Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

St James' Church of England Junior School

Inspected — · published 5 Dec 2022 · URN 115606

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dale Burr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dale Burr

  • Postcode verified

    GL1 4JU

  • Name on report verified

    St James Church of England Junior School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositivesecureprecise
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings622w−4
  • What needs to improve59w+47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
679
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Simon Millington Executive Headteacher St James Church of England Junior School Upton Street Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 4JU

p.1

Junior School

This letter sets out the findings from the monitoring inspection of your school that took place on 12 October 2022, on behalf of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills. The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8(2) of the Education Act 2005 and took place because the school has received three successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous graded (section 5) inspections.

p.1

Junior School

During the inspection, I discussed with you, the operational headteacher, other staff, governors and the local authority the actions that have been taken to improve the school since the most recent graded inspection. We discussed the ongoing impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic. I also visited lessons, listened to pupils read, looked at samples of pupils’ work, spoke to some pupils about their learning, reviewed curriculum documents and the school development plan. I have considered all this in coming to my judgement.

p.1

Junior School

St James Church of England Junior School continues to require improvement.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

necessary for the school to become good.

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Leaders have made progress to improve the school, but more work is

 ensure that there is a systematic plan to secure the improvements needed in all of the wider curriculum subjects  ensure that all governors strengthen their understanding of how well pupils learn the curriculum so they can provide the most effective support and challenge.

p.1

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, the leadership structure has been strengthened. An operational headteacher is in post, working alongside the executive headteacher. Two new governors have joined the school. In September 2022, a teacher of English as an additional language was appointed to support the increasing number of pupils who do not speak English fluently. In January 2023, the school will formally federate with Hatherley Infant School.

p.2

Main findings

You and your staff have raised the profile of reading in response to the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. You have introduced a new and effective early reading programme. Pupils now receive the right support to meet their needs. Leaders use assessment well to check the progress pupils make. This is helping those who have fallen behind with their reading to catch up. Your investment in age-appropriate books allows pupils to practise and consolidate their reading skills. All staff have been trained to ensure they teach the phonics programme as intended. Despite this, there remains some variation in staff expertise.

p.2

Main findings

Your work to overhaul the wider curriculum is starting to have a positive impact. Many subject leaders have sharpened their focus on identifying the precise knowledge and vocabulary pupils must know and remember. Teachers provide regular opportunities for pupils to recap their learning. This helps them retain the most important knowledge and vocabulary, particularly in mathematics and history. Nonetheless, improvements to curriculum thinking in other subjects, such as design technology and art and design, are in the early stages. This limits the progress pupils make through the whole curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You and other senior leaders have better oversight of how the curriculum is being taught. Leaders make regular checks to see what pupils know and remember. The chair and vice- chair of governors attend local authority ‘project group’ meetings to discuss the impact of leaders’ actions to improve the school. You have recently introduced a monitoring schedule so that all governors can assure themselves of how well pupils learn the curriculum. However, it is too early to see the impact of this work.

p.2

Main findings

You value the guidance and support provided by local school leaders and the local authority on curriculum design. Staff are positive about the external training they receive to develop their expertise. They benefit from stronger links with the infant school. This helps to ensure the curriculum design builds on pupils’ prior learning.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Gloucester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted reports website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion