Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years compliance action

Childminder in Manchester

Inspected 15 Nov 2022 · published 16 Nov 2022 · URN EY443983

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Nov 2022

  • URN verified

    EY443983

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−54Criticalmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimproved
Criticisminadequaterisk of harmat risknot improvedconcernharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
616
longer than usual (typical 317)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 35
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Summary of outcome

All early years providers must meet the legal requirements in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage, which you can find at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework--2. If we find that a provider is not meeting the requirements, we can take action to ensure they put matters right.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 4 October 2022, we carried out an inspection and found the provider was not meeting some of these requirements. The overall effectiveness of the provision was judged to be inadequate. The inspection report sets out the actions that the provider was required to take to meet the requirements.

p.1

Summary of outcome

Following the inspection we served a welfare requirements notice. This is a legal notice that required the provider to take the actions below within the timescales set out.

p.1

Summary of outcome

The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure that all persons aged 16 years and over are known to Ofsted, in order for their suitability to be determined

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure risk assessments are effective in minimising hazards across the setting

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure children are provided with privacy while using the toilet

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure that used nappies are not left on the floor and are disposed of correctly

p.1

Summary of outcome

n ensure that the childminder understands the possible signs and indicators of abuse and knows the local safeguarding partnership referral procedure.

p.1

Summary of outcome

We suspended the providers registration on 5 October 2022, because we believed children may be at risk of harm. The provider had a right of appeal against the suspension. The provider may not provide childcare for which registration is required while a suspension is in place and may commit an offence if they do so.

p.1

Summary of outcome

On 11 November 2022, we carried out a regulatory visit. At this visit we found that the provider had met some of the safeguarding and welfare actions but not others. The provider had ensured that all persons aged 16 years and over are known to Ofsted, in order for their suitability to be determined. She had repaired the damaged toilet door to ensure children are provided with privacy while using the toilet. She had removed the used nappies and will ensure that they are disposed of correctly in future. However, the provider had not improved risk assessment procedures. She had not improved her understanding of the possible signs and indicators of abuse and was unaware of the local safeguarding partnership referral procedure.

p.1

Summary of outcome

Additionally, during the regulatory visit on 11 November 2022, we identified a new area of concern. This means the provider was not meeting other requirements as set out in the Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage.

p.2

Summary of outcome

We served a further welfare requirements notice.

p.2

Summary of outcome

The provider will be able to give parents further information about this.

p.2

Summary of outcome

n ensure risk assessments are effective in minimising hazards across the setting

p.2

Summary of outcome

n ensure that the childminder understands the possible signs and indicators of abuse and knows the local safeguarding partnership referral procedure

p.2

Summary of outcome

n ensure there is a first-aid box with appropriate contents available for use at all times.

p.2

Summary of outcome

On 8 December 2022, we carried out a further regulatory visit. At this visit we found that the provider has improved risk assessment, in order to identify and reduce hazards across the setting. The provider has completed child protection training and now understands the possible signs and symptoms of abuse and the local safeguarding partnership referral procedure. She has also purchased a first-aid box with appropriate contents.

p.2

Summary of outcome

We are satisfied the provider has met the safeguarding and welfare actions raised.

p.2

Summary of outcome

On 13 December 2022, we lifted the suspension because the provider took appropriate action to deal with the matter that led to the suspension. We are satisfied that the risk of harm to children has been removed.

p.2

Summary of outcome

The provider is still registered with Ofsted.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion