Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF)
Childminder in Staffordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Oct 2022
- Inspectors verified
Sarah Dukes
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
209695
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Behaviour and attitudesInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentInadequate
- Quality of educationInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This means that any gaps in learning are not identified quickly enough, and children are at risk of falling behind. p.2
- This poor behaviour is not managed well. p.2
- There are breaches of the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage'. p.2
- The curriculum is poorly designed and delivered. p.2
- The childminder does not use assessment effectively and children do not make good progress from their starting points. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 913
- about usual (typical 899)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 1
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Overall effectiveness Inadequate
The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Inadequate Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
The provision is inadequate
There are breaches of the 'Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage'. The childminder demonstrates a lack of understanding of her responsibility in regard to the safeguarding and welfare requirements. This includes child protection and safeguarding procedures. She does not demonstrate a clear understanding of her role in keeping children safe. There is no clear policy in place for reporting concerns. Children's care needs are not always met promptly.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
The childminder does not have a secure understanding of how children develop and learn. The curriculum is poorly designed and delivered. Activities are mainly adult-led and lack purpose, direction and challenge. The childminder does not use assessment effectively and children do not make good progress from their starting points. The childminder is unable to demonstrate that she has the necessary knowledge and skills to bring about improvements to her practice and outcomes for children.
p.2
The provision is inadequate
Children do not have enough opportunities to explore and play following their own interests. They are not motivated to learn and do not display positive attitudes towards their learning. They lose interest quickly and do not share toys. The childminder does not manage children's poor behaviour and aggression effectively. That said, children are beginning to build strong bonds with the childminder and her assistant. They show that they feel secure in their care. For example, the childminder responds warmly to children's requests for cuddles when they are tired or upset.
p.2
need to do better?
n Leadership and management are weak. The childminder's knowledge and understanding of safeguarding and child protection is poor. She does not demonstrate an understanding of her role as the designated safeguarding lead, and her safeguarding policy is ineffective. Therefore, children's safety cannot be assured. n The childminder's evaluation of her provision is poor, and she has not maintained the quality since her last inspection. She has not considered or identified professional development opportunities to help her improve the care and education she provides or to raise outcomes for children. n The childminder's interactions with children are limited. Children do not always know what is expected of them and demonstrate low levels of engagement. Children sometimes display aggression towards each other and adults. This poor behaviour is not managed well. That said, the assistant is proactive in engaging
p.2
need to do better?
with the children. n Children's personal care needs are not always met in a timely manner. For
p.2
need to do better?
6 October 2022 example, children are sometimes left in wet clothes if they dribble or spill something down them. This does not support children's physical and emotional health and well-being. That said, nappies are changed regularly, and children are taught to become more independent in some hygiene practices, such as washing their hands before eating. n Assessment arrangements are ineffective. The childminder is unaware of the requirement to complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years. In addition, she does not review children's progress effectively. This means that any gaps in learning are not identified quickly enough, and children are at risk of falling behind. Children's next steps for learning are not well- identified or coherently planned for. n The curriculum is not suitably challenging or ambitious. The childminder does not have a sufficient understanding of how children develop and learn. This lack
p.2
need to do better?
of understanding of what children already know and can do means that opportunities to extend learning are missed. Children do not receive a high- quality education because expectations are low, and activities do not motivate them to learn. n Parents and carers say that they are happy with the care the childminder provides. They say that their children go in happily and that they receive information about what the children have done each day.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
The childminder has a poor understanding of child protection and safeguarding. She fails to demonstrate an understanding of her role as the designated safeguarding lead and relies heavily on her assistant for advice around safeguarding and first aid. The childminder's safeguarding policy is ineffective and does not include some safeguarding procedures, such as contacting the local safeguarding partnership. This means children's safety and welfare cannot be assured. That said, she has attended recent safeguarding and paediatric first-aid training. The childminder and her assistant are both able to identify some possible indicators of abuse. The premises are secure, and all adults associated with the provision undergo appropriate checks to ensure they are suitable to have contact with children.
p.3
Due date
6 October 2022 ensure an effective policy and procedures to safeguard children, in line with the guidance and procedures for the local safeguarding partners, are in place 07/11/2022
p.3
Due date
improve knowledge and understanding of safeguarding practices and the role of the designated lead to ensure that any concerns about children's welfare are acted on in a timely and appropriate way 07/11/2022
p.4
Due date
undertake appropriate training and professional development opportunities to ensure they offer quality learning and development experiences for children that continually improve 07/11/2022
p.4
Due date
ensure that children's care needs are met effectively to support children's health and well-being 07/11/2022
p.4
Due date
have clear, consistent strategies for managing children's behaviour in an appropriate way 07/11/2022
p.4
Due date
gain knowledge and understanding of and implement progress checks for children aged between two and three years 02/01/2023
p.4
Due date
implement effective procedures for assessing children's learning and development and use this information to tailor learning experiences to meet individual children's needs 02/01/2023
p.4
Due date
improve quality of teaching and provide exciting, enjoyable experiences that motivate and challenge children, and take account of their individual needs, interests and levels of development 02/01/2023
p.4
Due date
develop an ambitious curriculum that builds on what children already know and can do. 02/01/2023
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 209695 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 10234334 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder
p.5
inspection
Total number of places 14 Number of children on roll 14 Date of previous inspection 15 December 2016
p.5
Information about this early years setting
The childminder registered in 2000 and lives in Wombourne, Staffordshire. She operates all year round, from 7.00am to 6pm on Monday to Friday, except for family holidays. The childminder has two assistants who she works with occasionally.
p.5
Inspection activities
n This was the first routine inspection the provider received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The inspector discussed the impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The childminder showed the inspector the premises and discussed how they ensure they are secure and suitable. n The childminder and the inspector discussed the childminder's intentions for children's learning. n The assistant spoke to the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector observed the interactions between the childminder, her assistant and the children. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided and assessed the impact this was having on children's learning. n Parents and carers shared their views of the setting with the inspector. n The childminder provided the inspector with a sample of key documentation on request.
p.6
Inspection activities
We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Inspection activities
6 October 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspection activities
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection activities
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
Inspection activities
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspection activities
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion