Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Trinity St Mary's CofE Primary School

Inspected 12 Oct 2022 · published 7 Dec 2022 · URN 101047

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sophie Healey-Welch (lead), Seamus Gibbons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Oct 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Seamus Gibbons, Sophie Healey-Welch

  • Postcode verified

    SW12 8DR

  • Name on report verified

    Trinity St Mary’s CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    101047

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseclearpositiveenjoyambitioussecurehappysaferespectful
Criticismconcernsinsufficientstruggleweaknessesseriousnot consistentlynot securenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1217w−13
  • Safeguarding129w−23

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,343
about usual (typical 1153)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 55
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Safeguarding 7%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection of a good school: Trinity St Mary’s CofE Primary School 6 Balham Park Road, London SW12 8DR

p.1

Outcome

There has been no change to this school’s overall judgement of good as a result of this ungraded (section 8) inspection. However, the evidence gathered suggests that the inspection grade might not be as high if a graded (section 5) inspection were carried out now. The next inspection will therefore be a graded inspection.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are happy and kept safe. They appreciate and understand the school’s values of kindness, unity and courage. Parents and carers praise the inclusive family atmosphere that the school has. Pupils are clear that any rare instances of bullying or unpleasant language are not tolerated by staff. Any concerns are dealt with swiftly. Pupils are respectful to each other.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Behaviour is positive. Pupils value being able to contribute to school life. For example, their ideas helped with the development of the new school behaviour policy. Pupils appreciate the rewards that they receive. For example, if pupils read regularly, teachers reward them with an entry in the ‘reading raffle’ box, with the chance to win a book to take home.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders are ambitious for pupils to have a range of experiences and to enjoy their learning. The curriculum is broad. However, the precise knowledge that pupils need to secure is not clear in all subjects. Sometimes, pupils struggle to remember and explain important ideas.

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have opportunities to take on leadership roles. These include, for example, being faith leaders, eco warriors and part of the school council. They feel that their thoughts and opinions are listened to by staff. For example, pupils take part in interviews for appointments of new staff members. Pupils have also helped to redesign their playground.

p.1

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Reading is a priority and teachers and most support staff have received phonics training. However, this training has not been tailored to the phonics programme that the school is 12 October 2022

p.1

2

using. Leaders do not have a close enough understanding of whether this training is helping staff to improve their expertise in teaching pupils how to read. Sometimes, staff do not check that the books pupils read are carefully matched to the sounds that they have learned. This means that pupils are not routinely supported to read with increasing fluency. Some pupils have gaps in their phonics knowledge, and this holds them back in their learning in other subject areas. For example, some pupils struggle to read instructions in mathematics. Leaders are aware of the weaknesses in early reading and have plans in place to address these concerns.

p.2

2

Pupils follow a broad curriculum that matches the scope of what is expected nationally. In some subjects, leaders have thought carefully about what pupils need to know. For example, in mathematics, pupils develop their knowledge of calculation well. Teachers select resources, such as objects and pictures, to support pupils to increase their understanding. Pupils use and apply what they have already learned when they move on to more complex calculations.

p.2

2

However, in other subjects, leaders have not identified the most important knowledge that pupils need to learn. They have not ensured that the full content of the national curriculum is covered in sufficient depth. This means that, sometimes, pupils do not secure their understanding of the basic concepts in a subject before advancing to more complex learning. Similarly, in the early years, children undertake a range of activities designed to support each area of learning. However, these activities are not focused sufficiently on the important ideas that children need to secure. The curriculum provided for two-year-olds does not build cumulatively through the Nursery and Reception classes. This means that key knowledge has not been fully understood and embedded when pupils begin Year 1.

p.2

2

Teachers make use of a range of strategies to check pupils’ understanding. Where leaders’ curriculum thinking is clear, teachers are able to identify and tackle pupils’ misconceptions. However, this is not done consistently in all subjects.

p.2

2

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are accurately identified. They typically receive appropriate additional support. Teachers have the required information to support these pupils to access the curriculum.

p.2

2

Leaders provide a range of experiences for pupils to promote their broader development. These include, for example, visits to the National Gallery and Science Museum. Pupils enjoy attending a range of after-school activities and celebrating different cultures. Behaviour is typically positive in classrooms and around the school. Pupils appreciate the weekly merit assemblies and house competitions that recognise and celebrate good behaviour.

p.2

2

Teachers value the way that leaders are considerate of their workload and well-being. They feel supported in their roles and are proud to work at the school.

p.2

2

Governors are aware of their statutory responsibilities and understand the importance of holding leaders to account. They know what the school’s priorities are and check how these are being followed up on. Nevertheless, while leaders have identified the right 12 October 2022

p.2

3

priorities for reading, there has been insufficient focus placed on the development of the curriculum in other subject areas.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders have ensured that all staff receive clear and specific safeguarding training. This helps them to be vigilant to the needs of the pupils and their families. Staff are aware of how to identify and report any concerns that may arise. Leaders complete appropriate pre-employment checks on staff.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders act effectively when concerns arise, and record-keeping is typically clear. In a few instances, follow-up actions from concerns raised are not logged as consistently. Leaders have plans in place to address this.

p.3

Safeguarding

Leaders make appropriate use of external agencies to support pupils and their families. Leaders also provide on-site counselling. Pupils appreciate and make use of this service. The curriculum helps to ensure that pupils know how to keep themselves safe, including when online.

p.3

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 Pupils are not routinely provided with reading books that match the sounds that they have learned. This means there is insufficient opportunity for pupils to practise their reading. This limits the development of some pupils’ fluency and confidence. Leaders should ensure that all staff receive well-targeted guidance on delivering the phonics programme and that pupils are provided with books that closely match the sounds they know.  Leaders have not identified the knowledge and skills that need to be built up in different subjects over time. This includes in the early years. This reduces how well pupils secure and develop their knowledge. Leaders must ensure that the most important knowledge in each subject, as outlined in the national curriculum, is clearly identified and sequenced cumulatively over time. 12 October 2022

p.3

Background

When we have judged a school to be good, we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called an ungraded inspection, and it is carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. We do not give graded judgements on an ungraded inspection. However, if we find evidence that a school would now receive a higher or lower grade, then the next inspection will be a graded inspection, which is carried out under section 5 of the Act. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the ungraded inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will deem the ungraded inspection a graded inspection immediately.

p.4

Background

This is the second ungraded inspection since we judged the school to be good in May 2012.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.4

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.4

Further information

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 12 October 2022

p.4

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.5

School details

Chair of governing body Hayley Ven Den Bergh

p.5

School details

Date of previous inspection 21 March 2017, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.5

Information about this school

 The school has provision for two-year-olds.  The school does not currently make use of alternative provision.  The school has a Christian religious character. It is part of the London Diocesan Board of Schools. The school’s last section 48 inspection was in 2017.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher. They spoke with the chair of governors and representatives of the governing body. They also spoke with the local authority school improvement partner and a representative of the London Diocesan Board of Schools.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: early reading, mathematics and art. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, 12 October 2022

p.5

6

visited a sample of lessons, spoke with teachers, spoke with some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors also considered the curriculum in other subjects. Discussions were held with pupils about their learning in these subjects.  In considering safeguarding, inspectors reviewed the single central record of pre- employment checks and scrutinised relevant documents and records. They also spoke with school leaders, staff and pupils about safeguarding.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour around the school and in lessons.  Inspectors reviewed responses from staff, parents and pupils to Ofsted’s online surveys.

p.6

Inspection team

Sophie Healey-Welch, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector

p.6

Inspection team

Seamus Gibbons Ofsted Inspector 12 October 2022

p.6

7

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

7

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

7

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

7

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

7

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion