Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Weald of Kent Grammar School

Inspected — · published 19 Jan 2023 · URN 136455

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Louise Walker (lead), Andrew Platt, Harry Ingham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Platt, Harry Ingham, Louise Walker

  • Postcode verified

    TN9 2JP

  • Name on report verified

    Weald of Kent Grammar School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositivelystrengthsimprovingconsistentaccurate
Criticismweaknessesnot confidentrequires improvementconcernsnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
763
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Sophie Clark Acting Headteacher Weald of Kent Grammar School Tudeley Lane Tonbridge Kent TN9 2JP

p.1

School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 9 November 2022, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school received a judgement of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspection.

p.1

School

I was accompanied by Louise Walker, His Majesty’s Inspector, and Michael Boddington, Stuart Edwards, Julia Mortimore and Andrew Platt, Ofsted Inspectors. During the inspection, we discussed with you and other senior leaders, staff and trustees the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. I also evaluated the school’s improvement plan. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The inspection team visited lessons to observe learning, met with groups of pupils and staff, and scrutinised samples of pupils’ work. We have considered all this in coming to our judgement.

p.1

Main findings

There have been significant changes in the leadership of the school since the last section 5 inspection. You were appointed as acting headteacher in July 2022. A new chair of the board of trustees was elected in October 2022. You have also appointed heads of year at both school sites. You, your leadership team and trustees have taken decisive action to ensure that the school improves towards becoming good in all areas. Importantly, you are committed to making sure that the views of staff, parents and pupils are thoroughly considered in this journey. You have carefully designed the strategic plan for improvement and ensure that leaders monitor and evaluate actions closely. You have also set measurable targets to reflect the intended impact of ongoing work around the weaknesses identified in the previous inspection.

p.1

Main findings

Trustees are beginning to hold leaders to account more effectively. For instance, they are checking more rigorously on the impact of leaders’ actions. Trustees also visit school to gather first-hand information. They use these visits to speak to leaders and staff about the school’s work. Trustees are also making themselves more available to staff and more visible at school events.

p.2

Main findings

Staff benefit from the training that you and your leadership team provide. Training for teachers is focused currently on ways to check pupils’ understanding more effectively. Support staff are provided with training on how to support pupils in different subjects. Staff now view support and training more positively. They report that leaders are promoting a more open and transparent atmosphere. However, much of the work in this area is in the early stages.

p.2

Main findings

Staff particularly appreciate that their welfare and well-being is a high priority for leaders. As one said, ‘There is focus and clarity around where leaders are taking the school. They are working hard and listening to us.’ You are also improving communication with parents. For example, you now provide information evenings where leaders outline changes in school policies.

p.2

Main findings

Not all pupils feel confident in speaking to staff about bullying or friendship issues. You have introduced initiatives to ensure that pupils are more aware of the avenues of support open to them. For example, you have introduced ‘peer mentors’. Older pupils act as peer mentors in Year 7 tutor groups, advising pupils on the best courses of action if they have any worries or concerns. Younger pupils are more aware of how to access student services and the adults they should approach if they need help. However, older pupils remain less confident about how effectively adults deal with incidents of bullying.

p.2

Main findings

You have consulted staff and pupils and are currently refining the school’s behaviour policy. At the start of the year you reinforced behaviour expectations with staff and pupils in assemblies and form tutor sessions. Some pupils feel that this helped to make staff’s expectations more consistent. However, other pupils believe that there are still subjects where pupils are not treated fairly.

p.2

Main findings

External support is helping you and your leadership team to gain an objective view of the impact of the strategic improvement plan. You have also benefited from working with colleagues from a local school. You and your team now have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion