Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Park Hall Infant Academy
Summary
Kirsty Foulkes (lead), Darren Bishop, Emma Titchener
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Nov 2022
- Inspectors verified
Darren Bishop, Emma Titchener, Kirsty Foulkes
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WS5 3HF
- Name on report verified
Park Hall Infant Academy
- URN verified
136303
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationGood
66% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders’ vision is for all pupils to be successful, confident, enthusiastic, caring and happy. p.2
- They attain consistently strong outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics. p.2
- Staff are proud to work at the school and enjoy their job. p.2
- Staff in the early years are caring and nurturing. p.3
- Subject leaders need to identify the key building blocks of knowledge from Nursery to Year 2 so that teachers can deliver the intended curriculum in a structured, well-sequenced and consistent manner. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, not all subject leaders have given enough thought to the small building blocks of knowledge that need to be in place from Nursery through to Year 2. p.2
- Teaching, in a few subjects, does not enable pupils to remember important curriculum content as well as they need to. p.4
- The teaching of phonics is not enabling some lower-attaining pupils to progress as well as they should. p.4
- Their evaluation of what is working well and what needs to improve is accurate. p.2
- Leaders have set out an overview of what pupils should learn in all subjects and how teachers will check whether pupils have been successful. p.2
- Leaders should ensure that the teaching of phonics is effective and supports all pupils to read with good fluency. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance15
“Leaders’ vision is for all pupils to be successful, confident, enthusiastic, caring and happy.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,228
- about usual (typical 1098)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Park Hall Infant Academy Park Hall Road, Walsall, West Midlands WS5 3HF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
The quality of education Good Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Good Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Ofsted has not previously inspected Park Hall Infant Academy as an academy school under section 5 of the Education Act 2005 as, until November 2020, the school was exempted by law from routine inspection, so there has been a longer gap than usual between inspections.
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Judgements in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection of the predecessor school. 1 and 2 November 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders’ vision is for all pupils to be successful, confident, enthusiastic, caring and happy. This vision is a reality. Key stage 1 pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) achieve well in most subjects. They attain consistently strong outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
The youngest children in the early years seek out conversation. However, staff do not plan for, and seize enough, opportunities to promote and develop children’s language.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enjoy school. They are proud of the roles they hold, such as school councillors. Pupils know that their peers voted for them and that this is a fair system. Pupils understand that with roles come responsibilities. They are keen to do the job well and make a difference to their school.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils behave well and are safe. They know that bullying is not acceptable and that there are different types of bullying. Bullying is not tolerated, but if it does happen, pupils trust that an adult will sort it out. Pupils understand that ‘people who bully need help and may be sad too’. Pupils show the school values through their words and actions.
p.2
better?
Trustees have managed the recent changes of trust membership and school leadership well. Staff are proud to work at the school and enjoy their job. Leaders are considerate of staff’s workload and well-being. Parents and carers also value the way recent changes in leadership have been handled. They appreciate the communication from, and visibility of, the executive headteacher.
p.2
better?
Trustees have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities. In a short space of time, they have got to grips with the strengths and next steps for the school.
p.2
better?
Recently appointed senior leaders are united in their ambition to deepen and strengthen the curriculum across all subjects. This includes reinstating visits to complement the curriculum. Their evaluation of what is working well and what needs to improve is accurate. They have a sensible plan in place to support the new leadership of SEND. This is making sure that the current effective identification and support for pupils with SEND continue uninterrupted.
p.2
better?
Leaders have set out an overview of what pupils should learn in all subjects and how teachers will check whether pupils have been successful. They have defined how pupils will apply what they know. However, not all subject leaders have given enough thought to the small building blocks of knowledge that need to be in place from Nursery through to Year 2. This varies from subject to subject. 1 and 2 November 2022
p.2
3
Where the curriculum is well thought out, including in mathematics, science and design and technology, pupils achieve well because they remember their learning and can talk about it. Where the intended content is less clear, teachers struggle to home in on the key things to teach or the best way to teach something. This leads to varying practice that limits pupils’ ability to securely remember their learning.
p.3
3
Staff in the early years are caring and nurturing. They promote reading well, and read stories with enthusiasm and expression. Children are kind to each other. They listen to adults and follow instructions. Leaders and staff plan activities that link to a theme. However, staff do not organise the learning environment and routines in a way that promotes children’s sustained interaction and conversation. Although children behave well and complete the activities, they do not show high levels of curiosity. Nor do children develop and use their language well enough across all areas of the curriculum.
p.3
3
Varying practice has crept into the teaching of phonics, too. Everyone is following the school’s phonics scheme. However, there are inconsistencies across the taught phonics sessions that are hindering lower-attaining pupils the most. Many pupils learn to read well and successfully. But for the few who need a little extra support, this is not the case. Pupils, including the less confident, enjoy reading. The lunchtime ‘Starbooks’ is a firm favourite. One pupil told an inspector, ‘I love Starbooks. You can enjoy your book in peace and quiet.’ Similar views were echoed by many.
p.3
3
Pupils understand and contribute to the wider world around them. They fondly recall singing to older people in a home and have a clear recollection of topics that they vote on over time. Pupils also enjoy ‘dancing around the world’. To see young pupils playing a range of instruments, including keyboards, drums and electric guitars almost as big as they are, was a joy for inspectors.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders make the right checks to ensure staff are safe to work with children. Leaders have a rigorous training programme for themselves and staff. This includes weekly scenarios to consider and respond to. Staff value this. Records show that staff have the right knowledge to notice and report all concerns.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders convey a strong sense of diligence in making sure that everyone knows what to do if a concern arises. They maintain an ‘it can happen here’ attitude.
p.3
Safeguarding
Pupils learn how to keep themselves safe. They know about road, water and online safety as well as how to be a good friend. 1 and 2 November 2022
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Teaching, in a few subjects, does not enable pupils to remember important curriculum content as well as they need to. As a result, in these subjects, pupils do not develop a greater depth of understanding. Subject leaders need to identify the key building blocks of knowledge from Nursery to Year 2 so that teachers can deliver the intended curriculum in a structured, well-sequenced and consistent manner. The teaching of phonics is not enabling some lower-attaining pupils to progress as well as they should. As a result, pupils who struggle to learn to read are not reaching fluency quickly enough. Leaders should ensure that the teaching of phonics is effective and supports all pupils to read with good fluency. Staff do not deliver the curriculum in the early years well enough. This means that pupils are not provided with sufficient opportunities to demonstrate their attitudes and behaviours through the characteristics of effective learning. Leaders
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
need to ensure that staff deliver the curriculum in a way that successfully engages and challenges children and develops their vocabulary across the seven areas of the curriculum.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 1 and 2 November 2022
p.4
School details
Headteacher Gerry Healy (Executive Headteacher)
p.5
School details
Website http://www.parkhall-inf.walsall.sch.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
Park Hall Infant Academy joined The Loriners Multi-Academy Trust on 1 October 2022. Prior to this, it had been Park Hall Infant Academy since February 2012. A new executive headteacher and head of school have been in post since September 2022. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors held meetings with the executive headteacher, the head of school and the special educational needs coordinator. 1 and 2 November 2022
p.5
6
Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics, science and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors also spoke to leaders and looked at samples of pupils’ work in some other subjects, including computing, music, geography, art and design and technology. The lead inspector spoke with three trustees. The lead inspector listened to a sample of pupils read. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They spoke formally with groups of pupils, as well as talking to pupils in lessons and around school. Inspectors reviewed responses to Ofsted’s online parent, pupil and staff surveys. Inspectors met with leaders about the school’s safeguarding procedures.
p.6
6
Inspectors reviewed policies and records relating to safeguarding, bullying, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors spoke to pupils and staff about pupils’ safety. The lead inspector reviewed a wide range of documentation, including the school’s evaluation and improvement plans, the scheme of delegation and information on the school’s website.
p.6
Inspection team
Kirsty Foulkes, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Darren Bishop Ofsted Inspector 1 and 2 November 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion