Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Blessed Thomas Holford Catholic College

Inspected 5 Oct 2022 · published 10 Jan 2023 · URN 106376

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Oct 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Veitch, Emma Gregory, Lindy Griffiths, Michael Pennington, Tim Long

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WA15 8HT

  • Name on report verified

    Blessed Thomas Holford Catholic College

  • URN verified

    106376

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousconsistentlyeffectiveeffectivelyoutstandingpositiveenjoyenjoyment
Criticismconcernsnot alwaysvariableunevenweakpoornot consistentlynot high expectations

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1489w+22
  • Safeguarding125w+1
  • What needs to improve115w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,695
longer than usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
26%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Inspection of Blessed Thomas Holford Catholic College Urban Road, Altrincham, Cheshire WA15 8HT

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Requires improvement Sixth-form provision Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

This school was last inspected nine years ago and was judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time.

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 4 and 5 October 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Staff do not have consistently high expectations of what pupils can and should achieve in Years 7 to 11. Pupils do not benefit from a sufficiently ambitious curriculum. The wider personal development curriculum on offer to pupils is also variable in quality. As a result, pupils’ academic progress and the quality of their personal development are uneven and sometimes weak in key stages 3 and 4.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Conversely, students in the sixth form benefit from an effective education across a broad range of subjects. They achieve well. Students experience an age-appropriate personal development programme. They behave consistently well and show positive attitudes to their learning. Students said that they enjoy attending the sixth form.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

The quality of pupils’ behaviour in Years 7 to 11 varies. While the majority of pupils behave well, a persistent minority spoil the experiences of others. Some of these pupils disrupt lessons and struggle to regulate their behaviour around school. Pupils said staff do not manage behaviour consistently well.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils said that some pupils call others inappropriate names. Less frequently, pupils experience more unpleasant behaviours such as bullying. Pupils felt that staff handle these incidents well if they are reported. However, some pupils are less willing to report concerns about poor behaviour, including bullying.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Most pupils feel that staff are approachable. However, some pupils are frustrated with the quality of education that they receive. This affects what they want to study in the next stage of their education. Nevertheless, pupils value the range of extra- curricular activities on offer. They particularly appreciate supporting local and national charities.

p.2

better?

Until very recently, leaders and governors have not fully understood the weaknesses in the quality of education and the wider personal development experiences that pupils receive. Over time, leaders and governors have not evaluated some aspects of pupils’ lived experiences of school life in sufficient depth. For example, they only have a partial understanding of the support that staff need to improve pupils’ learning experiences and the quality of their behaviour. While leaders and governors are starting to address some of these concerns, it is too early to see the impact of their actions.

p.2

better?

Leaders ensure that pupils study a sufficiently broad range of subjects in key stages 3 and 4. However, the quality of pupils’ learning experiences varies widely across subjects. This is because, over time, the overall design of the curriculum at subject level has lacked ambition in some curriculum areas. Some pupils have not been exposed to the depth of subject content that they require to develop a rich body of knowledge. This has resulted in pupils missing out on key learning experiences. 4 and 5 October 2022

p.2

3

In some curriculum areas, leaders have not ensured that essential subject content is delivered in a logical order. This has hampered some pupils’ enjoyment of these subjects, and it has adversely affected some pupils’ achievement. Leaders have begun to support staff in these subjects to design and deliver suitably ambitious curriculums to pupils in Years 7 to 11. However, these much-needed improvements are in their early stages of development. Consequently, it is too early to see the impact that they are having on pupils’ learning and development.

p.3

3

In contrast, in some other curriculum areas, teachers use their subject knowledge to deliver topics and concepts well. They provide helpful activities for pupils to learn and use new knowledge. Pupils said that they value these learning experiences in these subjects.

p.3

3

Some teachers make effective use of leaders’ assessment systems to identify what pupils know, remember and can do. However, some staff do not assess subject matter as effectively as they should. That said, leaders are now taking effective action to improve their assessment systems.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure that pupils and students with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) learn the same subject content as their peers. Leaders accurately identify the needs of these pupils. In the main, teachers use this information carefully to provide helpful support to these pupils in lessons.

p.3

3

The uneven experiences of pupils mean that they do not make equal gains in what they know and remember across the subjects that they study. This includes disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND.

p.3

3

Leaders carefully identify the needs of pupils who are at the earliest stages of learning to read. They provide well-matched support to help these pupils successfully strengthen their reading knowledge. Staff are encouraging and supporting pupils and students of all ages to read more widely and often.

p.3

3

Students in the sixth form benefit from a broad and balanced range of academic and vocational subjects. These meet their learning needs well. Subject curriculums are carefully designed around the knowledge that students need to succeed. Teachers deliver the curriculum effectively in the sixth form. They ensure that students confidently recall and use the knowledge that they are taught in a range of different contexts.

p.3

3

Leaders’ expectations of behaviour are not understood by all staff. Staff do not always apply the school’s behaviour systems consistently well. Leaders’ checks on pupils’ behaviour do not give them a clear enough insight into the deterioration of some pupils’ conduct.

p.3

3

Pupils in Years 7 to 11 cannot always recall what they have previously learned about some important aspects of the personal development curriculum. Suitably trained staff expertly design and deliver some aspects of pupils’ personal development, such as relationships and sex education. However, other important areas, for example 4 and 5 October 2022

p.3

4

personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education, are not delivered as well. Pupils’ experiences of PSHE are often disjointed. Many staff lack the knowledge or skills to deliver this content as effectively as they should.

p.4

4

Pupils get a wide range of careers education, information, advice and guidance (CEIAG) to help them think about their futures. Students in the sixth form spoke highly of the carefully focused CEIAG opportunities that they get. However, these experiences have a mixed impact on the wider development of pupils in key stages 3 and 4. Some pupils in Years 8 to 11 are often unable to articulate how these opportunities have helped them to make choices about their next steps in education, employment or training.

p.4

4

Teachers value the support that leaders and governors give to them. They said that leaders and governors listen to the experiences of staff. Most staff appreciate what leaders and governors do to make a positive contribution to their workload and well- being.

p.4

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders have a secure understanding of the safeguarding risks that pupils and students sometimes face. They ensure that pupils are well educated about these potential risks.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders successfully train staff so that they are confident to look out for pupils’ and students’ welfare and well-being. Staff understand what to do if they have concerns about a pupil. They are vigilant and report concerns in a timely and appropriate manner.

p.4

Safeguarding

Leaders carefully consider and act on the potential concerns that staff share about pupils. They make use of a range of internal and external expertise to support pupils and students. They regularly review and adapt the help that pupils receive to ensure that the support they offer is working well.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 For some time, pupils in Years 7 to 11 have not benefitted from an appropriately ambitious, carefully sequenced and well-delivered curriculum in a range of subjects. This has impeded how well pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and some pupils with SEND, achieve in these subjects. It has also affected their enjoyment of these subjects and their desire to study them further. Leaders and governors should continue to provide subject leaders and staff with the support they need to design, deliver and embed suitably ambitious curriculums across all subjects. 4 and 5 October 2022

p.4

5

 Some pupils do not behave as well as they should. Around school, some pupils are often boisterous and use unpleasant language. A small number of pupils do not show the respect to others that they should. This affects how well some pupils enjoy and engage in school. Leaders should ensure that all pupils understand the behaviour that is expected from them. They should ensure that pupils are consistently challenged and supported to behave as well as they should.  Leaders have not ensured that pupils in key stages 3 and 4 benefit from a coherently planned and consistently high-quality personal development programme. This includes CEIAG. Consequently, pupils’ wider personal development experiences are disjointed and often of variable quality. Leaders should act to ensure that all aspects of pupils’ personal development are carefully designed. They should ensure that all staff access the support and training they

p.5

5

need to deliver these programmes consistently well.  Leaders’ and governors’ understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses are not always informed by a suitably broad range of information. This means that they do not have a sufficiently comprehensive understanding of the quality of education that pupils receive or how well pupils behave. Leaders and governors should evaluate more thoroughly all aspects of the experiences that pupils receive and act on the findings.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 4 and 5 October 2022

p.5

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,555

p.6

sixth form

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

Headteacher

Lee Fishwick and Emma Taylor (Co- headteachers) Website www.bthcc.org.uk

p.6

Headteacher

Date of previous inspection 19 and 20 June 2013

p.6

Information about this school

 Blessed Thomas Holford Catholic College is maintained by Trafford local authority.  The school is a voluntary-aided faith school. It is part of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Shrewsbury. The school’s last section 48 inspection took place in May 2019.  There are a small proportion of pupils and students with SEND in the sixth form. Some of these pupils have education, health and care plans to support a wide range of learning and/or physical needs.  The school makes use of six alternative provisions to provide full- and part-time education for 12 pupils. This includes the use of four registered and two unregistered providers.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships . 4 and 5 October 2022

p.6

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the interim co-headteachers and other senior leaders. They met with representatives of the governing body, the local authority and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Shrewsbury.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: English, mathematics, science, humanities and modern foreign languages. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors looked at how the curriculum is delivered in some other subjects.  Inspectors reviewed the school’s records of safeguarding checks and referrals. They met with the leaders who have overall responsibility for safeguarding.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors spoke with staff and pupils about the leaders’ work to keep pupils safe.  Inspectors spoke with the leaders responsible for SEND and reading. They also looked at information about the support for pupils who have additional needs.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in class and around the school site. They also scrutinised behaviour and attendance records.  Inspectors spoke with pupils from all year groups and considered the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for pupils.  Inspectors held discussions with staff and considered the responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for staff.  Inspectors took account of the responses to the online questionnaire, Ofsted Parent View, including the comments received through Ofsted’s free-text facility. Inspectors also considered the views of parents who contacted them during the inspection.

p.7

Inspection team

Michael Pennington, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Tim Long Ofsted Inspector 4 and 5 October 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion