Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Autumn House

Inspected 16 Nov 2022 · URN 1256770

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    U5 Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Marie Cordingley

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Autumn House

  • URN verified

    1256770

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveclearpositivewell-plannedsafestrongstrengthssensitive
Criticismconcernserrorsnot alwaysnot consistentlyinconsistentlimitedlownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings887w+11
  • What needs to improve330w+71

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,212
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 43
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%What needs to improve 21%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 1 Autumn House

p.1

Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This residential family centre is registered to provide support for up to three families at any one time. The centre is privately owned.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

Families access the centre at the direction of the family court or the local authority for the purpose of assessment. Parenting assessments are usually completed over a 12-week period, but may be extended if agreed with the local authority or following court instruction.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The manager registered with Ofsted in April 2022.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

There were two families living at the centre at the time of the inspection.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 20 February 2019

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families are welcomed to the centre in a sensitive way. They are helped to understand expectations and how the assessment process works. One parent described how staff encouraged her to ask questions and share her concerns when she arrived.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Placement plans are highly personalised. Families receive well-planned support, which is tailored in accordance with their individual needs. The regular review of families’ placement plans helps to support their ongoing progress.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families benefit from structured and positive routines. Staff work closely with parents to help them to develop their skills and confidence. Families have positive experiences at the centre, and are encouraged to take part in a range of activities that are designed to develop their knowledge, skills and confidence.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Staff tend to manage people’s medication. There is not always enough consideration as to how parents can be supported to develop their skills and confidence in this area. Furthermore, recent errors by staff mean that medication administration records are not consistently clear.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parenting assessments are carried out by a qualified social worker. Families are encouraged to participate meaningfully, and staff take time to ensure that families are clear about the progress of their assessments. Assessments are of good quality, evidence based and include clear recommendations.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families say that they feel able to express their views. Residents’ meetings capture people’s views, wishes and feelings well. However, information about actions taken in response to people’s feedback is limited. Strengthening this area will help to ensure that parents are reassured that their views are heard and acted on.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

All staff receive training in safeguarding and have a good understanding of the action they should take if concerns are identified. Parents benefit from training and education in a range of areas that support children’s safety, such as childhood illnesses and first aid.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Staff are vigilant and there are clear monitoring arrangements in place, which are individually assessed for each parent and regularly reviewed. This helps to ensure that there is a suitable balance between safety and people’s privacy. It is recommended that the centre’s CCTV policy is reviewed to ensure it supports developing practice. Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 3 Risks to people’s safety and well-being are clearly identified. There are well-detailed risk management plans, which include clear guidance and strategies to support families safely. Good-quality direct work helps parents to develop their understanding of personal safety and supports them to make safer choices.

p.2

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

There are clear expectations and boundaries. Staff manage conflict and any challenging situations well. Relationships between families are closely monitored and action quickly taken if there are any concerns. This helps to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for families.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

There are suitable procedures in place to ensure that all areas of the home are well maintained and free from hazards. Safer recruitment procedures are carefully followed. This helps to ensure that families are not exposed to staff who are of unsuitable character.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is a manager in post who registered with Ofsted in April 2022. The manager is a registered social worker who has extensive experience in social care. She demonstrates a strong vison for the service and a commitment to high standards of assessment, support and safety.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Good-quality professional relationships help to ensure that families benefit from well- planned, holistic support. The manager works closely with a range of external partners to ensure the best outcomes for parents and children.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff turnover is low. This means that families benefit from consistency and receive support from a stable staff team. There is a good range of skills across the staff team, which includes three social workers, staff with early years experience and staff qualified in working with children in residential services.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is a well-detailed workforce development plan in place, which is regularly reviewed. A range of mandatory learning and training related to families’ individual needs, supports the staff team’s skills and knowledge.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There is a positive approach to supervision, and staff describe a culture of reflective practice. Effective arrangements are in place, including a programme for the professional supervision of social workers. Better use could be made of the supervision process when addressing performance issues, such as medication errors.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The manager makes effective use of internal monitoring, which enables her to identify and act on shortfalls. However, the overall evaluation of families’ experiences and outcomes could be more effective to provide a clearer picture of the service’s strengths and areas of practice that would benefit from development.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Reports submitted under regulation 25 vary in quality. They tend to describe parents’ needs rather than evaluating the standard of assessment, support and safety. Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 4 Furthermore, consultation with external professionals is inconsistent. This does not support the regulator or the manager in monitoring the service. Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 5

p.3

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that there is an effective policy on the safe management of medicines, which includes a written record of all medication, treatment and first aid given to parents and children during their placement. In particular, the policy should outline how parents should be supported to manage their own medication, where this is assessed as safe. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 12, paragraph 6.6)

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that parents are encouraged to communicate their views, wishes and feelings on all aspects of their placement, assessment and support and that staff take account of these views, wishes and feelings in the day-to-day running and development of the centre. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 9, paragraph 2.1)

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that there is a clear and effective policy on the use of surveillance in parenting assessments. The policy sets out how the techniques will be used to contribute to assessments, how families will be informed of their use for their circumstances, how legitimate privacy will be protected and how residents will be protected from potential abuse of such measures. In particular, the service’s CCTV policy and procedures should be reviewed to ensure that these reflect developing practice. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 18, paragraph 10.1)

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that there are clear and effective procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the centre. Parents and children, of an appropriate age, are regularly involved in contributing to monitoring the operation of the centre page 29. In particular, the outcomes and experiences of each family who use the centre should be meaningfully evaluated. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 29, paragraph 19.1)

p.5

Recommendations

 The registered person should ensure that visits of the centre carried out under regulation 25 include an assessment of the balance of privacy and supervision of families at the centre. (Residential Family Centres National Minimum Standards, page 29, paragraph 19.5)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and parents using the social care common inspection framework. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 6

p.5

Inspector

Mrs Marie Cordingley, Social Care Inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Autumn House 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspector

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion