made to the curriculum were only introduced in September, so it is too soon to evaluate their impact on pupils’ achievement and subject leader development.

p.2

Main findings

You have placed reading at the heart of the curriculum. Staff share your ambition for every child to be a reader. Phonics is taught consistently in each class in the early years and key stage 1. The curriculum is highly structured. The reading leader makes sure that all pupils receive high-quality input. There is already early evidence to show that every child in the Reception year has successfully learned the sounds and letters covered this term. This shows that the programme has got off to a highly positive start. You have also sharpened the support for lower attaining readers in other year groups to help them catch up quickly. For example, you have directed and made good use of the government’s tutor funding to provide daily reading support for pupils in Year 1. Books now fully match the letters and sounds pupils learn. Pupils take home books that they can phonically decode to reinforce what they learn in school.

p.2

Main findings

You have adopted a new approach to how most curriculum subjects are taught. Subject leaders have dedicated time each half term to monitor their respective subjects. You have established a system of reporting to hold these leaders to account. Subject leaders talk to pupils and check pupils’ work to assess how well they recall and understand what they have learned. However, not all leaders have checked on the consistency and quality of curriculum delivery this term. Also, some subject leaders lack the training and experience to be critically evaluative in the reports they produce. As a result, these leaders do not pinpoint precisely where greater improvements could be made.

p.2

Main findings

Staff use a combination of formative and summative methods to check how well pupils understand their learning. Quizzes are used at the end of units taught to see what pupils can remember. However, some subjects are taught in two-week blocks rather than across the year. This can mean that pupils do not revisit some subjects for a substantial period of time. Staff are unclear how well pupils recall information in the long term or the impact of long breaks on their subject knowledge. Additionally, in some subjects, there is a lack of information about the achievement of individual pupils and those with differing abilities. This limits leaders’ ability to track the progress of all pupils in all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are dedicated and determined to improve the quality of education for all pupils. They are clear about their roles and responsibilities. Governors utilise their own professional skills well to provide a good balance of challenge and support for staff and leaders. Through school visits and information shared, governors have a detailed awareness of the actions taken to improve reading and strengthen the curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

You and your staff appreciate the support provided by the local authority and Department for Education’s ‘Trust and School Improvement Offer’. This support has helped develop your strategic skills and aid leaders’ subject leadership expertise. Reading leaders have also welcomed specialist help from the English Hub and phonics consultant to ensure that the early reading programme has been implemented consistently and effectively. This has boosted staff confidence and reassured them that the systems in place are robust and sustainable.

p.3

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner, and the director of children's services for Worcestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion