Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
Anne Maingay (lead), Dave Gilkerson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anne Maingay, Dave Gilkerson
- Postcode verified
NN3 7AR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have not ensured that they have a clear overview of individual pupils’ SEND provision. p.3
- They do not have an accurate view of the specific short-term targets that pupils should be working towards. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that pupils, parents and teachers understand the small steps of learning that pupils should achieve to help them build towards the end targets in their EHC plans. p.3
- Leaders have only very recently started to address the issues with the curriculum that they have identified. p.3
- Pupils experience an acceptable standard of education but do not yet benefit from a clearly designed curriculum pathway that is best suited to their individual needs. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that all teachers are fully resourced to provide a curriculum that meets the needs of all pupils at the school. p.3
- I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for West Northamptonshire. p.3
- This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 956
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Helen McCormack Headteacher Kings Meadow School Manning Road Moulton Leys Northampton Northamptonshire NN3 7AR
p.1
Urgent inspection of Kings Meadow School
Following my visit with Anne Maingay, His Majesty's Inspector, to your school on 22 November 2022, I write on behalf of His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss your school.
p.1
Urgent inspection of Kings Meadow School
This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for urgent inspections. The inspection was carried out because His Majesty's Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements at the school as concerns had been raised with Ofsted.
p.1
Urgent inspection of Kings Meadow School
We do not give graded judgements on urgent inspections. However, if we find some evidence that overall standards may be declining, but where no serious concerns have been identified, then the next inspection will normally be a graded inspection, which will be carried out under section 5 of the Act and be brought forward. If we have serious concerns, we will deem the urgent inspection as a graded inspection immediately.
p.1
Evidence
We met with you, other senior leaders and groups of staff. I also spoke to a representative of the local authority on the telephone.
p.1
Evidence
We visited lessons, spoke to pupils, observed the school routines and scrutinised a range of documents and school records related to safeguarding, attendance and behaviour. This included a scrutiny of the school’s single central record and a review of child protection records. We looked at planning leaders had provided for the personal, social, health and economic education curriculum. We also scrutinised a selection of pupils’ education, health and care (EHC) plans and talked to leaders about the provision for these pupils.
p.1
Evidence
Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.2
Main Findings
Leaders have ensured that pupils feel safe at the school. They have provided high-quality safeguarding training and updates for all staff. Leaders are quick to act when they have a concern about pupils’ welfare, involving other agencies when needed. They have appropriate procedures in place to manage any allegations about adults.
p.2
Main Findings
The school has a strong safeguarding culture. Staff understand their responsibility to use their knowledge of pupils to identify any concerns about their welfare. They know to report any such concerns immediately. The strong relationships staff have with pupils create a safe environment for pupils to share any worries or concerns they may have.
p.2
Main Findings
Pupils learn about how to stay safe, including when online. All pupils with whom inspectors met said that they feel safe.
p.2
Main Findings
Leaders stated that there have been historic difficulties in ensuring that the school had adequate numbers of staff. This was particularly the case when staffing levels were affected by absences related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Inspectors were assured during their visit that the current ratio of staff to pupils is adequate to ensure the safety of pupils. There is no indication that pupils’ needs are not met due to low staff numbers. Some staff feel that it has become harder to meet the more complex needs of pupils that have recently joined the school. They are concerned that some experienced staff have left the school and that the current staff arrangements are putting extra work and pressure on them.
p.2
Main Findings
Leaders have identified certain aspects of the school’s provision to further develop. They know the current curriculum is not tailored carefully enough to meet all the varied needs of all pupils. Leaders have started to re-design the curriculum into three specific pathways to more effectively support pupils at different levels of engagement with education. However, they have not ensured that they have a strategic overview of all the pupils’ needs as outlined in their EHC plans.
p.2
Additional support
The school is in the process of joining a multi-academy trust (MAT). Leaders from the MAT have provided extra capacity for leadership at the school as well as administrative support. They have been proactive in this provision even though the school is not yet part of the trust. This has given school leaders confidence that when they join the trust they will benefit from access to a larger staff resource. The local authority has provided regular advice and support which have helped to identify some key priorities for improvement around the curriculum. The extra leadership capacity provided by the trust has allowed some early work to be completed on the redevelopment of the curriculum. Leaders have identified the need for more external support from therapists and have secured extra therapy time in the school for pupils. They have also identified where there are shortcomings in their strategic overview of individual provision for special educational
p.2
Priorities for further improvement
Leaders have not ensured that they have a clear overview of individual pupils’ SEND provision. They do not have an accurate view of the specific short-term targets that pupils should be working towards. Leaders need to ensure that pupils, parents and teachers understand the small steps of learning that pupils should achieve to help them build towards the end targets in their EHC plans. Leaders have only very recently started to address the issues with the curriculum that they have identified. Pupils experience an acceptable standard of education but do not yet benefit from a clearly designed curriculum pathway that is best suited to their individual needs. Leaders need to ensure that all teachers are fully resourced to provide a curriculum that meets the needs of all pupils at the school.
p.3
Priorities for further improvement
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for West Northamptonshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion