Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Frodingham Infant School

Inspected 2 Nov 2022 · URN 117748

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Alison Stephenson (lead), Matthew Harrington

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Nov 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Stephenson, Matthew Harrington

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Good

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development verified

    Requires improvement

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DN16 1ST

  • Name on report verified

    Frodingham Infant School

  • URN verified

    117748

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudesGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Personal developmentRequires improvement
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousoutstandingclearsafepositiveenjoyskilfullyeffective
Criticismnot clearpoorfailednot alwaysdisruptionharmincompletedo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1124w+20
  • Safeguarding135w−37
  • What needs to improve114w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,341
about usual (typical 1215)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 56
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 7%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Inspection of Frodingham Infant School Rowland Road, Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire DN16 1ST

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Requires improvement Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Good Previous inspection grade Outstanding

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

The school was last inspected 14 years ago and judged ‘Outstanding’ under a previous inspection framework. This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time. From then until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections. Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection. 1 and 2 November 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils at Frodingham Infant School take care of each other. Adults foster a positive and safe environment for pupils.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils understand the school’s behaviour policy and that they will go to the time-out square if they break the three rules: be responsible, keep safe, show respect. Most pupils think this is fair. Pupils tell an adult if they have a problem. Pupils know what bullying is and say that an adult will sort it out for them if it happens.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils’ challenging behaviour is managed with de-escalation techniques. These pupils have a pen portrait that outlines the ways adults can support them to manage their behaviour.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Children in early years enjoy a newly renovated indoor and outdoor space. Children can access a range of resources in the provision such as the construction, painting and busy fingers areas. Reception children have an opportunity to be a role model in the nursery room. They wear the ‘top explorer’ badge with pride.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders have high ambitions for pupils in English and mathematics, but this is not being achieved in the wider curriculum. This is because pupils from different year groups and with varying attainment levels access the same activity. Sometimes tasks are too easy for some pupils in these subjects and sometimes they are too hard.

p.2

better?

Leaders have created a two-year rolling programme of topics across the wider curriculum in key stage 1 to meet the needs of the mixed-age classes. However, leaders have not considered how the wider curriculum builds progressively on what pupils already know from Year 1 into Year 2. Subject leaders have not identified the small steps of learning linked to the knowledge and skills they want pupils to remember for each unit of the curriculum. This means it is not clear what the essential knowledge is pupils must remember. As a result, pupils cannot always recall what they have learned. Subject leaders have not had an opportunity to check that the intended curriculum and work are appropriate.

p.2

better?

Leaders have a system for gathering information on pupils’ progress. Leaders are still developing this to ensure that it gives them the right information to adapt and inform their curriculum thinking.

p.2

better?

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) have individual learning plans that include targets to meet their specific need. Staff support pupils to practise and achieve these targets. However, ambition for all is not clear in the work pupils produce in their books. For example, in the mixed-age classes, Years 1 and 2 pupils often complete the same task irrespective of their attainment level or year group. As a result, some pupils are not making the progress that they might. 1 and 2 November 2022

p.2

3

Leaders have recently introduced a new phonics scheme to help ensure that there is consistency from early years to Year 2. Teachers check the sounds pupils know every six weeks. They use this information to plan daily catch-up sessions. Pupils who speak English as an additional language have extra phonics sessions to help them rapidly catch up. Teachers read stories to pupils at least once a day. These books are age appropriate and chosen to develop language acquisition. Each classroom has a ‘magpie wall’ to display vocabulary from the storybooks that pupils can then use in their own writing.

p.3

3

The mathematics curriculum is sequenced. Pupils develop mathematical skills by revisiting concepts that build on prior learning. Teachers use their subject knowledge to skilfully question pupils. The use of apparatus enables pupils with SEND to grasp concepts at an early stage before developing their problem-solving skills.

p.3

3

In early years, adults plan and design an ambitious curriculum that engages children in stimulating learning activities. This helps to develop children’s independence and resilience. Adults establish clear routines which enable children to play cooperatively in the large indoor and outdoor spaces. Children in the early years are calm and quickly settle to learn. However, in key stage 1, when the activity is not well matched to the needs of the pupils, they become restless and fidgety, which disrupts the flow of learning.

p.3

3

Relationship and sex education (RSE) and health education is taught each summer term. This is part of the school’s personal, social and health education. Leaders have not followed the Department for Education (DfE) statutory guidance to ensure that the RSE curriculum meets the needs of the pupils. They have not consulted with parents to ensure policy and practice reflects the community they serve.

p.3

3

Governors hold leaders to account through their termly monitoring days. They require leaders to explain the impact of their actions. This ensures that there is challenge and support for leaders at all levels.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff have annual training on how to identify indicators of harm. Leaders recognise pupils with SEND or those who speak English as an additional language can have other vulnerabilities, often linked to communication. Leaders use pictures to help these pupils convey their worries.

p.3

Safeguarding

Records are kept of incidents such as poor behaviour or the use of inappropriate language. However, the records do not always show the follow-up actions leaders have taken in response to the incident. This means some records are incomplete and do not record the views of parents and pupils.

p.3

Safeguarding

Pupils are clear on how to stay safe when online. They know not to talk to strangers when they are playing a game on the internet as the stranger might trick them. 1 and 2 November 2022

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In the wider curriculum, leaders have not planned out the small steps of content pupils need to learn. Teachers are clear on the end points from the national curriculum, but they have not broken down the content into small enough steps for pupils to be successful. This means that pupils cannot remember some of the key knowledge they have been taught. Leaders should ensure that the sequences of learning in each subject are clear.  There is not enough ambition for all pupils in the mixed-age classes. Teachers do not ensure that each year group has work at their appropriate level. As a result, tasks can be too easy for some pupils and too hard for others. This can then lead to low-level disruption, as well as pupils not making the progress they could. Leaders should ensure that teachers prepare an ambitious curriculum for mixed- age groups.  Some subject leaders have not had an opportunity to monitor their subjects. This

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

hampers their ability to know if the intended curriculum and activities are being taught and how well pupils are learning their subject. Leaders should ensure subject leaders have time to effectively monitor their area of responsibility.  Leaders have failed to consult with parents on their RSE curriculum. Parents do not know what is being taught in RSE. Leaders should ensure that they consult with parents and use the statutory DfE guidance to inform the school’s policy.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 1 and 2 November 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Catherine McHale

p.5

School details

Website www.frodingham-infantschool.co.uk

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 6 and 7 November 2008

p.5

Information about this school

 This is an average-size school.  The percentage of pupils who receive pupil premium funding is higher than the national average.  The school does not use any alternative providers.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, curriculum leaders, staff and pupils. Meetings were also held with representatives from the local authority and the governing body.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, 1 and 2 November 2022

p.5

6

history and music. For each deep dive, inspectors met with curriculum leaders, spoke to pupils and teachers, visited lessons and looked at pupils’ work. Inspectors also looked at the curriculum structure for art.  Inspectors heard pupils read to a familiar adult.  Inspectors examined safeguarding records, attendance figures, curriculum plans and policies.  Inspectors considered the views of parents from the responses to Ofsted’s survey, Ofsted Parent View.  The views of staff were considered from meeting with them and from the responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire.  The views of pupils were considered from meetings with them.

p.6

Inspection team

Alison Stephenson, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Matthew Harrington His Majesty’s Inspector 1 and 2 November 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion