Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Setting
Summary
Rob Hackfath (lead), Claire Price
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Claire Price, Rob Hackfath
- Postcode verified
ST13 6EU
- Name on report verified
Leek High School This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Too many lessons are disturbed by low-level disruption, and teachers do not tackle this consistently. p.2
- This means that pupils do not benefit from consistently high expectations of their behaviour. p.2
- For example, leaders and those responsible for governance have not made sure that plans to address poor behaviour are p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You value all of this support and we agreed that it continues to be something that the school very much needs to help it to move forward. p.3
- Subject leaders are starting to identify the important knowledge that pupils need to learn and are beginning to sequence this well. p.2
- Members of the IEB know the school well and are clear about the next steps that you need to take and the barriers that you are facing. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development6
“This has led to some gaps in policies and training.” p.2Records & policies3
“This has led to some gaps in policies and training.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,182
- shorter than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Steven Fryer Interim Executive Headteacher Leek High School Springfield Road Leek Staffordshire ST13 6EU
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Leek High School
This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 9 and 10 November 2022, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require special measures following the graded (section 5) inspection that took place in March 2022.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Leek High School
During the inspection, Rob Hackfath, His Majesty’s Inspector (HMI), and I discussed with you and other senior leaders, the CEO of the multi-academy trust, trustees and members of the interim executive board (IEB) the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also met staff and reviewed school policies and documents, including safeguarding records and the school’s website. We spoke to pupils, visited lessons and visited the school’s isolation room. I also considered the views of parents and staff expressed through Ofsted Parent View and the staff survey. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.
p.1
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Since the previous inspection, there have been significant changes to the school’s leadership. You were appointed as interim executive headteacher in May 2022, and an IEB was appointed to replace the local governing body at the same time. The trust has seconded a deputy headteacher from another trust, and an assistant headteacher from a school in the trust also works for one day a week at your school.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Leaders have developed an appropriate plan for improving the school. The trust acted swiftly to tackle some of the immediate shortcomings. They appointed well-qualified and experienced school leaders to sit on the IEB. Members of the IEB know the school well and are clear about the next steps that you need to take and the barriers that you are facing. The trust also secured support from leaders in another trust. However, there is sometimes conflict between the actions that leaders are taking and the advice and challenge received from other sources. This means that school leaders do not always focus well enough on tackling the most important issues that the school is experiencing. Leaders do not implement the action plan consistently and effectively and governors have not held leaders to account for this sufficiently well. For example, leaders and those responsible for governance have not made sure that plans to address poor behaviour are
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
working as well as they should. As a result, too much of leaders’ time is spent dealing with day-to-day behaviour issues, and this is preventing other areas of the school’s work from being successful.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Pupils’ behaviour in lessons frequently disrupts the learning of others. You have introduced a behaviour system that focuses on simple rules for pupils to follow. You report that when this was first introduced, behaviour improved. However, these improvements have not been sustained. Too many lessons are disturbed by low-level disruption, and teachers do not tackle this consistently. Leaders have not ensured that all staff have the right training to help them to implement the new policy. This means that pupils do not benefit from consistently high expectations of their behaviour. There is not a staged approach in place to manage behaviour. As a result, the number of suspensions remains too high. Leaders have not monitored the new behaviour system well enough, and this has prevented you from taking the right actions to improve pupils’ behaviour.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
You rightly prioritised safeguarding following the last inspection and you have ensured that safeguarding is effective. You made sure that pre-employment checks for new staff are in place, and you ensure that these are recorded appropriately. You recognised that staff required further training and provided this for all staff at the beginning of the school year. Staff are clear about the risks that pupils may face and are vigilant in identifying and recording concerns about pupils. Leaders are knowledgeable about their pupils and pass on the concerns that they have about them. However, leaders and those responsible for governance do not have sufficient oversight of all areas of safeguarding. This has led to some gaps in policies and training.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
You have begun work on building an effective curriculum. Subject leaders from Leek High School work with the local middle school to make sure that the curriculum builds effectively from Year 8 into Year 9. Subject leaders are starting to identify the important knowledge that pupils need to learn and are beginning to sequence this well. This work is still in its early stages and there is still more work to do. Leaders have focused on introducing a common structure for lessons in the school. They have not yet thought about how to make sure that all teachers build their understanding of how to teach their subjects well. You have introduced an assessment strategy for all subjects to follow, but this is not yet sufficiently matched with the curriculum development work that is happening.
p.2
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Leaders have devised plans for improving the learning of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). The newly introduced pupil passports are designed to provide teachers with information about how to support pupils with SEND most effectively. However, these documents are not detailed enough, and teachers do not receive appropriate training to help them meet pupils’ needs. Leaders know this and have plans to address it.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
Leaders have begun work on creating a culture of reading in the school. A structured reading programme has been introduced, and there is a tutor reading programme. Some pupils do not experience high-quality reading in tutor time, however, and leaders have not monitored this well enough. Pupils who do not yet read fluently do not receive the help that that they need.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
You have decided to strengthen existing systems and processes to improve attendance. Leaders are beginning to scrutinise the data more thoroughly and this is helping them to direct their attentions more effectively. Leaders are not yet analytical enough about what is and is not working in terms of attendance, which limits the effectiveness of the actions they are taking to try to improve it.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
You have identified the recruitment and retention of staff as an issue for the school. The chair of the IEB is mindful of the workload and well-being of staff at the school and these are being monitored regularly.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
You are receiving support from the CEO of a local trust and from the local authority safeguarding leader. You value all of this support and we agreed that it continues to be something that the school very much needs to help it to move forward.
p.3
The progress made towards the removal of special measures
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the Talentum Learning Trust, the Department for Education’s regional director and the director of children’s services for Staffordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website. Yours sincerely
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion