Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Smart Learning Nursery

Inspected 29 Nov 2022 · published 26 Jan 2023 · URN EY474090

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Seema Parmar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Syed, Monuzza Saeed

  • Group reference verified

    RP906389

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Seema Parmar

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    HA8 7UH

  • Name on report verified

    Smart Learning Nursery

  • URN verified

    EY474090

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 55% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentfeel safesecureenjoywell behavedwarmcaringhappy
Criticismconcernsnot alwayscompromisedweaknessesnot effectivenot effectivelynot consistentlynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings621w−23
  • Safeguarding233w−52

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
823
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 1
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Safeguarding 17%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Inspection of Smart Learning Nursery Commercial Unit, Mayfair Court, 76 Stonegrove, EDGWARE, Middlesex HA8 7UH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's welfare is compromised at the setting because the provider and staff are not clear about the local safeguarding partners reporting procedures. This means that any concerns about children's welfare may not be managed appropriately.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The quality of teaching is not yet good enough. This is because the provider does not fully monitor the quality of provision or staff practice to ensure teaching is to a consistent and required standard. The quality of teaching is variable within the setting. Staff encourage children to explore resources, but in their interactions with children, they do not consistently extend their play and build on their learning. As a result, children do not gain the full benefit of the curriculum.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Despite this, children are warmly greeted by the staff as they arrive at the nursery. Children show they feel safe and secure with their familiar adults. They behave well throughout the nursery. They learn to be independent. Even the youngest children know how to sit at mealtimes and use a fork or spoon to feed themselves. Children learn about tidying up and washing hands, integral to their routines. Older children help themselves and support younger children with their water beakers. This supports children in developing their independence and taking care of themselves and others.

p.2

need to do better?

n Staff say they feel supported and that their well-being is promoted. However, the provider does not adequately monitor the quality of staff practice to help identify and address weaknesses. n Staff's planning of activities is not precisely focused on children's individual learning needs and does not always support or build on what they already know and can do. During some activities, staff do not effectively support younger children or provide sufficient challenge to pre-school children to build and extend their learning. Some activities are not matched to younger children's stage of development, hindering their learning experiences. n Generally, staff promote children's communication and language well. Children build their vocabulary as they sing action nursery rhymes, learning to associate words with actions. Staff use open-ended questions with pre-school children during story time. They encourage the children to think for themselves and

p.2

need to do better?

remember what they know. However, staff do not effectively engage the younger children during story times. This means they lose interest. Furthermore, there are no alternative activities for them to choose, as these have been tidied away. n Children enjoy social mealtimes together, with staff reminding children to chew their food and check they have enough food. However, at times, staff do not

p.2

need to do better?

29 November 2022 maximise quality interactions during these mealtimes, as they prioritise other non-contact routine tasks. Some children are expected to sit for excessive periods of time during transitions of routines. Despite this, children are tolerant, show their patience and await instructions about what to do next. Children are really well behaved. n Children show they feel at ease in the care of staff, who are warm and caring towards them. Children benefit from a calm environment, which helps them to feel relaxed. However, staff do not always support children's understanding about maintaining their privacy while using the toilet. n The provider completes adequate risk assessments to ensure that children are cared for in a secure, safe and child-friendly environment. n Parents comment that they are happy with the care provided and receive regular feedback at drop-off and collection times, in addition to a daily written

p.2

need to do better?

communication book where they may add their comments. However, not all parents are aware of their children's progress, learning and next steps.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The provider and staff demonstrate their awareness about how to identify welfare concerns. However, staff do not have a secure understanding of the reporting procedures to follow. They say they would report this to the provider and the local authority. Staff are unfamiliar with the setting's safeguarding policy and procedures, which do not include the contact details about who to contact in the local authority. The provider who is the designated lead for safeguarding is not familiar about the roles of whom she should report welfare concerns about children and the role of local authority designated officer, in line with their local safeguarding partners procedures. The provider carries out suitability checks to ensure staff working with children are suitable. Staff supervise children appropriately to make sure they are within sight and hearing.

p.3

Due date

improve management and staff's knowledge about how to manage concerns and the reporting procedures to follow, including what to do when an allegation is made against a member of staff, in line with the local safeguarding partners procedures 10/01/2023

p.3

Due date

29 November 2022 improve the quality of the curriculum planning and delivery, so that all children benefit from age-appropriate and consistent learning and development experiences 10/01/2023

p.3

Due date

develop effective arrangements for the supervision of staff, to drive consistency across the educational programmes and in how parents are involved in their children's progress and next steps. 10/01/2023

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY474090 Local authority Barnet Inspection number 10259645 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 21 Name of registered person Syed, Monuzza Saeed

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 020 8958 5557 Date of previous inspection 28 November 2017

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Smart Learning Nursery registered in 2014. It is owned by a private provider and operates from commercial premises in a residential block of flats in Edgware in the London Borough of Barnet. The nursery is open each weekday, from 8am to 6pm, all year round, except for bank holidays. The nursery receives funding for the provision of free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. The nursery employs seven staff; six of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 and/or level 3.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The provider and inspector completed a learning discussion together about the early years curriculum. n The inspector spoke to the provider, staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector carried out a joint observation of a group activity with the provider. n Parents spoke with the inspector during the inspection and their views were taken into account. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact this was having on children's learning. n The inspector looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. n This was a risk assessed inspection.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

29 November 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion