Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Lound Infant School
Summary
Andrew Cummings (lead), Dughall McCormick
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Nov 2022
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Cummings, Dughall McCormick
- Postcode verified
S35 2EU
- Name on report verified
Lound Infant School
- URN verified
139862
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are well behaved, polite, and eager to talk about what they like about their school. p.1
- Staff are proud to work at the school, which they say is well led by the headteacher. p.2
- Pupils enjoy coming to this positive, purposeful, and cheerful school. p.1
- Pupils enjoy their lessons and talk confidently about what they are learning. p.1
- One parent said, ‘I find the teachers go above and beyond to make the curriculum exciting and engaging.’ Staff are also positive and committed to their work at the school. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour, or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately. p.3
- Assessment across the curriculum is not always helpful in identifying the gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills and to allow teachers to plan next steps in learning precisely. p.1
- This means that teachers do not always have useful information to enable them to identify gaps in knowledge and plan next steps in learning with precision so that pupils can all build their learning on knowledge which is secure. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The plans identify the important knowledge and geographical vocabulary that pupils need to learn and when they need to learn it. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that assessment practice is developed that allows teachers to plan next steps in learning precisely, while being mindful of teachers’ workload. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment12
“Staff are proud to work at the school, which they say is well led by the headteacher.” p.2Reading & phonics6
“They enjoy the books and stories that are read to them.” p.1Communication & language5
“They are well behaved, polite, and eager to talk about what they like about their school.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,281
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 58, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: Lound Infant School Sherburn Gate, Chapeltown, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S35 2EU
p.1
Outcome
Lound Infant School continues to be a good school.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy coming to this positive, purposeful, and cheerful school. They are well behaved, polite, and eager to talk about what they like about their school. They are engaged in their lessons. At social times, they play actively and benefit from the activities that are provided for them.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are kind to each other. Bullying is a rare event. They feel confident that if they have a problem, staff will support them. There are a wide range of sports clubs that pupils can enjoy after school and leaders are planning to reintroduce further activities.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy their lessons and talk confidently about what they are learning. They enjoy the books and stories that are read to them. On the day of the inspection the story in assembly was ‘The Mole who Knew it was None of His Business’, which was a great hit with all the pupils.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have created a positive relationship between the school and its community. Staff and pupils have welcomed several new families to the school community over recent months. Almost all parents and carers who completed an inspection survey said they would recommend the school to others. One parent said, ‘I find the teachers go above and beyond to make the curriculum exciting and engaging.’ Staff are also positive and committed to their work at the school.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have created a broad and rich curriculum which they keep under constant review. It is designed carefully to ensure pupils can progress seamlessly to key stage 2. Leaders are reflective and always open to ways that could make things even better. Assessment across the curriculum is not always helpful in identifying the gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills and to allow teachers to plan next steps in learning precisely. Leaders have identified this and are working to improve assessment across all subjects. 3 November 2022
p.1
2
Reading is a priority at the school. Staff have benefited from extensive training and are very confident in their ability to teach pupils to read. Pupils are taught phonics with a carefully sequenced programme, which starts in the Reception classes. Children and pupils progress at their own pace through the programme to make sure that they gain a secure knowledge of the letters and sounds they need. Leaders think carefully about the books and stories that are read to children and pupils. This gives children and pupils exposure to a wide variety of texts and develops their love of reading. There is a good deal of thought put into the best ways of helping parents support their children in learning to read.
p.2
2
The mathematics curriculum is carefully planned, and it is ambitious. Children in the Reception classes have a daily input on the mathematics table as well as opportunities to develop their mathematical knowledge through a range of other activities. Teachers all have good subject knowledge and think carefully how to present mathematical ideas so that pupils will understand them. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are supported well. There is a real emphasis on teaching the correct vocabulary and pupils were heard correcting each other so that the right term was used. In key stage 1 there are termly assessments which are carefully analysed by leaders at school and trust level. However, leaders and teachers were less clear as to how teachers checked regularly to see if pupils had gaps in their knowledge or were finding a particular operation difficult.
p.2
2
The geography programme is also very well sequenced and benefits from being planned across both key stage 1 and 2. The plans identify the important knowledge and geographical vocabulary that pupils need to learn and when they need to learn it. Pupils in Year 2 were comparing physical and human features of a location in Kenya with their locality. This was well supported by using information technology so that they could see the places they were studying. What was less consistent was how teachers followed up the work pupils had completed to check that they were understanding it fully. The programme in the Reception classes prepares pupils for geography well. There are opportunities for children to explore maps, use directional language and explore rocks and fossils.
p.2
2
The personal development of pupils is a priority for leaders. There is a well-planned curriculum for personal, social and health education, supported by the assembly programme. Trips are used to enhance what pupils study, for example Year 2 pupils are visiting the Conisbrough Castle later in the month. The emphasis on pupils’ personal development also supports the positive behaviour of pupils, seen both in lessons and around the school. Reception Year children have already learned the routines and expectations that make Lound Infants such a positive place to learn.
p.2
2
Staff are proud to work at the school, which they say is well led by the headteacher. They say that they are well supported in managing their workload. The school moved to a new multi-academy trust in September 2021. The transition to the new trust has been handled well. The school now benefits from the support of the trust and an effective governing body. 3 November 2022
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
There is a strong culture of safeguarding. Leaders ensure that the correct procedures are followed when appointing staff. Thorough records are kept of any concerns. Prompt referrals are made if they are required. Action is taken in a timely manner. Staff receive regular training and understand their responsibilities in keeping pupils safe. Staff ensure that pupils know how to keep themselves safe. This work is well supported by the trust and governing body.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Assessment practice has not been developed fully in all subjects. This means that teachers do not always have useful information to enable them to identify gaps in knowledge and plan next steps in learning with precision so that pupils can all build their learning on knowledge which is secure. Leaders should ensure that assessment practice is developed that allows teachers to plan next steps in learning precisely, while being mindful of teachers’ workload.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour, or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.
p.3
Background
This is the first ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2017.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.3
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school. 3 November 2022
p.3
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 3 November 2022
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10240206 Type of school Infant
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection 23 – 24 May 2017, under section 5 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
The school joined the Steel City Schools Partnership in September 2021 A new chair of governors was appointed in September 2022. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspectors carried out deep dives in early reading, mathematics and geography. For each deep dive, the inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. The inspectors met with the headteacher, assistant headteachers, subject leaders and other members of staff. The lead inspector met with those responsible for governance, including the chair of the governing body and a governor, the chair of the trust and a trustee, and the chief executive of the trust. 3 November 2022
p.5
6
The inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons, at breaktimes and at lunchtimes. The inspectors gathered pupils’ views from both formal and informal discussions. The inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including the school’s self- evaluation and improvement plan. The inspectors checked the school’s single central record, met with the school’s designated safeguarding lead, and reviewed safeguarding information. The inspectors met with parents and carers. They took account of the responses to Ofsted’s parent survey, Ofsted Parent View. The inspectors also took account of the responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.6
Inspection team
Andrew Cummings, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Dughall McCormick His Majesty’s Inspector 3 November 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion