Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)

Savio Salesian College

Inspected 22 Sept 2022 · published 24 Nov 2022 · URN 104959

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Sept 2022

  • Inspectors verified

    Ahmed Marikar, Andrea O'Neill, David Hampson

  • Behaviour and attitudes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Quality of education verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    L30 2NA

  • Name on report verified

    Savio Salesian College

  • URN verified

    104959

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Behaviour and attitudesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Quality of educationInadequate

3% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (5,043 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 62% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelywell supportedpositivelyrichconfidentloveimprovedknowledgeable
Criticismconcernsinadequateerrorspoorweaktoo lowlackunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1275w−22
  • Safeguarding103w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,343
about usual (typical 1552)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 53
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
6
typical 6
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Safeguarding 5%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection of Savio Salesian College Netherton Way, Bootle, Merseyside L30 2NA

p.1

Inspection dates: 21 and 22 September 2022

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate

The quality of education Inadequate Behaviour and attitudes Requires improvement Personal development Good Leadership and management Inadequate Previous inspection grade Inadequate 21 and 22 September 2022

p.1

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils have experienced a lot of changes in staffing since the last inspection. This has had a detrimental effect on their quality of education. Leaders’ expectations of pupils’ achievement are too low. Pupils have not achieved well over time. This is especially true for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). This situation is no better for those pupils currently attending the school.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Leaders, together with staff, have raised their expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils reported that behaviour is improving. Most pupils behave well in lessons and during breaktimes. However, some pupils continue to demonstrate occasional boisterous behaviour in corridors. In addition, some pupils do not behave well in lessons. This makes it difficult for other pupils to learn.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils feel safe. They know that they can speak to adults if they have any concerns. Pupils reported that staff would deal with bullying quickly if it did happen. Pupils who are new to the school feel well supported. This helps them to settle quickly into the school community.

p.2

What is it like to attend this school?

Many pupils spoke positively about the wide range of extra-curricular activities, such as sports and the school musical production. They can take part in trips and visits to outdoor residential centres. Pupils on the Bosco group have opportunities to develop their leadership skills, such as leading assemblies on mental health and well-being.

p.2

better?

Despite leaders’ and governors’ efforts since the previous inspection, they have not secured sufficient improvement to the quality of education that pupils receive. This remains inadequate. A lack of clarity about the school’s future, financial concerns and considerable turbulence in leadership and staff have all hampered leaders’ progress in bringing about much needed change. As a result, pupils continue to underachieve. They are ill-equipped for the next stage of their education, employment or training.

p.2

better?

Leaders are reviewing and refining the school’s curriculum. Subject curriculums are at very different stages of development. In some subjects, leaders identify the knowledge that they want pupils to learn and when they want teachers to deliver the content. This helps pupils to build on their prior learning. However, many other subject curriculums are unclear. Some teachers do not know what pupils should be taught. This leads to pupils learning disconnected facts. They are not able to build up a rich body of knowledge about the subjects that they study.

p.2

better?

Many teachers do not use assessment strategies sufficiently well to check if pupils have understood their work or to identify any errors and misunderstandings. As a result, teachers are not alert to pupils’ misconceptions or gaps in their knowledge. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.2

3

This means that pupils are moved on to new learning without first securing their understanding. This stops them from building on what they know and can do.

p.3

3

A small minority of subject leaders are not subject specialists and do not have the subject-specific knowledge to improve their subject areas. This hinders the capacity of leaders to bring about swift improvements.

p.3

3

Leaders have raised the profile of reading in the school. Pupils who have fallen behind with reading are identified promptly and supported effectively. This is helping these pupils to become more fluent and confident readers. Leaders have introduced some new strategies to encourage all pupils to read for pleasure. This is developing pupils’ love of reading. Across the curriculum, teachers focus on developing pupils’ subject-specific vocabulary. This helps pupils to improve their understanding of key words.

p.3

3

The provision for pupils with SEND is poor. Although leaders have improved their systems to identify pupils with additional needs, teachers are ill-equipped to adapt the delivery of the curriculum to help these pupils succeed. These pupils tread water over time. They do not achieve well.

p.3

3

Many pupils behave well in lessons. However, some teachers do not follow the procedures for managing pupils’ behaviour closely enough. This means that staff find it difficult to teach and pupils find it difficult to learn. A small minority of pupils continue to misbehave during breaktimes.

p.3

3

Leaders ensure that pupils have the opportunity to learn about different cultures and religions. Pupils learn the importance of respecting differences between people. They develop an age-appropriate understanding of relationships and sex education and health education. Pupils receive helpful careers guidance. They have opportunities to visit universities. This helps to raise their aspirations.

p.3

3

The headteacher and his newly formed senior leadership team are providing much- needed stability. Despite the considerable turbulence in the school, staff feel that leaders are considerate of their workload.

p.3

3

Governors have tried to be proactive. For example, they have secured the services of an external consultant. This is helping them to be more knowledgeable about the education that pupils are receiving. Governors have increased their level of challenge and support provided to leaders. However, their efforts have been hampered by the uncertainty of the school’s future.

p.3

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.3

Safeguarding

Staff are vigilant about the potential risks that pupils may face. Staff receive up-to- date safeguarding training. They know how to spot potential signs of abuse and what to do if they have any concerns. Leaders work effectively with external 21 and 22 September 2022

p.3

4

agencies to ensure the safety and well-being of vulnerable pupils. Leaders regularly check the safety of pupils who sometimes attend another setting.

p.4

4

Leaders ensure that pupils learn about risks that they might face outside school, including the dangers related to gang and knife crime. Pupils are taught how to stay safe online.

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

 In many subjects, leaders have not thought carefully enough about the knowledge that pupils should learn. This means that teachers do not have the information that they need about what should be taught. This stops pupils from building on what they know. Leaders should ensure that they finalise their curriculum thinking so that teachers are clear about what they should be teaching and when this should take place.  In many subjects, teachers do not use assessment strategies well enough to check on pupils’ understanding of previous knowledge. This means that they move on to new topics without making sure that pupils know and remember their earlier learning. This hampers pupils’ achievement. Leaders should ensure that teachers use assessment strategies effectively to identify pupils’ errors and misconceptions so that they can build their knowledge securely over time.  Provision for pupils with SEND is weak. Many pupils with SEND do not receive the

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

support that they need. Consequently, these pupils do not achieve well. Leaders must ensure that staff are suitably trained so that they are able to adapt the delivery of the curriculum to meet the needs of pupils with SEND within their classes.  Some teachers do not follow the school’s behaviour policy closely enough. Consequently, a small minority of pupils misbehave during lessons and social times. This hinders pupils’ learning. Leaders should ensure that staff apply the behaviour policy consistently so that pupils’ behaviour improves in lessons and around the school.  A small minority of subject leaders are not subject specialists. They do not have the subject knowledge to lead their areas of responsibility. As a result, they do not have the capacity to bring about much-needed change to the curriculum or to support staff in delivering the curriculum. Leaders must ensure that these subject leaders receive the help that they need to be able to lead their subjects with

p.4

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

expertise. Leaders and governors may not appoint early career teachers. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.4

How can I feed back my views?

or to find out what other parents and carers think. We use information from Ofsted Parent View when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.

p.5

How can I feed back my views?

The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.

p.5

Further information

You can search for published performance information about the school.

p.5

Further information

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.5

School details

Inspection number 10216081 Type of school Secondary Comprehensive

p.6

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.6

School details

Date of previous inspection 10 and 11 December 2019, under section 8 of the Education Act 2005

p.6

Information about this school

 The school has a Catholic ethos. The most recent section 48 inspection was in January 2017.  There have been significant changes to leadership and staffing since the last inspection. This includes the appointment of different special educational needs coordinators and several subject leaders. Two new deputy headteachers were appointed in September 2022.  Leaders make use of three registered alternative providers and one unregistered provision for a small number of pupils.  The school meets the requirements of the Baker Clause, which requires schools to provide pupils in Years 8 to 13 with information about approved technical education qualifications and apprenticeships.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors carried out this graded inspection under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. 21 and 22 September 2022

p.6

7

In accordance with section 44(1) of the Education Act 2005, His Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school.

p.7

7

 This was the first routine inspection the school received since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Inspectors discussed the impact of the pandemic with leaders and have taken that into account in their evaluation of the school.  Inspectors spoke with the headteacher, senior leaders, subject leaders and staff. The lead inspector held telephone conversations with the chair of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a representative of the Archdiocese of Liverpool.  Inspectors spoke to many pupils about their experience of school and their views on behaviour and bullying. Inspectors also observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons and at breaktimes.  Inspectors reviewed a wide range of evidence, including leaders’ self-evaluation documents, improvement plans, minutes of governing body meetings and records of pupils’ behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors checked the school’s safeguarding policies and procedures and the

p.7

7

single central record. Inspectors met with leaders, staff and pupils to check how effective safeguarding is in the school.  Inspectors carried out deep dives in design technology, English, mathematics, modern foreign languages and science. For each deep dive, inspectors discussed the curriculum with subject leaders, visited a sample of lessons, spoke to teachers, spoke to some pupils about their learning and looked at samples of pupils’ work. An inspector observed pupils reading to familiar staff.  Inspectors also spoke to leaders about the curriculum in some other subjects.  Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted Parent View. An inspector spoke with parents and carers before the start of the school day to gather their views.  No responses to Ofsted’s online survey for staff and pupils were received.

p.7

Inspection team

Ahmed Marikar, lead inspector His Majesty's Inspector

p.7

Inspection team

Andrea O'Neill Ofsted Inspector 21 and 22 September 2022

p.7

8

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

8

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

8

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

8

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

8

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion