Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Mark Hall Academy

Inspected 9 Nov 2022 · published 17 Jan 2023 · URN 148423

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Charlie Fordham, Elizabeth Shapland, James Adkins, Sue Smith

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CM17 9LR

  • Name on report verified

    Mark Hall Academy

  • URN verified

    148423

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationGood

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyeffectivelystrongwell designedambitiousimprovedhappyknowledgeable
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsdisruptiontoo manydo not knownot effectivelysuspensions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings977w+42
  • Safeguarding110w−3
  • What needs to improve37w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,100
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 57, typical 56
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection of Mark Hall Academy First Avenue, Harlow CM17 9LR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

Previous inspection grade Not previously inspected under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 8 and 9 November 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

At Mark Hall Academy, pupils have experienced a lot of change in the last two years. They have many new teachers. Some of this has been unsettling. That said, pupils see how their quality of education has improved considerably. They learn a curriculum that helps them achieve well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils recognise that expectations of behaviour are much higher than they used to be. This mostly creates orderly behaviour. However, some pupils say that staff do not apply leaders’ expectations fairly or consistently. Sometimes, when pupils get in trouble, their behaviour does not improve.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. They say that bullying is not common, and that leaders resolve issues well. Pupils praise how leaders deal decisively with any discrimination or unkind language.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) receive strong support. The calmness of the Orchard, the space set aside for them, supports their well-being. Many parents of pupils with SEND value the clinics and support sessions leaders put on.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils, especially younger ones, are happy at the school. However, too many do not feel leaders listen to their views. The curriculum for personal development does not help pupils to understand fully the ethos leaders are promoting.

p.2

better?

The trust has acted decisively to raise standards in the school. They have put in place a high degree of support, such as bringing in leaders from other trust schools. This has led to rapid improvements in key areas. These include the quality of education, safeguarding, the provision for pupils with SEND and the way staff deal with bullying.

p.2

better?

Leaders have reviewed the curriculum. They have put in place one that is well designed and relevant to the school’s context. Leaders make sure pupils’ learning builds on prior knowledge. They are ambitious for all pupils to achieve well. For example, leaders ensure the weakest readers get the help they need to read fluently and access the curriculum.

p.2

better?

Teachers deliver the curriculum effectively. They are well trained and knowledgeable. When teachers are new to the school or the profession, they get the support they need. Teachers plan activities that support pupils to understand and remember the key knowledge. This includes for pupils with SEND. If pupils have misunderstandings, these get corrected. As a result, pupils develop what they know and can do. 8 and 9 November 2022

p.2

3

Leaders have put in place a clear behaviour policy. However, they do not ensure that staff apply this consistently. Because of this, low-level disruption does not get dealt with as well as it should. This frustrates pupils who want to learn.

p.3

3

Leaders have not prioritised pupils’ wider development. While there is a well- considered curriculum for personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education, it is not always delivered effectively. Because of this, pupils’ learning experience is, at times, disjointed. They do not develop a deep enough understanding of learning that is important for their personal development, such as about healthy relationships. This does not help pupils buy into the values of the school. That said, pupils do learn much of what they need to be ready for life in the adult world. For example, pupils with SEND learn about democracy, and then meet the local MP and visit Westminster. Leaders make sure that pupils receive helpful guidance about their career choices.

p.3

3

Many parents appreciate the improvements that leaders have made. However, many others do not support or understand what leaders are doing. Leaders have not always explained to the community the reasons for change as well as they might.

p.3

3

Trustees check closely on the quality of the provision, such as equalities and the curriculum. Several governors are new to role. However, they know how to support and challenge leaders on their work. For instance, governors ask leaders probing questions about the reasons for suspensions. The trust and governors monitor leaders’ work on safeguarding effectively, and regularly recommend improvements.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders are vigilant with their safeguarding practices so that pupils are kept safe. Staff receive regular safeguarding training so they know how to spot and report concerns. Leaders respond to issues quickly and thoroughly. They make sure that information is clearly recorded and well shared so the best decisions can be made. Leaders make prompt and appropriate referrals to agencies where needed.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils learn how to keep safe through the curriculum. They know whom to talk to if they have concerns. Pupils value the helpful support for their mental health and well-being, including pupils with social and emotional needs. 8 and 9 November 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Leaders do not make sure that all staff apply the behaviour policy consistently. This means some pupils do not know what staff’s expectations are and do not respond as well as they might when told to follow school rules. Leaders need to ensure staff get the training they need so they know how to apply the behaviour policy consistently and effectively.  Leaders have not ensured that the PSHE curriculum is delivered consistently well. Because of this, pupils do not build up their understanding of what they need to learn in PSHE. This does not help them engage with the ethos leaders are promoting. Leaders need to prioritise the delivery of the PSHE curriculum and make sure that it is delivered as intended. This is so pupils develop the knowledge they need for their personal development, and can participate successfully in the wider culture of the school.  Leaders have made substantial changes to all areas of provision, but have not

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

explained the reasons for these changes well enough to some stakeholders. As a result, some parents and pupils do not understand or support the reasons for these changes. Leaders should engage better with parents and pupils, and explain more effectively the changes they make, so that parents and pupils can engage more readily with the improvements to the school.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 8 and 9 November 2022

p.4

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.5

Information about this school

 The school opened as an academy with BMAT Education Trust on 1 January 2021. When its predecessor school, also named Mark Hall Academy, was previously inspected by Ofsted in March 2020, it was judged to be inadequate overall.  Since opening, there have been multiple changes in leadership and staffing. Most senior leaders are new since then. This includes both of the deputy principals and the designated safeguarding lead.  The chair of governors was appointed on 1 September 2021. Most of the governing board members are new since the school joined the trust.  Since opening, leaders have restructured several aspects of provision, including safeguarding and pastoral leadership, the curriculum and the length of lessons.  Leaders use one alternative provider for a very small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 11 with information about approved technical

p.5

Information about this school

education qualifications and apprenticeships. 8 and 9 November 2022

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors held meetings with the chief executive officer of the trust, senior leaders, other leaders, staff and pupils.  As part of evaluating the quality of governance, the lead inspector met with the chair of the trust and the chair of governors.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, science, history, physical education, art and computer science. For each deep dive, inspectors met with subject leaders, looked at curriculum plans, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also evaluated the curriculum in some other subjects, notably mathematics, geography and modern foreign languages.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 As part of the evaluation of safeguarding, inspectors checked the school’s single central record, considered its safeguarding policy and procedures and spoke to leaders, staff, parents and pupils.  Inspectors evaluated the quality of the provision for pupils with SEND, including meeting with the special educational needs coordinator, speaking to a selection of pupils with SEND and speaking by phone with some of their parents.  Inspectors reviewed the 126 responses that were submitted from this academic year by parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, and 90 free- text responses submitted during the inspection. Inspectors considered the 38 responses to the staff survey and the 12 responses to the pupil survey. Inspectors made sure they met with a large number and wide range of pupils to gather their views.

p.6

Inspection team

Charlie Fordham, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Elizabeth Shapland Ofsted Inspector 8 and 9 November 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion