Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

St Felix Roman Catholic Primary School, Haverhill

Inspected 18 Nov 2022 · published 25 Jan 2023 · URN 143624

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Anna Vaughan, Oriana Dalton, Sam Nixon

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CB9 9DE

  • Name on report verified

    St Felix Roman Catholic Primary School, Haverhill

  • URN verified

    143624

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsenjoystrongeffectivestrong relationshipswell-plannedambitiouspositively
Criticismweaknessesgapsnot effectiveseriousstruggleweakharmweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1232w+4
  • Safeguarding120w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,311
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 53
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%Safeguarding 6%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of St Felix Roman Catholic Primary School, Haverhill School Lane, Haverhill, Suffolk CB9 9DE

p.1

Inspection dates: 17 and 18 November 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Early years provision Inadequate Previous inspection grade Good 17 and 18 November 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils enjoy coming to school. They make friends and like their teachers. A range of clubs and extra-curricular activities support pupils’ development of interests and character. Pupils are encouraged to take up a range of roles which develop their leadership skills. However, there are large gaps in the curriculum, meaning pupils do not learn the vital knowledge they need to take their next steps.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

There is a strong sense of community in this school, underpinned by their Catholic values. Pupils are taught how to care for other people. They demonstrate kindness and a compassion for each other.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils respond positively to the leaders’ high expectations of their behaviour. Pupils are polite and show good manners. They behave well in lessons and when moving around the school. There is a calm and orderly atmosphere in the school, with strong relationships between staff and pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. Bullying rarely occurs. Staff address friendship issues quickly. Pupils know that if they have a problem, there is always someone they can talk to. They trust adults in school.

p.2

better?

Leaders are beginning to address serious weaknesses in the curriculum. However, there is significant work still to do to ensure that pupils receive an acceptable standard of education. Subject plans do not set out what pupils need to learn and in what order. Staff often teach the same content to all pupils without checking what pupils have learned before. This means that pupils do not build on what they have been taught already. They struggle to recall what they have learned previously.

p.2

better?

In subjects such as science and music, pupils do not learn the content set out in the national curriculum. Pupils leave the school without the knowledge they need for secondary school.

p.2

better?

Over the last three months, leaders have begun to make changes for the better. Previous weaknesses in the leadership structure of the school have been addressed and changes are beginning to improve the school for pupils. For example, there is a new programme for phonics, with a range of support for weaker readers. However, there is still no whole-school reading curriculum in place. This means that pupils who have mastered the basics do not go on to be skilled readers.

p.2

better?

Until recently, leaders’ evaluation of the school’s curriculum relied too heavily on the scrutiny of assessment data. Gaps in pupils’ learning are not picked up quickly by teachers as they rely on termly tests to tell them how pupils are doing. Pupils who become confused or make mistakes are not identified quickly and supported well. Leaders know that staff need training to improve. This work is at an early stage and has not yet had the required impact. 17 and 18 November 2022

p.2

3

Staff have tried their best to interpret and deliver the curriculum. However, leaders have not provided them with effective training. Staff struggle as they do not understand some of the content in subjects such as music and history.

p.3

3

Pupils in early years follow well-established routines. Staff provide children with a range of activities, which they enjoy. However, the curriculum in the early years is disorganised. Leaders have not considered what children need to know and understand to be ready for key stage 1. Children in the early years are not well prepared for their next steps.

p.3

3

Provision for pupils with special education needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is weak. The systems for identifying pupils’ needs are underdeveloped. Tasks and activities are not adapted to meet these pupils’ individual needs. Staff helping these pupils have not received effective training to be able to support pupils with SEND well. Pupils with SEND are cared for emotionally. However, they do not make the academic progress they should.

p.3

3

There is a strong and well-planned personal, social, health and economic education curriculum. Assemblies, wider opportunities, clubs and visits develop pupils’ understanding of British values, such as respect, democracy and tolerance. These opportunities help pupils appreciate that individual characteristics make people unique, and differences should be celebrated. Staff help pupils become resilient and confident by giving them a range of roles and responsibilities. Pupils demonstrate care and respect for others.

p.3

3

Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils behave well. Rare cases of low-level disruption in lessons are addressed by staff quickly.

p.3

3

Governors and trustees are committed to and passionate about the school. Previously, they have not possessed the required knowledge to hold leaders to account for the quality of education the school provides. They have not taken effective action to ensure that timely improvements to the school curriculum are made. Recent changes to the leadership structure of the school have improved governors’ oversight of the school’s performance.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff receive regular and appropriate safeguarding training. They know how to identify and support vulnerable pupils. They understand their safeguarding responsibilities. Required recruitment checks are completed before staff start work at the school.

p.3

Safeguarding

There is a clear system of keeping safeguarding records, which staff understand. However, occasionally this is not followed. This is easy to put right and does not leave pupils either being harmed or at risk of harm. 17 and 18 November 2022

p.3

4

Through the curriculum, pupils learn how to keep safe. Pupils trust adults in school. They know where to go to get help when they need it. Pupils learn about different types of risk and how to stay safe online.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In some subjects, for example in science and music, the curriculum does not cover all the national curriculum requirements. Pupils do not learn all the knowledge they need to be ready for the next stage of their education. Leaders must ensure that the school curriculum is sufficiently broad and ambitious.  There is no coherent reading curriculum from the early years to Year 6. Pupils do not learn how to interpret, consider and enjoy interesting texts. Leaders should ensure that a comprehensive reading curriculum is in place that exposes pupils to rich and varied texts and builds their understanding of literature.  Assessment is not used effectively. Leaders and staff rely too much on data. Staff do not pick up on mistakes quickly enough, meaning pupils have gaps in their knowledge. Effective assessment processes must be put in place so teachers know what pupils have learned and lessons can quickly address any

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

misconceptions pupils have.  Teachers do not identify and support pupils with SEND well enough. These pupils do not achieve as highly as they could. Leaders should ensure that staff receive training to adapt their teaching, so that pupils with SEND learn well in all subjects.  Governors and trustees do not monitor the effectiveness of school curriculum robustly enough. As a result, they have an overgenerous and incorrect understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Trust leaders should review their processes so that trustees and governors can form an accurate view of the school’s performance and check that improvements are effective.  There are minor weaknesses in the recording of safeguarding incidents. These have not left pupils at risk of harm. Leaders should ensure that all staff know how to report safeguarding concerns and that their subsequent actions are recorded on the central system.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 17 and 18 November 2022

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 17 and 18 November 2022

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10241053 Type of school Primary

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 18 and 19 September 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 St Felix Roman Catholic Primary School is part of Our Lady of Walsingham Catholic Multi Academy Trust.  The school does not currently use any alternative provision.  The school has a nursery class.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. 17 and 18 November 2022

p.6

7

 Inspectors met with the headteacher, assistant headteacher, the special education needs coordinator and the designated safeguarding lead.  Inspectors met groups of staff and members of the local governing body and trust representatives.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science, history and music. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  The lead inspector listened to pupils read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors considered the school’s safeguarding documentation, including safeguarding checks carried out on staff working at school. They reviewed how well the designated safeguarding leads act on concerns about pupils’ welfare. Inspectors talked to staff, governors and pupils about how the school keeps them

p.7

7

safe.  Inspectors considered the 15 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Ofsted Parent View, including 15 free-text responses, 25 responses to the Ofsted’s staff survey and 52 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey.

p.7

Inspection team

Anna Vaughan, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Oriana Dalton Ofsted Inspector 17 and 18 November 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion