Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
Lanesend Primary School
Summary
Lee Selby (lead), Laurie Anderson, Rachel Goplen
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Sept 2022
- Inspectors verified
Laurie Anderson, Lee Selby, Rachel Goplen
- Behaviour and attitudes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development verified
Good
- Quality of education verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
PO31 7ES
- Name on report verified
Lanesend Primary School
- URN verified
141305
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Behaviour and attitudesGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal developmentGood
- Quality of educationRequires improvement
15% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (5,043 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils make the most of the excellent facilities available to them at breaktimes, such as the trampolines and tyres. p.2
- Leaders have high expectations about behaviour and pupils quickly settle into the routines of school life. p.2
- Staff enjoy working at the school and feel well supported by leaders. p.3
- This is because the school does not have a validated phonics scheme in place to help all pupils make rapid progress. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They have not held the headteacher and other senior leaders to account for low expectations, a decline in performance and the failure to meet statutory duties in the recent past. p.3
- As a result, pupils do not consistently make good progress in learning and remembering the curriculum. p.4
- There are low expectations for pupils with SEND, many of whom do not learn to read well enough. p.2
- account for low expectations, underperformance and compliance with statutory duties. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Trustees should take immediate action to ensure that they have an impartial view of school performance and have systems in place to hold leaders to account, including for any breach in statutory guidance or underperformance. p.4
- However, expectations about what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), can achieve academically are not always as high as they should be. p.2
- Over a third of pupils in key stage 1 are at least a year behind where they should be. p.2
- Key knowledge and vocabulary which pupils need to learn from Reception through to Year 6 has not been identified. p.2
- Leaders and trustees should implement a validated phonics programme and ensure that all staff are well trained in how to teach it with fidelity and precision. p.4
- Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is coherently sequenced in all subjects to help pupils to learn well. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,242
- about usual (typical 1215)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 56
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of Lanesend Primary School Love Lane, Cowes, Isle of Wight PO31 7ES
p.1
Inspection dates: 14 and 15 September 2022
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and management Requires improvement Early years provision Requires improvement Previous inspection grade Good 14 and 15 September 2022
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils enthusiastically enjoy coming to school. This is demonstrated by the very high rates of attendance. School days are full of memories of wonderful events, enjoyable activities and trips to the theatre and museums. There is a different range of interesting clubs for each year group which are well attended. Pupils recall fondly the termly curriculum focuses. However, they are less likely to remember the key knowledge in the curriculum.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders have high expectations about behaviour and pupils quickly settle into the routines of school life. They behave well in class and around the school. Pupils make the most of the excellent facilities available to them at breaktimes, such as the trampolines and tyres. Bullying is not tolerated. The few reported cases are dealt with swiftly by leaders with the help of pupils themselves in their role as anti- bullying ambassadors.
p.2
What is it like to attend this school?
Socially and emotionally, pupils are well prepared for the next stages of their education. Opportunities to take on responsibility or make a difference to the school or wider community are widespread. However, expectations about what pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), can achieve academically are not always as high as they should be.
p.2
better?
Too few pupils learn to read quickly and accurately. Over a third of pupils in key stage 1 are at least a year behind where they should be. There are low expectations for pupils with SEND, many of whom do not learn to read well enough. This means they cannot access the full curriculum. The school does not use a recognised phonics programme to help pupils learn to read well. Leaders responsible for reading recognise that staff require further training in the teaching of phonics. Pupils are sometimes asked to complete tasks when they have not learned the prerequisite skills. For example, pupils in Year 2 were asked to write down a dictated sentence when they were unable to form their letters correctly. While some pupils struggle to read themselves, pupils across the school love to listen to and retell stories in their own words.
p.2
better?
The curriculum is not coherently sequenced. Each year, three whole-school, termly curriculum focuses are planned with interesting titles such as ‘100 Years of the BBC’. Teachers then have to rearrange the national curriculum in each subject to fit these topics. This means that important curriculum content is not taught in the same order each year so as to ensure that it builds coherently. This results in pupils remembering interesting activities and random facts rather than important knowledge in different subjects, such as science. Key knowledge and vocabulary which pupils need to learn from Reception through to Year 6 has not been identified.
p.2
better?
Teachers do plan short sequences of lessons within termly curriculum focuses and check pupils’ progress within these with informal assessments. However, this is not 14 and 15 September 2022
p.2
3
built on progressively in future year groups. Other assessments used across the school do not directly test what has been taught. This leads to teachers continuously and inaccurately trying to fill gaps in knowledge, for example in mathematics, rather than teach the curriculum coherently in the first place.
p.3
3
Throughout the school, pupils with SEND receive individual support from adults who are dedicated to supporting them. Those with the most significant needs work diligently to achieve the small-step targets in their education, health and care plans (EHC plans). Although most parents and carers are entirely happy with the school, some parents of children with SEND find it difficult to communicate with leaders about their children’s education.
p.3
3
Trustees, by their own admission, are inexperienced as trustees despite their helpful individual skills and relevant experience. They have not held the headteacher and other senior leaders to account for low expectations, a decline in performance and the failure to meet statutory duties in the recent past. Trustees too readily rely on the opinion of senior leaders who are also trustees themselves, rather than getting an external view of how well the school is performing.
p.3
3
Staff enjoy working at the school and feel well supported by leaders. Newer staff work with more experienced colleagues when planning the curriculum in each year group every year.
p.3
3
Children in Reception have settled very quickly into the school’s behaviour routines due to the extensive staff support for their arrival. Pupils really like and understand the reward systems. Behaviour is generally good, with poor behaviour dealt with swiftly. Pupils learn what makes a good friend and are taught to be inclusive ‘regardless of sexuality or race’. Pupils have a strong sense of fairness and say ‘we have been taught to treat people with equality’ so that everyone has what they need.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.3
Safeguarding
Training for leaders and staff in safeguarding is appropriate and up to date. This means that they understand their statutory responsibilities and how to identify any concerns that may be affecting the well-being of pupils or their families.
p.3
Safeguarding
Leaders and teachers identify many opportunities for pupils to learn how to stay safe. However, as with the rest of the curriculum, these are not coherently planned. Pupils feel safe and are safe in school.
p.3
Safeguarding
During the inspection, leaders had to update their records of checks on staff, trustees and volunteers to ensure that they complied with statutory guidance.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Too many pupils, including those with SEND, do not learn to read quickly. This is because the school does not have a validated phonics scheme in place to help all pupils make rapid progress. Leaders and trustees should implement a validated phonics programme and ensure that all staff are well trained in how to teach it with fidelity and precision. The curriculum in most subjects is not coherently planned and sequenced. Teachers have to plan high-level subject objectives into overarching topics in a different order each year. As a result, pupils do not consistently make good progress in learning and remembering the curriculum. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum is coherently sequenced in all subjects to help pupils to learn well. The key knowledge and vocabulary to be taught in each year group, including the early years, should be clearly identified. Current governance structures do not allow trustees to hold senior leaders to
p.4
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
account for low expectations, underperformance and compliance with statutory duties. At times, leaders lack candour, and trustees do not seek to validate what they are told, for example through an external view of school performance. As a result, trustees have been led to believe the school is performing better than it is. Trustees should take immediate action to ensure that they have an impartial view of school performance and have systems in place to hold leaders to account, including for any breach in statutory guidance or underperformance.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 14 and 15 September 2022
p.4
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 July 2017 under Section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.5
Information about this school
Lanesend Primary is a stand-alone academy in a single academy trust. The school provides wrap-around care through a breakfast and after-school club. There are more pupils with EHC plans for their SEND than in the average primary school.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. The lead inspector met with three trustees, including the chair. Inspectors carried out deep dives in these subjects: reading, mathematics, science, art and history. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum 14 and 15 September 2022
p.5
6
with subject leaders, spoke to teachers, spoke to pupils about their learning and, where possible, visited a sample of lessons and looked at samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors met with leaders responsible for safeguarding, scrutinised safeguarding records, staff recruitment checks and risk assessments. They talked to a variety of staff about how they help to keep pupils safe. Inspectors considered responses to the confidential staff and pupil surveys. They also reviewed responses to Ofsted Parent View, the online questionnaire, and spoke to parents at the start of the inspection.
p.6
Inspection team
Lee Selby, lead inspector His Majesty’s Inspector
p.6
Inspection team
Rachel Goplen Ofsted Inspector 14 and 15 September 2022
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion