Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (EIF)

Croft Pre School

Inspected 20 Oct 2022 · published 25 Nov 2022 · URN 314740

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Katherine Lakes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    The Croft Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP518478

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Oct 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Katherine Lakes

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of education verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    YO43 3FE

  • Name on report verified

    Croft Pre School

  • URN verified

    314740

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2022.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Quality of educationRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−49Criticalmore positive than 30% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiousenjoyclearimprovedweaknessesconsistentlysafetimely
Criticismnot alwaysnot consistentlyconcernsfailnot effectivefailednot effectivelyconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings847w−40
  • Safeguarding242w−58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,056
about usual (typical 972)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 51
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 1
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Safeguarding 15%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Croft Pre School Scout & Guide H Q, Providence Row, Market Weighton, YORK YO43 3FE

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Requires improvement Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Inadequate Leadership and management Inadequate Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

The provision is inadequate

Children's welfare is not protected. The provider has not made all the required improvements since their last inspection. The designated safeguarding lead does not have the knowledge and skills they need to fulfil their role. Children mainly behave well. For example, older children help younger children as they create a picture. However, the expectations for children's behaviour are not clear. Children sometimes run inside, with some staff only advising them 'no running'. Children do not understand what the consequences of their behaviour might be, as staff fail to explain this to them. Staff do not effectively help children to learn how to keep themselves safe.

p.2

The provision is inadequate

Children choose what they would like to play with at the pre-school. Staff know what children need to learn next to help them in their development. However, staff, the manager, and the special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) do not always share information in a timely way, to consider the support the child needs. As a result, children do not make the progress of which they are capable across the seven areas of learning. Children enjoy the resources and activities on offer. They spend time with staff as they solve problems, such as how to get the wooden ball down the ramp. Staff encourage children to keep on trying. This helps them to concentrate and builds their resilience.

p.2

need to do better?

n Children mainly behave well and require little adult support. When children try to use the same toy, a conflict occurs. Although staff try to resolve the conflict, this is not consistent for children. Some staff distract children and others try to explain what went wrong. As a result, children do not know the expectation. They do not learn the skills they need to help them to understand their behaviour and emotions. n Children are not able to access fresh drinking water during the day at pre- school. There is a jug which is out of reach of children. Staff do not offer children a drink from this jug. At snack time, water or milk is offered to children but this is not available at any other time. Children bring their own water bottles, which are kept outside the pre-school room. The manager explains they often have juice in their bottles for lunch. This does not support their oral health. The manager has not provided children or families with any information about how

p.2

need to do better?

to improve or maintain their oral health. n Staff do not consistently support children's communication and language skills. For example, some staff do not give children enough time to think and respond as they ask questions. They quickly move on to the next question, leaving children unable to share their own ideas. Some staff use sign language with the children. However, this is not consistent. As a result, children do not make good

p.2

need to do better?

20 October 2022 progress in their communication and language skills. n Staff identify when children may need additional support in their learning, such as when children are not making progress in their communication and language development. Although staff are aware of this, they do not always share this information quickly with the SENCO or parents. When the SENCO is not available, the manager is unable to provide clear information about children who require support. This means that children do not always receive the timely support they need to help them make the progress of which they are capable. n Staff do not consistently share information with parents about their child's learning needs. Parents are not always aware who their child's key person is and what their child is learning. Although staff know the children well, information is not shared effectively to further support children's learning at home.

p.2

need to do better?

n Since the last inspection, the manager has made some changes to the educational programme at the pre-school. For example, staff plan activities linked to a story and they now ensure the activity builds on what their key children know and can do. This helps staff to have a better understanding of how to challenge children further. As a result, children are more engaged in their learning. n The manager has ambitious plans for the outdoor learning environment. They explain how they work with the local community. For example, a local group has built a mud kitchen for them. They have put this in the garden to help children to be creative and gain a better understanding of the world. n The manager has improved the supervision of staff. She has time with staff to discuss their next steps in their professional development. For example, the manager and staff team have identified behaviour management training. Staff

p.3

need to do better?

explain how they hope the training will help them and the children. However, not all weaknesses in staff practice and knowledge have been identified. This results in children not benefiting fully from a quality provision.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

The designated safeguarding lead does not have a detailed understanding of her role and responsibilities. She has failed to follow the local safeguarding partnership policies and procedures when an allegation is made against a member of staff. She does not show her understanding of the timescales for reporting concerns. Although she would report concerns about a child's welfare, she does not fully understand the setting's safeguarding policy. This does not protect children's welfare. Since the last inspection, all staff have completed training to improve their safeguarding knowledge and understanding. This includes identifying possible signs of radicalisation and extreme views.

p.3

Due date

ensure the designated safeguarding lead has the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfil their role, including maintaining an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues and knowing what to do in the event of an allegation, in line with your local safeguarding children partnership procedures 25/11/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure staff consistently reinforce clear boundaries and expectations of children's behaviour, and manage behaviour appropriately 25/11/2022

p.4

Due date

ensure children have access to fresh drinking water and that their good oral health is promoted. 25/11/2022

p.4

Due date

improve staff's understanding of how to support children's communication and language development 16/12/2022

p.4

Due date

have early discussions with a child's parents, where their progress causes concern, and agree and put in place targeted support for their learning 16/12/2022

p.4

Due date

provide parents with information about their child's key person, learning and development, including how they can further support learning at home. 16/12/2022

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 314740 Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire Inspection number 10244692 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises Registers Early Years Register Day care type Sessional day care

p.5

inspection

Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 24 Name of registered person The Croft Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Telephone number 01430 874192 Date of previous inspection 18 May 2022

p.5

Information about this early years setting

Croft Pre School registered in 1992 and is situated in Market Weighton, near York. The pre-school employs four members of childcare staff. Of these, three hold appropriate qualifications at level 3 and the manager holds a qualification at level 6. The setting opens from Monday to Friday, term time only. Sessions are from 8.30am to 4pm. The setting provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.5

Inspection activities

n The inspector discussed any continued impact of the pandemic with the provider and has taken that into account in their evaluation of the provider. n The inspector viewed the provision and discussed the safety and suitability of the premises. n The manager joined the inspector on a learning walk and talked to the inspector about their curriculum and what they want their children to learn. n Children communicated with the inspector during the inspection. n The inspector talked to staff at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of their views. n The inspector spoke with the manager about the leadership and management of the setting. n The inspector observed the quality of education being provided, indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact that this was having on children's learning. n The manager and the inspector carried out a joint observation during group time. n Parents shared their views of the setting with the inspector.

p.6

Inspection activities

n The manager showed the inspector documentation to demonstrate the suitability of staff.

p.6

Inspection activities

We carried out this inspection under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Inspection activities

20 October 2022 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspection activities

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection activities

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.7

Inspection activities

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection activities

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion