Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

University College London

Inspected 3 Nov 2022 · published 21 Dec 2022 · URN 133902

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mike Finn

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Nov 2022

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mike Finn

  • Postcode verified

    WC1E 6BT

  • Name on report verified

    University College London

  • URN verified

    133902

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellhigh-qualityeffectiveclearsupportivesafesecure
Criticismtoo fewconcernsnot consistentlynot alwaysnot sufficientlynot cleargapsstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,197
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

University College London Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Mike Finn, His Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Higher education institution

p.1

Address: Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Monitoring visit: University College London, 2 and 3 November 2022

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits’ and ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly publicly funded’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

University College London (UCL) is a large university based in the London Borough of Camden. It teaches a wide range of higher education programmes, including undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, as well as postgraduate degree apprenticeships. UCL offers apprenticeship programmes exclusively at level 7 to 183 apprentices on standards-based programmes. The largest standard taught is the clinical associate in psychology. They also teach the senior leader, chartered town planner, systems engineer and advanced clinical practitioner (ophthalmology) standards.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have developed an effective curriculum. They teach higher-level apprenticeships in areas where there are significant skills gaps, such as in ophthalmology where there are too few practitioners in the health service to meet growing patient demand.

p.2

Reasonable progress

After a period of leadership instability, university managers have recently appointed new leaders for the apprenticeship provision. These new leaders have developed clear plans on how to improve the provision further. They have recently started to provide more useful information to members of the governance board. As a result, governors are getting the information they need to challenge leaders effectively to make improvements.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that most apprentices receive their entitlement to training away from the workplace. As a result, apprentices get the time they need outside of work to learn the theory that underpins their jobs, for example through residential workshops. However, a few apprentices struggle with their workload. A few Monitoring visit: University College London, 2 and 3 November 2022 ophthalmology apprentices cover clinics at short notice which conflicts with the time they need to complete their training.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that apprentices work in appropriate senior roles that align well with the level 7 standards. Leaders check that apprentices will find the content challenging enough, based on what they already know and can do. As a result, apprentices develop substantial new knowledge.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders involve employers effectively in the design of the curriculum. For example, on the senior leader apprenticeship, lecturers and the main employer have worked together to develop a transformation module, as this is a critical area for the business. As a result, the curriculum prepares apprentices effectively for the workplace roles that they undertake.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders do not check standards of teaching effectively enough. As a result, they are not clear on which lecturers need to develop their teaching skills further. This means that staff’s development is not targeted to focus enough on individual lecturers’ specific areas for development.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that they sequence the curriculum logically. This helps apprentices to remember more of what they are taught. For example, ophthalmology apprentices start by learning about gross anatomy and physiology. As the apprenticeship progresses, they build on this by learning related complex topics such as understanding the layers of the retina.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Lecturers support apprentices to develop further their mathematics skills. For example, apprentices develop a good understanding of interpreting statistical data. As a result, apprentices’ confidence in reading scientific papers improves.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Lecturers are leading subject experts who are very well qualified in their specialist areas. They draw well on this expertise when explaining complex topics in lectures and seminars.

p.3

Reasonable progress

The quality of feedback that lecturers give apprentices on their assessed work is too variable and not consistently good. As a result, apprentices are not always sufficiently clear about how to improve the standard of academic assessments.

p.3

Reasonable progress

The standard of apprentices’ practical work is high. Most apprentices can apply relevant concepts to the context of their jobs. For example, chartered town planner apprentices understand how the street environment needs to be safe for the public when they consider planning projects. Monitoring visit: University College London, 2 and 3 November 2022 Apprentices meet regularly with their assessor and employer to review their progress. However, the targets apprentices are set in progress reviews are too broad. They are not helpful enough for apprentices, because they do not identify the steps they need to take to improve specific areas of knowledge, skills or behaviours.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices benefit from having access to a range of high-quality learning resources. Apprentices can also access a wide range of extra courses on the virtual learning platform. For example, apprentices can access courses on academic writing for dissertations and assessments. This supports apprentices to develop further their writing skills.

p.4

Reasonable progress

The vast majority of apprentices who start their apprenticeship stay on their programme until the end and go on to achieve their qualification.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have developed a supportive culture. Apprentices are able to access a wide range of support for their mental health, such as through employee assistance helplines and counselling. As a result, apprentices have access to services to improve their well-being.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders ensure that the designated safeguarding lead is well trained to undertake their role effectively. They also ensure that staff involved in the programme receive safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty training, so they know the steps they need to take if they become aware of safeguarding concerns.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have developed an appropriate safeguarding policy that applies to all degree apprentices. This contains information about what support is available to apprentices. There is clear guidance about how staff, apprentices or employers can raise concerns to the safeguarding team.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Staff provide learners with safeguarding information at induction. However, as this is not sufficiently repeated, too few apprentices remember what they covered in these sessions. Monitoring visit: University College London, 2 and 3 November 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Reasonable progress

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion