Summary
Dave Gilkerson (lead), Anne Maingay, Deborah Mosley, Matthew Spoors, Michael Wilson, Sally Wicken
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Nov 2022
- Inspectors AI-checked
Anne Maingay, Dave Gilkerson, Deborah Mosley, Matthew Spoors, Michael Wilson, Sally Wicken
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NG4 4AA
- Name on report verified
Carlton le Willows Academy
- URN verified
136627
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentRequires improvement
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In some subjects, the curriculum is ambitious and well sequenced. p.2
- Leaders need to support all teachers to ensure there is a culture that promotes high expectations of all pupils’ behaviour, and that the school’s policy is consistently applied. 15 to 17 November 2022 p.4
- Many say that they feel safe and that they enjoy attending. p.2
- Governors and trustees need to ensure that they fully understand and fulfil their statutory responsibilities to assure themselves that they have rigorous and effective structures and processes in place. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not consistently have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour or apply the school’s behaviour policy. p.4
- Learning is sometimes disrupted by pupils’ poor behaviour. p.2
- Recently appointed senior leaders have identified significant weaknesses in the quality of the provision. p.2
- However, they have failed to recognise the urgency needed to help these pupils develop their reading skills. p.3
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, leaders do not have equally high expectations of what pupils should know in all subjects. p.2
- As a result, pupils are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they should be. p.3
- Leaders have identified the key knowledge that they want pupils to learn and when this should be learned, for example in art. p.2
- Consequently, pupils receive mixed messages about how they should behave. p.3
- Leaders need to ensure that all aspects of the curriculum are coherently planned and sequenced so that pupils can build their knowledge over time. p.4
- Leaders must ensure that these pupils are supported as swiftly as possible so that they become fluent readers and are better placed to succeed across all subjects. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families4
“Parents’ and carers’ views of the school vary.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,477
- about usual (typical 1552)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 53
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 6
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Carlton le Willows Academy Wood Lane, Gedling, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG4 4AA
p.1
Inspection dates: 15 to 17 November 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Inadequate Sixth-form provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
Previous inspection grade Good 15 to 17 November 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
The experiences of pupils at this school are inconsistent. Many say that they feel safe and that they enjoy attending. However, they also say that their education too often depends on the individual teachers that teach them.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
In lessons, many pupils work hard and want to do their best. However, teachers’ expectations of pupils’ behaviour and learning are not consistently high. Learning is sometimes disrupted by pupils’ poor behaviour. Some pupils are disrespectful to adults. Most pupils say that if bullying were to occur it would be dealt with effectively by staff.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders do not have high enough expectations of all pupils. This is particularly the case for pupils who are educated off site through remote learning and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Leaders do not ensure that pupils educated off site attend regularly, are safe and receive a good education.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Parents’ and carers’ views of the school vary. Some parents are disappointed that leaders are not providing enough support and challenge for some pupils to help meet their needs. Other parents are pleased with the outcomes their children achieve. They appreciate current leaders’ recent efforts to address their concerns about the school.
p.2
better?
The school has gone through a period of change. Recently appointed senior leaders have identified significant weaknesses in the quality of the provision.
p.2
better?
However, leaders have failed to create a culture of effective safeguarding. They do not have effective processes to check on, and support, those pupils who access their education away from the school site. Leaders do not keep accurate registers for these pupils. They are unsure exactly where some of these pupils are, or if they are accessing their provision. Leaders have not reviewed the provision for these pupils. As a result, some pupils have gained little education for considerable periods of time.
p.2
better?
Leaders have not ensured a consistent approach in the planning and delivery of the curriculum for all pupils, including students in the sixth form. In some subjects, the curriculum is ambitious and well sequenced. Leaders have identified the key knowledge that they want pupils to learn and when this should be learned, for example in art. However, leaders do not have equally high expectations of what pupils should know in all subjects. In other subjects, individual teachers determine the ambition of the curriculum. This leads to inconsistencies in the expectations leaders and teachers have of pupils, and in the suitably demanding work provided 15 to 17 November 2022
p.2
3
for them. Some teachers do not use assessment information well enough to identify pupils’ misconceptions. As a result, some pupils develop gaps in their knowledge.
p.3
3
Leaders are not ambitious for all pupils with SEND. The support for these pupils is not always precise enough to enable them to acquire the knowledge and skills that they are entitled to. As a result, these pupils do not achieve as well as they could.
p.3
3
Leaders have not ensured that there is an effective programme in place to support those pupils who need help to read well. They have developed some initial plans to address this issue. However, they have failed to recognise the urgency needed to help these pupils develop their reading skills. As a result, these pupils are falling further behind their peers. Some struggle to access aspects of the school’s curriculum due to their underdeveloped reading skills.
p.3
3
Most pupils behave well. However, teachers apply the behaviour policy inconsistently. Consequently, pupils receive mixed messages about how they should behave. Truancy from lessons occurs daily. The behaviour of some pupils in corridors and between lessons is causing worry for some other pupils. Some pupils do not display respectful attitudes towards other pupils, staff and visitors.
p.3
3
Most students enjoy their experience of the sixth form. They get on well with staff and with each other. Students benefit from their teachers’ subject knowledge and from the wide range of courses on offer.
p.3
3
However, leaders have not thought carefully enough about pupils’ personal development, including for students in the sixth form. Pupils do not gain enough knowledge about British values, the protected characteristics and cultural and religious diversity. As a result, pupils are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they should be. Leaders ensure that pupils receive appropriate careers guidance across all key stages. In this sense, pupils are well prepared for their next steps in employment, training or education. Pupils benefit from a range of extra- curricular activities.
p.3
3
Trustees and governors do not currently have an accurate view of the school. They are starting to get an understanding of its strengths and weaknesses.
p.3
3
Staff enjoy working at the school. They appreciate leaders’ efforts to improve their well-being.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders, including governors and trustees, have not acted swiftly to ensure that all pupils are safe. They do not accurately check the attendance of pupils who are educated off site. Consequently, they do not know if or when these pupils attend. Leaders are not assured of these pupils’ welfare. 15 to 17 November 2022
p.3
4
Leaders do not have effective systems to ensure the whereabouts of all pupils and students during the school day. Some pupils truant their lessons.
p.4
4
Leaders understand local risks. Pupils learn about how to keep themselves safe, including when online. Leaders work well with external agencies. Staff know how to report any concerns they have.
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Leaders do not accurately monitor the attendance of pupils who are educated off site or of students in the sixth form. Consequently, they do not know if or when these pupils attend. Leaders are not assured of these pupils’ welfare. Leaders should ensure that all systems and procedures are applied accurately and precisely to assure themselves of the whereabouts and safety of all pupils. Governors and trustees have not consistently met their statutory responsibilities nor provided a level of rigorous accountability for leaders. Statutory duties regarding safeguarding have not been fulfilled. As a result, not all aspects of the schools’ provision are of the highest quality. Governors and trustees need to ensure that they fully understand and fulfil their statutory responsibilities to assure themselves that they have rigorous and effective structures and processes in place. Leaders have not ensured that there is a well-planned and sequenced curriculum
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
in place for all subjects. This means that pupils do not always learn the important knowledge they need at the right time. Leaders need to ensure that all aspects of the curriculum are coherently planned and sequenced so that pupils can build their knowledge over time. Weaker readers are not supported well enough to access the wider curriculum. They find it hard to keep up and develop gaps in their knowledge as a result. Leaders must ensure that these pupils are supported as swiftly as possible so that they become fluent readers and are better placed to succeed across all subjects. Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum is ambitious and is designed to give all pupils, particularly those with SEND, the knowledge and cultural capital they need to succeed in life. Some pupils who are educated off site experience a very limited curriculum offer. Leaders need to ensure all pupils benefit from an
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
ambitious curriculum that prepares them well for their next steps in education, training or employment. Staff do not consistently have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour or apply the school’s behaviour policy. This hinders the creation of a respectful and purposeful learning environment. Leaders need to support all teachers to ensure there is a culture that promotes high expectations of all pupils’ behaviour, and that the school’s policy is consistently applied. 15 to 17 November 2022
p.4
5
Pupils are not as well equipped for life in modern Britain as they could be. Pupils do not all fully appreciate the differences and similarities between cultures and religions. Leaders have not ensured religious education has been provided in accordance with statutory requirements. Additionally, not all pupils understand British values or how specific characteristics are protected by law. Leaders need to ensure that all aspects of the personal development programme prepares all pupils well for life in modern Britain.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.5
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.5
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.5
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 15 to 17 November 2022
p.5
School details
Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council
p.6
School details
Inspection number 10240853 Type of school Secondary comprehensive
p.6
provision
Number of pupils on the school roll 1771
p.6
sixth form
Date of previous inspection 27 June 2017 under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.6
Information about this school
The school is part of the Greater Nottingham Education Trust. Mr Rod Bond-Taylor is currently the acting headteacher. There were a number of appointments made to the leadership team in September 2022. The school uses the services of seven alternative providers, four of which are unregistered. The school also uses a home-based online learning platform for 27 of its pupils, some of whom attend the school on a part-time basis. The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause. This means that pupils in Years 8 to 13 receive information about the full range of education options available to them. This includes opportunities for a range of education and training providers to speak to pupils about technical education qualifications and apprenticeships. 15 to 17 November 2022
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We deemed the inspection a graded (section 5) inspection under the same Act.
p.7
Information about this inspection
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. The inspection was deemed to be a graded inspection by the lead Ofsted Inspector at the end of the first day. The inspection was then led by one of His Majesty’s Inspectors for the remaining days. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders, curriculum leaders, the special educational needs coordinator and a range of staff. The lead inspector met with two trustees, one of which was the acting chief executive and representatives from the governing body including the chair. Inspectors carried out deep dives in English, mathematics, history, modern foreign languages and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers,
p.7
Information about this inspection
spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also looked at the curriculum plans for art and geography and visited some lessons. Inspectors visited a range of lessons in the sixth form. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at other times around school. Inspectors considered a wide variety of school documents, including the school self-evaluation and school development plan. Inspectors took account of the responses received on Ofsted’s Parent View and considered the results of Ofsted’s surveys for staff and pupils. In addition, inspectors met with small groups of pupils to gather their views. To judge the effectiveness of safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the school’s relevant policies, scrutinised the single central record, checked the school’s procedures for the safe recruitment of staff and met with members of the school’s safeguarding team. Inspectors also spoke with other staff and pupils about
p.7
Inspection team
Dave Gilkerson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector 15 to 17 November 2022
p.7
8
Sally Wicken, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.8
8
Matthew Spoors Ofsted Inspector 15 to 17 November 2022
p.8
9
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.9
9
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
9
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
9
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
9
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion