Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

The Rochford Day Nursery

Inspected 15 Nov 2022 · published 20 Jan 2023 · URN 402557

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Bradley, Michael Peter

  • Group reference verified

    RP513603

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Shelly McDougall, Sue Buckingham

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SS4 1NJ

  • Name on report verified

    The Rochford Day Nursery

  • URN verified

    402557

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−62Very criticalmore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivesafeenjoysecurestrengthsconsistently
Criticismfailpoordo not knowfailsineffectiveweaknessesnot effectivecompromised

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings850w−85
  • Safeguarding230w−4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,046
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 58, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 1
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Safeguarding 15%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection of The Rochford Day Nursery 2-4 Ashingdon Road, Rochford, Essex SS4 1NJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's safety and well-being are not assured. The management team has not considered all the potential risks that children could be exposed to, particularly on nursery outings. For example, on the day of inspection, some babies were taken out for a walk in the rain. Staff said they were taking them to the duck pond. They spent most of the morning out of the setting. When staff returned, they explained that they had also been to the linked nursery with the babies. The management team were unable to demonstrate that these staff held current paediatric first-aid certificates. This does not help keep children safe in the event of an emergency.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Not all children have the same learning experiences as others. The deployment of staff is disorganised, and this fails to ensure that all children's needs are met. Some staff are unaware of the capabilities and stages of development of children because they work at the linked setting. They do not know who among the children receive additional funding, to enable them to provide suitable levels of support. Activities for younger children are mundane and lack appropriate levels of challenge. Children wander around unable to find something exciting to inspire their imaginative skills. Staff lead some activities so much it hinders children's learning. For example, they overlook the opportunity to allow children to practise using scissors to cut out pictures from a catalogue. This prevents children from developing their fine motor skills. Older children thoroughly enjoy playing in the outside area. Staff join them as they hold hands and sing action songs. Children

p.2

The provision is inadequate

twirl and dance to the movements of the songs.

p.2

need to do better?

n The key-person system is ineffective, and staff deployment is poor. Some staff do not know the children well enough to build a secure relationship with them. The management team does not ensure that all staff are able to meet every child's care and development needs, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). For example, a staff member was sent home earlier than expected even though they believed they were working until lunchtime. Furthermore, several staff arrived from a linked nursery to care for children, despite the manager confirming at the start of the inspection that no additional staff were due to arrive. n Children are not always supervised consistently when eating. Staff fail to ensure that children do not wander around while eating their snacks. This poses a risk of choking. Babies sit on the floor to eat their snacks. Staff do not notice when babies drop their fruit on the floor and then pick it up and eat it. This does not

p.2

need to do better?

protect children's physical health. n The quality of teaching is poor. Children do not receive the level of good-quality education to which they are entitled. For example, staff working with the babies

p.2

need to do better?

15 November 2022 share that the next steps are to help develop and strengthen their physical skills. However, there are very few resources to help babies to pull themselves up to standing. This does not help children to reach their full potential. n Staff working with older children understand that they need to hear a wide range of vocabulary. During activities, they talk to children about what they are making and what food they like to eat. Staff support older children's understanding of new words, such as 'prediction', as they think about what items will sink or float in their science experiment. n Children's imaginative skills are not sufficiently supported, as staff do not know their interests. Staff intervene when children are trying to move resources to support their play. For instance, children try to use their experiences from home in role play and want to sit at the wooden table. However, staff prevent them

p.2

need to do better?

from taking a chair to the table, which immediately halts their play. n Staff do not support or help children to learn and manage their behaviour. For example, some children have planned strategies, such as picture communication cards. These are in place to aid their understanding of routine. However, staff do not use these to help children to regulate their behaviour. Staff do not redirect children's play. For instance, when children draw on the floor with chalk, staff discourage this interest. They fail to offer an acceptable alternative place where they can practise their early mark-making skills. n The management team fail to implement regular supervision meetings for all staff. This does not provide staff with opportunities to receive targeted training, support or coaching. Consequently, the management team do not have a clear oversight of each staff member's strengths and weaknesses. n Parents are kept updated on their children's achievements and daily activities

p.3

need to do better?

through an online platform. Staff set challenges for children's home learning where children can achieve 'learner of the month'. This helps parents to feel part of their children's learning journey and promotes continuity between home and the nursery.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Children's welfare is compromised. The management team does not make sure that the key-person system and staff deployment keeps children safe and meets their individual needs. Staff on outings do not hold a relevant first-aid qualification to help protect children in the event of an emergency. The management team do not ensure that staff supervise children when they are eating to keep them safe. Staff recognise the signs of abuse, such as radicalisation, and the procedures to follow. They know the action they need to take to report any safeguarding concerns about children's welfare or a colleagues' practice. The nursery is secure, to prevent unauthorised individuals entering the building and children leaving.

p.3

Due date

provide effective supervision and support to raise the quality of teaching to help ensure children receive good-quality education and care 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

make sure that at least one person holds a current paediatric first-aid certificate when accompanying children on trips and outings 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure the key-person system meets the needs of all children 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure staff deployment arrangements are effective, to keep children safe and meet their individual needs 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

make sure that children's good health and hygiene are always promoted, particularly at snack and mealtimes 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure that staff implement procedures to help children manage their own behaviour 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

take action to improve arrangements to consistently support children with SEND. 02/12/2022

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 402557 Local authority Essex Inspection number 10261296 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises

p.5

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 85 Number of children on roll 97 Name of registered person Bradley, Michael Peter

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 01702549549 Date of previous inspection 23 August 2018

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The Rochford Day Nursery registered in 2001. The nursery employs 25 members of childcare staff. Of these, 15 hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery opens Monday to Friday, all year round. Opening times are from 7am until 6.30pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three-, and four-year old children.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors Shelly McDougall Sue Buckingham

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information we received about the provider. n The manager and inspector completed a learning walk together of all areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n Staff spoke to the inspectors during the inspection. n The inspectors spoke with the registered individual about the leadership and management of the nursery. n The inspectors looked at relevant documentation and reviewed evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

15 November 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion