Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

The Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School

Inspected 8 Nov 2022 · published 10 Jan 2023 · URN 107607

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP517591

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne-Marie Giffts-Walker

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    SE24 9HU

  • Name on report verified

    The Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School

  • URN verified

    107607

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−73Very criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisesafewarmenjoypositiverobusteffectiveconsiderateaccurate
Criticismnot effectiveweakbreachesconcernsrisk of harmcompromisedfailedweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings734w−76
  • Safeguarding233w−48

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
937
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 1
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 16%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of The Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School Herne Hill Baptist Church, Half Moon Lane, Herne Hill, London SE24 9HU

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Weak management of the pre-school by the committee and frequent changes to the management team result in breaches of the welfare requirements. These breaches have a significant, negative impact on the quality of care and education that children receive. Children's welfare is further compromised, as the committee does not demonstrate sufficient understanding of their role and responsibility to meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage. The provider lacks knowledge and understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities. This puts children at significant risk of harm.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The provider has failed to notify Ofsted when there has been a change to committee members. This means that Ofsted has been unable to complete appropriate suitability checks to ensure that those with access to information about children and the running of the pre-school are suitable to do so. Furthermore, the provider has not informed Ofsted of changes to details of existing committee members. Risk assessments do not consistently help to identify and minimise hazards. For instance, some areas of the pre-school that are dangerous for children are accessible to them. This demonstrates that risk assessments are not effective in reducing risks to children. Children are not taught how to keep safe.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

The curriculum is not ambitious. The managers do not ensure that children receive stimulating learning experiences in all areas of the pre-school. This has a negative impact on children's next steps in education.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Despite the weaknesses in practice, children develop warm relationships with staff. They enjoy listening to stories read by staff. Children are friendly towards each other. For example, they are considerate to their friends. Overall, children behave well.

p.2

need to do better?

n The provider does not have appropriate knowledge and understanding of the correct process to follow when there are new committee members or there is a change in the details of existing committee members. This compromises children's safety. n The provider fails to keep accurate records about staff vetting procedures. There are missing details relating to Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks. It is not apparent if checks are obtained and by whom. This gives an incomplete picture of staff recruitment and of whether the process is thorough enough to ensure children are protected. n Staff do not have a proactive approach to establishing what may pose a risk to children's safety. For example, the kitchen door is left open, and there is an

p.2

need to do better?

8 November 2022 open toolbox with a claw hammer and nails. This demonstrates that risk assessments are not effective. In addition, children are not taught how to keep safe. This has a negative impact on their quality of education. n The quality of education is weak. The new management team has not put in place a meaningful curriculum that considers children's interests. Staff fail to build on what children already know and can do. They do not foster a love of reading. For instance, due to very disorganised resources, children cannot reach and access books independently. This is having a poor impact on children's learning and how they obtain knowledge, which has a negative impact on school readiness. n The provider does not take responsibility for staff training; consequently, children's behaviour is not always managed positively. This has a negative impact on children's well-being. n Staff have not set time aside to resource the outdoor areas to make them a

p.2

need to do better?

stimulating place for children to learn and have fun. The pre-school routine does not give children daily experiences in the outdoor area. This has a negative impact on children's quality of education outside. n Staff help children to develop their small and large muscles. For example, children self-select mark-making tools and paint and use materials to make simple collages. They have opportunities to use balancing apparatus indoors. This has a positive impact on their physical skills. n Parents comment that their children like to attend the setting. They appreciate the new manager and report that she is courteous and professional. However, parents also comment that they feel the communication from the pre-school could improve. Parents do not receive regular information about their children's individual learning. As a result, parents do not know fully how they can support their children's learning at home.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The provider and the managers do not understand and follow their own safeguarding policy and procedures. This includes for reporting safeguarding concerns and how to share these concerns with other agencies without delay. This significantly affects children's safety and places them at risk of harm. The procedures around managing allegations against staff are not securely understood, or followed, by the designated safeguarding leads. However, staff do understand some safeguarding issues, such as 'Prevent' duty.

p.3

Due date

ensure Ofsted are notified of the action taken in respect of allegations, within 14 days of the allegations being made 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

obtain an enhanced DBS check in respect of every person aged 16 and over who works directly with children 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

improve on risk assessments to ensure children are not exposed to risks 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure children's behaviours are managed in appropriate ways. 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure robust procedures are in place to provide Ofsted with all necessary information about new committee members so that essential suitability checks can be carried out 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure that staff are able to recognise and respond to children's interests in their play 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure children have planned daily access to a stimulating outdoor area 02/12/2022

p.4

Due date

improve arrangements to ensure parental partnership is effective so that all parents receive up-to-date details regarding the setting, information about their children's next steps and how they can support their learning at home. 02/12/2022

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 107607 Local authority Southwark Inspection number 10258960 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 7

p.5

Name of registered person

Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 07866620994 Date of previous inspection 21 September 2018

p.5

Information about this early years setting

The Mustard Seed Christian Pre-School registered in 1997. It is located in Herne Hill, in the London Borough of Southwark. It operates from rooms that are part of Herne Hill Baptist Church. The group opens for five sessions each week, Monday to Friday, from 9am to 3pm, during term time. There are four staff who work with children, three of whom hold relevant early years qualifications. The pre-school provides funded free early education for children aged two, three and four years.

p.5

Inspection activities

n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The manager and the inspector completed a learning walk together of all the areas of the nursery and discussed the early years curriculum. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The manager and the inspector completed a joint observation of an activity together. n The inspector reviewed documentation relevant to the inspection process.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

8 November 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion