Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

New Meaning Foundation

Inspected 20 Oct 2022 · published 18 Jan 2023 · URN 2691311

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shane Langthorne

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Oct 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Shane Langthorne

  • Postcode verified

    CB4 2HY

  • Name on report verified

    New Meaning Foundation

  • URN verified

    2691311

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrongindependentclearlyfeel safeeffectivesafesecure
Criticismerrorsfailureinsufficientyet tounclearstrugglebelownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,237
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

New Meaning Foundation Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Shane Langthorne, His Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Inspection dates: 19 and 20 October 2022

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider Address: Future Business Centre Kings Hedges Road Cambridge CB4 2HY Monitoring visit: New Meaning Foundation, 19 and 20 October 2022

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From March 2019, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of adult learning provision which began to be funded from August 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

New Meaning Foundation is an independent learning provider that teaches adult learning programmes in construction skills, English, mathematics, digital skills and employability. It received a contract to provide adult learning programmes in 2021 and commenced delivery in October 2021. Learners are predominately recruited from the formerly homeless community in and around Cambridge. The construction-based programme is centred around building prefabricated self-contained homes (micro homes) for the homeless. At the time of the monitoring visit there were fewer than five learners enrolled and all were adults over the age of 19.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have been unable to introduce all aspects of the planned curriculum. For example, they were unable to teach functional skills English or digital skills in the first year. The sequencing of the curriculum is heavily linked to the build stages of the micro homes. As a result, building projects are prioritised over teaching activity.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Senior leaders and governors have high ambitions for their learners. Leaders work effectively with the combined mayoral authority to design the programme. They intend for adult learners from the formerly homeless community to improve their life chances and gain employment.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders work closely with a wide range of employers and charitable organisations as part of the ‘Future In’ network to enrich learners’ experiences. For example, learners gain practical work skills through building projects such as a forest shelter for a local charity.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders have ensured that learners have appropriate resources to develop their practical skills. Learners use workshop equipment effectively to develop a wide range of construction skills. However, learners have not had enough opportunity to develop their digital skills further. Monitoring visit: New Meaning Foundation, 19 and 20 October 2022 Staff have relevant qualifications. Leaders ensure that teaching staff receive relevant training to enhance their teaching and safeguarding skills. Teaching staff complete suitable programmes to improve their skills in identifying and supporting learners with learning difficulties.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have enough oversight of the quality of education and training they provide. Leaders review aspects of education and training, such as observing teachers’ practice in lessons.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Governance arrangements are insufficient. Trustees do not have a clear understanding of the quality of education. They do not receive sufficient information to hold leaders and staff to account. For example, they do not have adequate oversight of learners’ progress in English and mathematics. As a result, they are unable to provide appropriate support and challenge to staff.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not ensure that learners recruited are suitable for the course. As a result, most learners leave without achieving a qualification. Leaders have reviewed their recruitment practices but have yet to take on more learners. As a result inspectors cannot judge the impact of these changes.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Vocational teaching staff do not develop learners’ existing skills and knowledge fully in English and mathematics. Learners’ English and mathematics skills are tested at the beginning of their course. However teachers do not use these to establish learners’ starting points or to plan and teach their learning activities. Teachers identify most errors in written work. They encourage learners to amend errors, such as failure to use full stops and to write clearly.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Teachers sequence the curriculum for the level 2 multi-skills qualification appropriately. They prioritise the development of learners’ health and safety knowledge and behaviours at the start of the programme. Learners develop significant new knowledge skills and behaviours related to construction skills, such as carpentry, plumbing and tiling. Learners value highly the variety of skills they learn and the breadth of trades they experience in building micro homes. As a result, learners are enthused and quickly develop their confidence in a real work environment.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Teachers use questioning effectively in practical sessions to test learners’ understanding. Teachers give regular verbal feedback to learners on the quality of their practical work. They explain clearly how learners can improve. Learners value this immediate and helpful advice, which enables them to quickly improve their skills. Monitoring visit: New Meaning Foundation, 19 and 20 October 2022 However, teachers do not provide sufficiently developmental feedback on learners’ written work. Too much written feedback is cursory and unhelpful. As a result, learners are unclear what they need to do to improve.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Teachers do not provide learners with a comprehensive record of progress across the whole course. While learners understand their progress on the vocational elements they study, they do not understand sufficiently their progress on the wider skills. For example, their records do not contain sufficient details of future targets for English and digital skills development. Learners that remain struggle to complete the course on time.

p.4

Significant progress

Learners feel safe and are safe. Leaders have developed an effective culture of safeguarding. They ensure that staff have received appropriate safeguarding training, including about the ‘Prevent’ duty. Leaders have a strong focus on mental health support.

p.4

Significant progress

Leaders use the local services available to support their safeguarding practices. For example, leaders work closely with the local authority multi-agency safeguarding hub and mental health referral services.

p.4

Significant progress

Leaders use information they receive from the local authority to keep staff and learners informed. This includes the risks associated with county lines, which are prevalent in the area. Where safeguarding risks have been identified, leaders have taken appropriate action, for example referrals to outside agencies for drug abuse support, GP referrals and psychiatric referrals.

p.4

Significant progress

Leaders follow safer recruitment practices. Where adult learners are working alongside school-aged children, leaders ensure the safety of the children because older learners are DBS checked. Monitoring visit: New Meaning Foundation, 19 and 20 October 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Significant progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Significant progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Significant progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Significant progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion